Effects of temporal order and intentionality on reflective attention to words in noise | mijn-bsl Skip to main content

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Nieuws
Boeken
Tijdschriften
E-learning
Web-tv
Video
Audio

Tips voor Mijn BSL

UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 2/2022

08-03-2021 | Original Article

Effects of temporal order and intentionality on reflective attention to words in noise

Auteurs: T. M. Vanessa Chan, Bradley R. Buchsbaum, Claude Alain

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2022

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Speech perception in noise is a cognitively demanding process that challenges not only the auditory sensory system, but also cognitive networks involved in attention. The predictive coding theory has been influential in characterizing the influence of prior context on processing incoming auditory stimuli, with comparatively less research dedicated to “postdictive” processes and subsequent context effects on speech perception. Effects of subsequent semantic context were evaluated while manipulating the relationship of three target words presented in noise and the temporal position of targets compared to the subsequent contextual cue, demonstrating that subsequent context benefits were present regardless of whether the targets were related to each other and did not depend on the position of the target. However, participants instructed to focus on the relation between target and cue performed worse than those who did not receive this instruction, suggesting a disruption of a natural process of continuous speech recognition. We discuss these findings in relation to lexical commitment and stimulus-driven attention to short-term memory as mechanisms of subsequent context integration.
vorige artikel The effect of pain on reference memory for duration
volgende artikel The mnemonic effects of insight on false memory in the DRM paradigm
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
Alain, C., Cusimano, M., Garami, L., Backer, K. C., Habelt, B., Chan, V., & Hasher, L. (2018). Age-related differences in orienting attention to sound object representations. Neurobiology of Aging, 66, 1–11. PubMed
Backer, K. C., & Alain, C. (2012). Orienting attention to sound object representations attenuates change deafness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1554–1566. PubMed
Backer, K. C., & Alain, C. (2014). Attention to memory: Orienting attention to sound object representations. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 78(3), 439–452. PubMed
Backer, K. C., Binns, M., & Alain, C. (2015). Neural dynamics underlying attentional orienting to auditory representations in short-term memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(3), 1307–1318. PubMed
Bard, E. G., Shillcock, R. C., & Altmann, G. T. (1988). The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: Effects of subsequent context. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(5), 395–408.
Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press.
Chan, T. V., & Alain, C. (2019). Listening back in time: Does attention to memory facilitate word-in-noise identification? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(1), 253–269.
Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., & Hall, M. (1991). Effects of subsequent sentence context in auditory word recognition: Temporal and linguistic constraints. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(2), 234–250.
Davelaar, E. J., Haarmann, H. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., & Usher, M. (2006). Semantic similarity dissociates short- from long-term recency effects: Testing a neurocomputational model of list memory. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 323–334.
Davis, M. H., Ford, M. A., Kherif, F., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2011). Does semantic context benefit speech understanding through “top–down” processes? Evidence from time-resolved sparse fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(12), 3914–3932. PubMed
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. PubMed
Frankish, C. (2008). Precategorical acoustic storage and the perception of speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 815–836.
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. PubMed
Füllgrabe, C., & Rosen, S. (2016). On the (un)importance of working memory in speech-in-noise processing for listeners with normal hearing thresholds. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1268. PubMedPubMedCentral
Golestani, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Obleser, J., & Scott, S. K. (2013). Semantic versus perceptual interactions in neural processing of speech-in-noise. NeuroImage, 79, 52–61. PubMed
Gordon-Salant, S., & Cole, S. S. (2016). Effects of age and working memory capacity on speech recognition performance in noise among listeners with normal hearing. Ear and Hearing, 37(5), 593–602. PubMed
Griffin, I. C., & Nobre, A. C. (2003). Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(8), 1176–1194. PubMed
Guediche, S., Reilly, M., Santiago, C., Laurent, P., & Blumstein, S. E. (2016). An fMRI study investigating effects of conceptually related sentences on the perception of degraded speech. Cortex, 79, 57–74. PubMedPubMedCentral
Guediche, S., Salvata, C., & Blumstein, S. E. (2013). Temporal cortex reflects effects of sentence context on phonetic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(5), 706–718. PubMedPubMedCentral
Gwilliams, L., Linzen, T., Poeppel, D., & Marantz, A. (2018). In spoken word recognition, the future predicts the past. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(35), 7585–7599. PubMed
Hervais-Adelman, A., Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., & Carlyon, R. P. (2008). Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: Effects of feedback and lexicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(2), 460–474. PubMed
Kalikow, D. N., Stevens, K. N., & Elliott, L. L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61(5), 1337–1351. PubMed
Klatt, L.-I., Getzmann, S., Wascher, E., & Schneider, D. (2018). Searching for auditory targets in external space and in working memory: Electrophysiological mechanisms underlying perceptual and retroactive spatial attention. Behavioural Brain Research, 353, 98–107. PubMed
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. PubMedPubMedCentral
Lim, S.-J., Wöstmann, M., & Obleser, J. (2015). Selective attention to auditory memory neurally enhances perceptual precision. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(49), 16094–16104. PubMed
Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(2), 203–208.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10(1), 29–63.
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–86. PubMed
McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2009). Within-category VOT affects recovery from “lexical” garden paths: Evidence against phoneme-level inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 65–91. PubMedPubMedCentral
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227. PubMed
Nelson, D., McEvoy, C., & Schreiber, T. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 402–407.
Obleser, J., & Kotz, S. A. (2010). Expectancy constraints in degraded speech modulate the language comprehension network. Cerebral Cortex, 20(3), 633–640. PubMed
Obleser, J., & Kotz, S. A. (2011). Multiple brain signatures of integration in the comprehension of degraded speech. NeuroImage, 55(2), 713–723. PubMed
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Alain, C., & Schneider, B. A. (2017). Older adults at the cocktail party in the auditory system at the cocktail party (pp. 227–259). Springer.
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M. (1995). How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(1), 593–608. PubMed
Rönnberg, J., Holmer, E., & Rudner, M. (2019). Cognitive hearing science and ease of language understanding. International Journal of Audiology, 58(5), 247–261. PubMed
Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A., Sörqvist, P., Danielsson, H., Lyxell, B., Dahlström, Ö., Signoret, C., Stenfelt, S., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Rudner, M. (2013). The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 31. PubMedPubMedCentral
Scherer, D., & Wentura, D. (2018). Combining the post-cue task and the perceptual identification task to assess parallel activation and mutual facilitation of related primes and targets. Experimental Psychology, 65(2), 84–97. PubMed
Sheldon, S., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Schneider, B. A. (2008). Priming and sentence context support listening to noise-vocoded speech by younger and older adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(1), 489–499. PubMed
Sohoglu, E., Peelle, J. E., Carlyon, R. P., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(25), 8443–8453. PubMed
Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26(2), 212–215.
Szostak, C. M., & Pitt, M. A. (2013). The prolonged influence of subsequent context on spoken word recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(7), 1533–1546.
Wallis, G., Stokes, M., Cousijn, H., Woolrich, M., & Nobre, A. C. (2015). Frontoparietal and cingulo-opercular networks play dissociable roles in control of working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(10), 2019–2034. PubMed
Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167(3917), 392–393. PubMed
Warren, R. M., & Sherman, G. L. (1974). Phonemic restorations based on subsequent context. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 150–156.
Wingfield, A., Alexander, A. H., & Cavigelli, S. (1994). Does memory constrain utilization of top-down information in spoken word recognition? Evidence from normal aging. Language and Speech, 37(3), 221–235. PubMed
Zekveld, A. A., Rudner, M., Johnsrude, I. S., Festen, J. M., Van Beek, J. H., & Rönnberg, J. (2011). The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise. Ear and Hearing, 32(6), e16–e25. PubMed
Zekveld, A. A., Rudner, M., Johnsrude, I. S., Heslenfeld, D. J., & Rönnberg, J. (2012). Behavioral and fMRI evidence that cognitive ability modulates the effect of semantic context on speech intelligibility. Brain and Language, 122(2), 103–113. PubMed
Zimmermann, J. F., Moscovitch, M., & Alain, C. (2016). Attending to auditory memory. Brain Research, 1640, 208–221. PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Effects of temporal order and intentionality on reflective attention to words in noise
Auteurs
T. M. Vanessa Chan
Bradley R. Buchsbaum
Claude Alain
Publicatiedatum
08-03-2021
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01494-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2022

Psychological Research 2/2022 Naar de uitgave

Original Article

Cognitively demanding stimuli can acquire positive valence

Original Article

Two processing stages of the SNARC effect

Original Article

The contributions of working memory domains and processes to early mathematical knowledge between preschool and first grade

Original Article

Space, time and number: common coding mechanisms and interactions between domains

Original Article

Mindfulness and false memories: state and dispositional mindfulness does not increase false memories for naturalistic scenes presented in a virtual environment

Original Article

Partial repetition between action plans delays responses to ideomotor compatible stimuli