Introduction
Methods
Participants
Measure
Data analysis
Software
Results
CFA
Item | Mean | SD | Factor loading |
---|---|---|---|
Item 1 | 2.37 (2.37)a | 1.11 (1.11) | 0.77 (0.77) |
Item 2 | 2.16 (2.16) | 1.10 (1.10) | 0.84 (0.85) |
Item 3 | 1.83 (1.83) | 0.91 (0.91) | 0.80 (0.80) |
Item 4 | 1.99 (1.99) | 1.19 (1.19) | 0.76 (0.76) |
Item 5 | 1.48 (1.46) | 0.91 (0.83) | 0.68 (0.70) |
Item 6 | 2.31 (2.31) | 1.19 (1.19) | 0.79 (0.80) |
Item 7 | 1.68 (1.68) | 1.01 (1.01) | 0.75 (0.75) |
Item 8 | 1.87 (1.87) | 1.03 (1.03) | 0.84 (0.84) |
Item 9 | 2.01 (2.01) | 0.99 (0.99) | 0.70 (0.68) |
Item 10 | 1.84 (1.84) | 0.94 (0.94) | 0.63 (0.62) |
Item 11 | 1.66 | 0.90 | 0.65 |
Mokken analysis
Item | Mean | ItemH (Hi)a | Stand Error | Dimensionality |
---|---|---|---|---|
Item 1 | 2.37 (2.37)b | 0.64 (0.65) | 0.03 (0.03) | 1 (1) |
Item 2 | 2.16 (2.16) | 0.67 (0.69) | 0.03 (0.03) | 1 (1) |
Item 3 | 1.83 (1.83) | 0.65 (0.66) | 0.03 (0.03) | 1 (1) |
Item 4 | 1.99 (1.99) | 0.61 (0.62) | 0.03 (0.03) | 1 (1) |
Item 5 | 1.48 (1.46) | 0.60 (0.62) | 0.05 (0.04) | 1 (1) |
Item 6 | 2.31 (2.31) | 0.64 (0.65) | 0.03 (0.03) | 1 (1) |
Item 7 | 1.68 (1.68) | 0.61 (0.62) | 0.04 (0.04) | 1 (1) |
Item 8 | 1.87 (1.87) | 0.68 (0.68) | 0.03 (0.03) | 1 (1) |
Item 9 | 2.01 (2.01) | 0.59 (0.57) | 0.04 (0.04) | 1 (1) |
Item 10 | 1.84 (1.84) | 0.53 (0.53) | 0.04 (0.04) | 1 (1) |
Item 11 | 1.66 | 0.55 | 0.04 | 1 |
Graded response model
Item | a | b1 | b2 | b3 | b4 | Factor 1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item 1 | 2.45 (2.47)a | − 0.89 (− 0.89) | 0.27 (0.27) | 1.24 (1.24) | 2.05 (2.04) | 0.82 (0.82) |
Item 2 | 3.44 (3.51) | − 0.48 (− 0.48) | 0.45 (0.45) | 1.31 (1.31) | 2.08 (2.08) | 0.90 (0.90) |
Item 3 | 2.96 (3.01) | − 0.19 (− 0.18) | 0.91 (0.91) | 2.03 (2.02) | 2.75 (2.74) | 0.87 (0.87) |
Item 4 | 2.24 (2.25) | − 0.15 (− 0.15) | 0.70 (0.70) | 1.49 (1.49) | 2.11 (2.10) | 0.80 (0.80) |
Item 5 | 2.30 (2.32) | 0.69 (0.69) | 1.37 (1.37) | 2.23 (2.23) | 2.65 | 0.80 (0.81) |
Item 6 | 2.64 (2.68) | − 0.57 (− 0.57) | 0.28 (0.27) | 1.24 (1.23) | 1.93 (1.92) | 0.84 (0.84) |
Item 7 | 2.45 (2.46) | 0.28 (0.28) | 1.09 (1.09) | 1.81 (1.80) | 2.49 (2.48) | 0.82 (0.82) |
Item 8 | 3.36 (3.34) | − 0.09 (− 0.09) | 0.79 (0.79) | 1.54 (1.53) | 2.56 (2.56) | 0.89 (0.89) |
Item 9 | 2.06 (1.93) | − 0.40 (− 0.41) | 0.65 (0.67) | 1.94 (1.99) | 3.02 (3.12) | 0.77 (0.75) |
Item 10 | 1.47 (1.43) | − 0.27 (− 0.27) | 1.24 (1.25) | 2.34 (2.37) | 3.84 (3.91) | 0.65 (0.64) |
Item 11 | 1.81 | 0.16 | 1.35 | 2.37 | 3.34 | 0.73 |
CAT simulation
SE (0.32) | SE (0.45) | SE (0.55) | |
---|---|---|---|
Alpha (α) | .90 | .80 | .70 |
Average number of items used | 3.36 | 3.06 | 2 |
Correlation between thetas | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.96 |
mean SEa | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.35 |
Item Mean | 3.36 | 3.06 | 2 |
Item median | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Item SDb | 2.68 | 2.65 | 0 |
Item range | 2–10 | 2–10 | 2–2 |
Time of iterations | 500 | 500 | 500 |
Item | Specified range | Information provided for specified range (%) | Total information provided for the whole scale |
---|---|---|---|
All 11 items | (− 10, + 10) | 73.03 (100%) | 73.03 |
All 11 items | (− 2, + 2) | 48.62 (66.58%) | 73.03 |
Item 2 | (− 2, + 2) | 7.75 (77.69%) | 9.98 |
Item 8 | (− 2, + 2) | 6.82 (67.89%) | 10.05 |
Items 2 and 8 | (− 2, + 2) | 14.57 (72.78%) | 20.02 |
Comparison among full QuickDASH, CAT, and Ultra-QuickDASH
DASH version | Included item (n) | Participant score | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Min | Max | Median | ||
QuickDASH | Items 1–11 (11) | 0.001 | 0.96 | − 1.67 | 2.80 | − 0.02 |
CATa | Items 1–10 (10) | − 0.01 | 0.97 | − 1.52 | 2.85 | 0.16 |
Ultra-QuickDASH | Items 2, 8 (2) | − 0.0003 | 0.92 | − 1.12 | 2.48 | 0.08 |
Correlation between participant scores | Mean difference | SDa of difference | RMSDb | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ultra-QuickDASH vs QuickDASH | 0.90 | − 0.001 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
CAT vs QuickDASH | 0.98 | − 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.19 |