Defining microvascular injury in acute myocardial infarction and response after cell therapy using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Although mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction have decreased over the years, the number of patients suffering from heart failure after myocardial infarction is increasing. Early recognition of patients at risk for heart failure is necessary to optimise treatment. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging allows the accurate depiction of cardiac morphology, function, perfusion and tissue composition. Although CMR has already established itself as a valuable tool in clinical practice, new CMR techniques may provide additional information on the severity of the injury and expected recovery.
In the first part of this thesis, novel CMR techniques were addressed to further evaluate the composition of the myocardium after PCI-treated myocardial infarction. A few days after myocardial infarction, T1 and T2* values are increased in the infarcted myocardium. However, if microvascular injury (MVI) was present, T1 and T2* values significantly decreased in the infarcted area, showing that T1 and T2* values need to be interpreted carefully in the presence of MVI.
Additionally, we further investigated the tissue composition of areas with MVI by using a porcine model of reperfused myocardial infarction. Seven days after inducing a myocardial infarction by temporary coronary artery occlusion, CMR with T2-weighted imaging and late gadolinium enhancement imaging was performed, directly followed by histological examination of the myocardium. This showed that CMR-defined areas of MVI contain extensive necrosis with extravasation of erythrocytes, and complete destruction of the vasculature, while the surrounding contrast-enhanced area showed necrosis with intact microvessels containing microthrombi. The new insight into the relation of MVI, T2-defined haemorrhage and the histological findings shows that the phenomenon of MVI may not be caused by microvascular thrombotic ‘obstruction’ alone and allows further research into strategies aiming to preserve the microvasculature to attenuate damage.
Thirdly, CMR showed us that LGE-defined infarcted tissue heterogeneity can help in predicting the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) on 24-hour Holter monitoring 1 month after the infarction. Larger proportions of grey zone, or penumbra, were associated with an increased risk of VTs, supporting the theory that infarct heterogeneity may facilitate VT development. As risk stratification for effective prophylactic ICD implantation remains debated, further studies into the infarct composition may help in identifying the patients who might benefit from ICD therapy.
The second part of this thesis assessed the effects of intracoronary cell therapy after myocardial infarction on perfusion recovery and long-term functional recovery. In the first days after the infarction, perfusion differed between the infarcted myocardium and remote, unaffected myocardium. These regional differences persisted after 4 months and no difference in perfusion recovery was found for any treatment group in any of the regions. At long-term follow-up, no additional functional improvement was found from cell therapy on left ventricle function, suggesting that cell therapy does not provide benefit in its current form as an adjuvant treatment strategy after myocardial infarction.
In conclusion, the thesis shows the versatility of CMR and its necessity for daily cardiology practice. In the future, it may provide us with new tools to identify patients with more severe myocardial damage due to infarct-related haemorrhage, and patients with increased risk of developing arrhythmias after infarction. Further assessment of infarct tissue characteristics and the relation with functional recovery may provide more tailored therapy for patients after myocardial infarction.
L.F.H.J. Robbers
VUMC
Email:
lrobbers@spaarnegasthuis.nl