Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-11-2010 | Review Article

Efficacy of diagnostic tools for detecting cardiac arrhythmias: systematic literature search

Auteurs: E. Hoefman, P.J.E. Bindels, H.C.P.M. van Weert

Gepubliceerd in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Uitgave 11/2010

Abstract

Background/objectives. Symptoms suggestive of cardiac arrhythmias are a challenge to the diagnosis. Physical examination and a 12-lead ECG are of limited value, as rhythm disturbances are frequently of a paroxysmal nature. New technologies facilitate a more accurate diagnosis. The objective of this study was to review the medical literature in an effort to define a guide to rational diagnostic testing.

Methods. Primary studies on the use of a diagnostic tool in the evaluation of palpitations were searched in MEDLINE, and EMBASE with an additional reference check.

Results. Two types of studies were found: descriptive and experimental studies, which compared the yield of two or more devices or diagnostic strategies. Holter monitors seemed to have less diagnostic yield (33 to 35%) than event recorders. Automatically triggered recorders detect more arrhythmias (72 to 80%) than patient-triggered devices (17 to 75%). Implantable devices are used for prolonged monitoring periods in patients with infrequent symptoms or unexplained syncope.

Conclusion. The choice of the device depends on the characteristics of the symptoms and the patient. Due to methodological shortcomings of the included studies no evidence-based diagnostic strategy can be proposed. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:543–51.)

vorige artikel Transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defects in patients aged 40 years and older

volgende artikel The tale of the three sisters

Zwietering PJ, Knottnerus JA, Rinkens PE, Kleijne MA, Gorgels AP. Arrhythmias in general practice: diagnostic value of patient characteristics, medical history and symptoms. Fam Pract. 1998;15:343–353.PubMedCrossRef

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Fam Pract. 2004;21:4–10.PubMedCrossRef

Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS, Bossuyt PMM. Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(:iii,iv–51).

Glasziou P, Irwig L, Deeks JJ. When should a new test become the current reference standard? Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149:816–821.PubMed

Martinez T, Sztajzel J. Utility of event loop recorders for the management of arrhythmias in young ambulatory patients. Int J Cardiol. 2004;97:495–498.PubMedCrossRef

Joshi AK, Kowey PR, Prystowsky EN, Benditt DG, Cannom DS, Pratt CM, et al. First experience with a Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry (MCOT) system for the diagnosis and management of cardiac arrhythmia. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:878–881.PubMedCrossRef

Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Skanes AC, Yee R. Insertable loop recorder use for detection of intermittent arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004;27:657–664.PubMedCrossRef

Plummer CJ, Henderson S, Gardener L, McComb JM. The use of permanent pacemakers in the detection of cardiac arrhythmias. Europace. 2001;3:229–232.PubMedCrossRef

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Eriksson L, Pahlm O The clinical impact of long-term ECG recording. A retrospective study of 150 patients. Acta Medica Scand. 1980;208:355–358.CrossRef

11.

Rana MZ, Dunstan EJ, Allen SC. Ambulatory electrocardiography in elderly: an audit. Br J Clin Pract. 1989;43:341–342.PubMed

12.

McClennen S, Zimetbaum PJ, Ho KKL, Goldberger AL. Holtermonitoring: are two days better than one? Am J Cardiol. 2000;869:562–564.CrossRef

13.

Safe AF, Maxwell RT. Transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitoring for detection and treatment of cardiac arrhythmia. Postgrad Med J. 1990; 66:110–112.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Assayag P, Chailley O, Lehner JP, Brochet E, Demange J, Rezvani Y, et al. (Contribution of sequential voluntary ambulatory monitoring in the diagnosis of arhythmia. A multicenter study of 1287 symtomatic patients). Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1992;85:281–286.PubMed

15.

Schuchert A, Behrens G, Meinertz T. (Evaluation of infrequent episodes of palpitations with a patient-activated hand-held electrocardiograph). Z Kardiol. 2002;91:62–67.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Shanit D, Cheng A, Greenbaum RA. Telecardiology: supporting the decisionmaking process in general practice. J Telemed Telecare. 1996;2:7–13.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Summerton N, Mann S, Rigby A, Petkar S, Dhawan J. New-onset palpitations in general practice: assesing the discriminant value of items within the clinical history. Fam Pract. 2001;18:383–392.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Fogel RI, Evans JJ, Prystowsky EN. Utility and cost of event recorders in the diagnosis of palpitations, presyncope, and syncope. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:207–208.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Zimetbaum PJ, Kim KY, Josephson ME, Goldberger AL, Cohen DJ. Diagnostic yield and optimal duration of continuousloop event monitoring for the diagnosis of palpitations. A costeffectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:890–895.PubMed

20.

Brown AP, Dawkins KD, Davies JG. Detection of arrhythmias: use of a patient-activated ambulatory electrocardiogram device with a solid-state memory loop. Br Heart J. 1987;58:251–253.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Wu C-C, Hsieh M-H, Tai C-T, Chiang C-E, Yu W-C, Lin Y-K, et al. Utility of patient-activated cardiac event recorders in the detection of cardiac arrhythmias. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiol. 2003;8:117–120.CrossRef

22.

Grodman RS, Capone RJ, Most AS. Arrhythmia surveillance by transtelephonic monitoring: comparison with Holter monitoring in symptomatic ambulatory patients. Am Heart J. 1979;98:459–464.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Visser J, Schuilenburg RM. Trans-telephonic ECG monitoring in the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: A comparison with Holter electrocardiography. Ned Tijdschrift Geneeskund. 1984;128:397–401.

24.

Scalvini S, Zanelli E, Martinelli G, Baratti D, Giordano A, Glisenti F. Cardiac event recording yields more diagnoses than 24-hour Holter monitoring in patients with palpitations. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(Suppl 1):14–16.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Kus T, Nadeau R, Costi P, Molin F, Primeau R. Comparison of the diagnostic yield of Holter versus transtelephonic monitoring. Can J Cardiol. 1995;11:891–894.PubMed

26.

Kinlay S, Leitch JW, Neil A, Chapman BL, Hardy DB, Fletcher PJ. Cardiac event recorders yield more diagnoses and are more cost-effective than 48-hour Holter monitoring in patients with palpitations. A controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124(1 Pt 1):16–20.PubMed

27.

Klootwijk P, Leenders CM, Roelandt J. Usefulness of transtelephonic documentation of the electrocardiogram during sporadic symptoms suggestive of cardiac arrhythmias. Int J Cardiol. 1986;13:155–161.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Wu J, Kessler DK, Chakko S, Kessler KM. A cost-effectiveness strategy for transtelephonic arrhythmia monitoring. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:184–185.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Hoefman E, van Weert HC, Reitsma JB, Koster RW, Bindels PJ. Diagnostic yield of patient-activated loop recorders for detecting heart rhythm abnormalities in general practice: a randomised clinical trial. Fam Pract. 2005;22:478–484.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Roche F, Gaspoz JM, Da CA, Isaaz K, Duverney D, Pichot V, et al. Frequent and prolonged asymptomatic episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation revealed by automatic long-term event recorders in patients with a negative 24-hour Holter. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002;25:1587–1593.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Balmelli N, Naegeli B, Bertel O. Diagnostic yield of automatic and patient-triggered ambulatory cardiac event recording in the evaluation of patients with palpitations, dizziness, or syncope. Clin Cardiol. 2003;26:173–176.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Reiffel JA, Schwarzberg R, Murry M. Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24-hour holter monitors for arrhythmia detection. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:1055–1059.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Rothman SA, Laughlin JC, Seltzer J, Walia JS, Baman RI, Siouffi SY et al. The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:241–247.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Olson JA, Fouts AM, Padanilam BJ, Prystowsky EN. Utility of mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry for the diagnosis of palpitations, presyncope, syncope, and the assessment of therapy efficacy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:473–477.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Ng E, Stafford PJ, Ng GA. Arrhythmia detection by patient and auto-activation in implantable loop recorders. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2004;10:147–152.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Giada F, Gulizia M, Francese M, Croci F, Santangelo L, Santomauro M, et al. Recurrent unexplained palpitations (RUP) study comparison of implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic strategy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1951–1956.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Efficacy of diagnostic tools for detecting cardiac arrhythmias: systematic literature search
Auteurs: E. Hoefman
P.J.E. Bindels
H.C.P.M. van Weert
Publicatiedatum: 01-11-2010
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in: Netherlands Heart Journal / Uitgave 11/2010
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-010-0831-0

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2010

A retrocardiac mass unveiled by a can of soda

Upstream therapy in patients with early atrial fibrillation

The tale of the three sisters

Not too old to be closed…

Chest pain and angina pectoris – or the ugly swan and the beautiful duckling

An interesting electrocardiogram