Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The provision of visual support to individuals with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is widely recommended. We explored one mechanism underlying the use of visual supports: efficiency of language processing. Two groups of children, one with and one without an ASD, participated. The groups had comparable oral and written language skills and nonverbal cognitive abilities. In two semantic priming experiments, prime modality and prime–target relatedness were manipulated. Response time and accuracy of lexical decisions on the spoken word targets were measured. In the first uni-modal experiment, both groups demonstrated significant priming effects. In the second experiment which was cross-modal, no effect for relatedness or group was found. This result is considered in the light of the attentional capacity required for access to the lexicon via written stimuli within the developing semantic system. These preliminary findings are also considered with respect to the use of visual support for children with ASD.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). 2033.0.55.001 census of population and housing: Socio-economic indexes for area (SEIFA), Australia—Data only 2006. www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@nsf/mf/2033.0.55.001/. Accessed July 10, 2012.
Bruneau, N., Bonnet-Brilhault, F., Gomot, M., Adrien, J. L., & Barthelemy, C. (2003). Cortical auditory processing and communication in children with autism: electrophysiological/behavioral relations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 51(1), 17–25. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00149-1. PubMedCrossRef
Brysbaert, M. (2007). The language-as-fixed-effect-fallacy: Some simple SPSS solutions to a complex problem. London: Royal Holloway, University of London.
Castles, A., Holmes, V. M., Neath, J., & Kinoshita, S. (2003). How does orthographic knowledge influence performance on phonological awareness tasks? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, Human Experimental Psychology, 56, 445–467. CrossRef
Ceponiene, R., Lepisto, T., Shestakova, A., Vanhala, R., Alku, P., Naatanen, R., et al. (2003). Speech-sound-selective auditory impairment in children with autism: They can perceive but do not attend. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(9), 5567–5572. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Cree, G. S., McRae, K., & McNorgan, C. (1999). An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming. Cognitive Science, 23(3), 371–414. CrossRef
DeLemos, M. M. (1994). Standard progressive matrices; Australian manual. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. (1997). The peabody picture vocabulary test—Revised (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MI: American Guidance Service.
Dunn, M., Vaughan, H., Kreuzer, J., & Kurtzberg, D. (1999). Electrophysiologic correlates of semantic classification in autistic and normal children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 16(1), 79–99. CrossRef
Harris, M., & Coltheart, M. (1986). Language processing in children and adults: An introduction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hodgdon, L. (1999). Visual strategies for improving communication. Troy MI: QuirkRoberts Publishing.
Kamio, Y., & Toichi, M. (2000). Dual access to semantics in autism: Is pictorial access superior to verbal access. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(7), 859–867. CrossRef
Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P., & Risi, S. (1998). Autism diagnostic observation schedule manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Service.
Manly, T., Robertson, I. H., Anderson, V., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1999). The test of everyday attention in children. Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.
Marcus, L. F., Garfinkle, A., & Wolery, M. (2001). Issues in early diagnosis and intervention with young children. In E. Schopler, N. Yirmiya, C. Shulman, & L. M. Marcus (Eds.), The research basis for autism intervention (pp. 171–185). New York: Plenum Publishers.
McCleery, J. P., Ceponiene, R., Burner, K. M., Townsend, J., Kinnear, M., & Schreibman, L. (2010). Neural correlates of verbal and nonverbal semantic integration in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(3), 277–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02157.x. PubMedCrossRef
McRae, K., & Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(3), 558–572. CrossRef
Mirenda, P. (2001). Autism, augmentative communication, and assistive technology: What do we really know? Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(3), 141–151. CrossRef
Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A—Human Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 528–559. CrossRef
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106(3), 226–254. CrossRef
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In G. W. Humphreys & D. Besner (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–337). New York: Routledge.
Nelson, C., McDonnell, A. P., Johnston, S. S., Crompton, A., & Nelson, A. R. (2007). Keys to play: A strategy to increase the social interactions of young children with autism and their typically developing peers. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 165–181.
O’Riordan, M., & Plaisted, K. (2001). Enhanced discrimination in autism. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A—Human Experimental Psychology, 54(4), 961–979. CrossRef
Plaisted, K., O’Riordan, M., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1998). Enhanced visual search for a conjunctive target in autism: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39(5), 777–783. CrossRef
Plaisted, K., Saksida, L., Alcantara, J., & Weisblatt, E. (2003). Towards an understanding of the mechanisms of weak central coherence effects: Experiments in visual configural learning and auditory perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 358(1430), 375–386. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1211. CrossRef
Prior, M., Roberts, J., Rodgers, S., & Williams, K. (2011). A review of the research to identify the most effective models of practice in early intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders. Canberra: Australian Government.
Rao, S., & Gagie, B. (2006). Learning through seeing and doing: Visual supports for children with autism. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(6), 26–33.
Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358, 534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A—Human Experimental Psychology, 55, 1339–1362. CrossRef
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Coloured progressive matrices. (Vol. 2, Ravens Manual: Section 2). USA: Harcourt Assessment.
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2000). Standard progressive matrices (Ravens Manual: Section 3). USA: Pearson.
Roberts, J. M. A., & Prior, M. (2006). A review of the research to identify the most effective models of practice in early intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders. Canberra: Australian Government.
Schopler, E., & Mesibov, G. B. (1995). Introduction to learning and cognition in autism. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Learning and cognition in autism (pp. 3–11). Plenum Press: New York. CrossRef
Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2003). The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical methods (8th ed.). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Spears, C., & Turner, V. (2011). Rising to new heights of communication and learning for children with autism: The definitive guide to using alternative-augmentative communication, visual strategies, and learning supports at home and school. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Tabachnick, B. S., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Taft, M. (2001). Cognitive psychology of lexical access. In N. J. Smelser & P. J. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 8743–8748). Oxford: Pergamon. CrossRef
Tager-Flusberg, H. (2006). Defining language phenotypes in autism. Clinical Neuroscience Research, 6(3–4), 219–224. CrossRef
Woodcock, R. W., Mather, N., & Shrank, F. A. (2004). Woodcock-Johnson III diagnostic reading battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
- Efficiency of Lexical Access in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Does Modality Matter?
- Springer US