Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 12/2021

Open Access 24-06-2021

Effects of school-based mindfulness intervention on health-related quality of life: moderating effect of gender, grade, and independent practice in cluster randomized controlled trial

Auteurs: Maarit Lassander, Mirka Hintsanen, Sakari Suominen, Sari Mullola, Tero Vahlberg, Salla-Maarit Volanen

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 12/2021

Abstract

Object

We investigated the impact of a school-based 9-week mindfulness program vs. active control program (relaxation) and inactive control group on children’s self-reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) moderated by gender, grade, and independent practice.

Method

In total 3519 (50/50% boys/girls) Finnish students aged 12–15 years from 56 schools were randomized into mindfulness intervention, active, and inactive control groups. HRQoL was measured at baseline, at 9 weeks, and at 26 weeks and analyzed with multilevel linear modeling.

Results

Significant improvement on HRQoL was found (β = mean difference) (β = 1.587, 95% CI 0.672–2.502, p < 0.001) after 9 weeks and at 26 weeks of follow-up among students in the mindfulness group as compared to the active control group. Moderating effects on HRQoL were found for gender, grade, and independent practice: girls, 7th and 8th grade students, and students with regular independent mindfulness practice benefited most.

Conclusions

Gender and developmental stage may moderate the effects of mindfulness interventions on HRQoL and offer guidance in designing effective promotive interventions for children and adolescents.

Trial Registration Information

Healthy Learning Mind—a school-based mindfulness and relaxation program: a study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) ISRCTN18642659 retrospectively registered on 13 October 2015. The full trial protocol can be accessed at http://​rdcu.​be/​t57S.
Opmerkingen

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-021-02868-4.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Children’s satisfaction or happiness in various life domains can be assessed with Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measures [43, 46]. HRQoL is often applied as an outcome measure for children’s immediate life experiences in intervention evaluation and typically includes domains, such as physical and psychological well-being, family/peer support, and well-being in school [46]. However, there are very few studies examining how to generally improve quality of life without linking it to functional impairment or illness following medical or psychosocial interventions [50]. There is also a definitive lack of studies that would examine the impact of mindfulness-based intervention on HRQoL incorporating a controlled experimental design with follow-ups beyond the end of the intervention.
For the past decade, mindfulness-based school interventions have been found to produce small (effect size g = 0.22–0.40) or mixed results [23, 26] in the well-being of children and adolescents on a variety of measures, such as cognition, stress, anxiety and depression, and psychological well-being [8, 17, 18, 42]. This lack of consistency (for reviews see [10, 33]), raises questions about the potential moderators for observed effects [19, 41].
HRQoL is a subjective and multidimensional concept [46] across multiple systems of function (family, peer groups, school, community). These dimensions affect or are affected by health and provide generic understanding of subjective health and well-being [15, 40]. HRQoL is particularly well-rounded measure for children and adolescents, as it takes into account the spheres of individual experience, family, and school environment [37, 47, 50].
Previous research has found consistent gender differences suggesting that girls have poorer HRQoL in general compared to boys. Boys report higher HRQoL, namely, on the dimensions of physical and psychological well-being, and parents’ relation and autonomy [34, 39]. There is an established, cross-cultural effect of HRQoL decreasing with age [36, 39].

Mindfulness practice and its moderators

Mindfulness consists of self-regulation of attention maintained in immediate experience and practicing the qualities of curiosity, openness, and acceptance directed toward these experiences [32, 41]. Research on mindfulness suggests that females, both adults and adolescents, in general benefit more from mindfulness interventions, especially in terms of psychological well-being [12, 13, 27]. As the academic pressure and social media use place increasing demands to students mental health [28]; [31], school-based mindfulness programs teach directing attention and encourage acceptance toward emerging emotions [21], higher self-compassion, and self-acceptance [4, 7, 24]. For adolescents, mindfulness practice may also lessen the detrimental self-focus in challenging situations [5] and support adaptive development [2].
There is still limited evidence on the moderating effect of age on the effects of mindfulness practice [10]. One study [44] found that 13-year-olds (age when Finnish students transfer from primary to middle school) seemed to benefit more from mindfulness over relaxation compared to 12-year-olds and 14–15-year-olds in terms of socioemotional functioning. A recent meta-analysis suggests that interventions delivered during late adolescence (among 15–18-years-old) had the largest effects (in comparison with ages 6–14) on mental health and well-being outcomes, whereas gender differences were not found [10].
What comes to independent mindfulness practice, so far, we know very little about its significance for children and adolescent well-being. Some research suggests [44] that among 12–15-year-olds regular independent practice (almost daily) enhanced the intervention effects, i.e., increased resilience and socioemotional functioning. Among adults, in turn, a recent meta-analysis [38] found a small but consistent association between more frequent formal practice and positive intervention outcomes, presenting a wide range of psychological measures.

Relaxation as an active control

Relaxation training has often been applied as an active control intervention when examining the effects of mindfulness [25]; [30]. Both relaxation and mindfulness training reduce anxiety and may increase positive mood states, but mindfulness-based interventions may also reduce negative reactivity to ruminative thoughts [16, 22].

Present study

In the current cluster randomized study, we examine effects of mindfulness-based intervention (stop and breathe) [20] as compared with standard relaxation program “Relax” and inactive control group on HRQoL moderated by grade, gender, and independent practice. We hypothesize that (1) mindfulness intervention improves the HRQoL of 12–15-year-old children (6th–8th grades) [8, 17, 49]; (2) girls will benefit more from the intervention compared with boys [26, 44]; (3) adolescents starting a new school phase will benefit more from intervention compared to other age groups [44],and (4) more intensive independent practice is associated with higher intervention effects in terms of HRQoL [38, 49]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first controlled study with follow-up continuing past the immediate post-intervention assessments exploring the effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on HRQoL. We also address current gaps in the literature, regarding how to improve general quality of life in adolescent population and how the moderating effects of age and independent practice can affect the outcomes.

Methods

The study is cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participating schools were randomly allocated to an intervention, active control (relaxation), or inactive control group [45].

Participants

Study data were gathered in 2014–2015. Participants were invited from 247 schools in 14 cities/municipalities in Southern Finland. Among contacted schools 56 (24%) chose to participate (Fig. S1). Participants were sixth, seventh, and eighth graders (age 12–15) in Finnish comprehensive school.

Procedure

The ethical review board of the University of Helsinki (approval 1/2014) reviewed the study plan. A consent to participate was requested from all headteachers for randomization, intervention, and data collection. A written informed consent was requested from all students and their parents for data collections and the study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration. Participants could withdraw their participation at any point without giving any reason. Data handling and analyses were performed according to the EU General Data Protection Regulation, and personal identification of the participants was removed from all data.
The participating schools were first recruited and then randomized before the baseline data collection. The schools were randomly assigned to intervention schools (N = 25 schools with 94 classes), active control schools (N = 24 schools with 85 classes), and inactive control schools (N = 7 schools with 31 classes). Inactive control group was included in study design to ensure comparability with other mindfulness intervention studies, which usually only include an inactive control group. The main comparison was done with the active control group, ensuring that we can measure non-specific changes due to being part of an intervention. Whole class participated in the designated intervention/control. Classes in the intervention and in the active control groups were informed about participation in a 9-week program called “Skills for Wellbeing,” taught by trained facilitators. The participants were blinded as to whether they were selected to intervention or active control program.

Mindfulness intervention

The intervention, 9-week mindfulness program Stop and Breathe [20] began after baseline measurements. This program includes nine weekly 45-min group sessions and short home practices (the recommended amount of practice being 5–6 times per week, approx. 3–15 min at a time) and is designed to improve emotional awareness, sustained attention, and attentional and emotional regulation. Preliminary research suggests it to be effective in decreasing depressive symptoms, lowering stress, and enhancing psychological well-being [29]. Sessions started with a psychoeducational introduction to the themed lesson (e.g., directing attention, experiencing difficult thoughts, and difficult emotions), including short formal or informal practices, group discussion, and ending with a longer practice. Mindfulness home practices were available to download from the course website [45].

Control groups

Active control group underwent a 9-week standardized relaxation program “Relax.” The aim of the Relax program is to enhance students’ relaxation skills and holistic well-being. The frequency and duration of the weekly sessions (i.e., dose) of the Relax program is equal to the mindfulness program, including nine weekly 45-min group sessions and home practices (the recommended amount of practice being 5–6 times per week). The sessions consisted of psychoeducational presentations relating to well-being (e.g. stress, sleep, nutrition), relaxation exercises (e.g., progressive muscle relaxation, calming breathing, and visualization), pair and group discussions, and group assignments.
In the inactive control group, the participants followed normal school curriculum without any interventions. All groups filled in the same research questionnaires at baseline, at 9 weeks, and at 26 weeks of follow-up.

Measures

Questionnaires and other tests were completed as a part of the RCT in 2014–15. Questionnaires were filled in at baseline, 9 weeks, and 6 months during the normal school hours.
To measure Health-Related Quality of Life we chose KINDL-R, a generic instrument for assessing HRQoL in children and adolescents aged 3–17 [39]. The questionnaire has been developed based on interviews with children and adolescents to reflect their own priorities. KINDL-R consists of 5 domains (physical and psychological well-being, self-esteem, family, friends, and school) each indicated with 5 self-report items assessed on a 5-point likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree; transformed score range 0–100) and giving the time frame of past week. Higher scores indicate better HRQoL. In the current study baseline Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of KINDL-R was 0.89.
The amount of intervention specific independent practice was self-reported at follow-up questionnaires. The respondents were divided into four groups: high frequency practice (nearly every day, n = 46), moderate frequency practice (once a week, n = 55), low frequency practice (once or twice a month n = 104), and infrequent practice (only few times, n = 733).

Data analysis

The sample size was estimated to detect the mean difference of 0.2 standard deviation units (effect size = 0.2) on main outcomes between intervention and control groups with 80% power and the two-tailed 5% level of significance. The clustering of outcomes within schools was taken into account, assuming an intra-cluster (intra-school) correlation coefficient of 0.03 and assumed that on average 60 children in each school will complete the study. The required sample size was estimated to be 1090 children per group, and allowing for about 10% dropout rate, the study required 1200 children per group and total of 2400 children to be recruited. Using the same assumptions to detect the mean difference of 0.3 standard deviation units (effect size of 0.3) between intervention and non-treatment group, the required sample size was estimated to be 486 children per group, and allowing for about 10% drop-out rate, the study required 540 children in the non-treatment group.
The effect of intervention on HRQoL was analyzed with multilevel models to account for the clustered nature of the data. Four-level models with time at level 1, student at level 2, students in a particular classroom at level 3, and school at level 4 were fitted. Intra-class correlation (ICC), which is the proportion of the total variance explained by each level, was calculated for student, classroom, and school level. ICCs at the school level were low (ICC < 0.01) and variances of random intercepts for school level were non-significant, despite the school level being the unit for randomization. Thus, school-level variance was excluded from the final multilevel models and a three-level model with time at level 1, student at level 2 (ICC = 0.62), and classroom at level 3 (ICC = 0.06) was used. In addition to variance components at the classroom level and student level, the covariance between random components was also included in the models (not shown in the tables), if estimable. Maximum likelihood estimation was used to obtain unbiased and efficient parameter estimates for data with missing values in the follow-up measurements.
The modifying effect of gender and grade, i.e., whether the intervention effect was different depending on gender or grade, was analyzed with multilevel modeling. The modifying effect of independent practice (all self-motivated practice taking place outside the program sessions) underwent similar analysis.
Multilevel linear models included the main effects of group, time, gender, and grade. The intervention effect was examined by interaction terms between group (intervention vs. active control and intervention vs. inactive control) and time (9 weeks vs. baseline and 26 weeks vs. baseline). To show positive intervention effects the estimates for interaction effects (group × 9 weeks and group × 26 weeks) were required to be positive for HRQoL. Interaction effects indicated the change in HRQoL in the intervention group compared to the active control and non-treatment groups. To analyze the modifying effect of gender and grade, i.e., whether the intervention effect (intervention vs. active control and intervention vs. non-treatment) was different depending on gender or grade, the second-order interaction term group × grade × time or group × gender × time was entered to the model. To examine whether the intervention effect differed depending on the continuing independent practice intensity after the intervention compared to the active control and non-treatment groups, the interaction term practice intensity group × time was entered to the model.
Multilevel linear modeling was done with MLwiN Version 2.35 (Centre for multilevel modelling, University of Bristol) and other analysis with the SAS System for Windows 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Two-sided statistical tests with a 5% significance level were used, and no adjustments were made for multiplicity.

Results

Sample characteristics

Out of 3519 students participating in this study 2754 students provided at least one measurement of quality of life at baseline, at 9 weeks, or at 26 weeks of follow-up, 1220 in intervention, 1181 in active control, and 353 in inactive control group (see Table 1).
Table 1
Descriptive statistics for KINDL-R subscales at baseline, 9 weeks, and 26 weeks for all students and by gender
Intervention group
Active control group
Non-treatment group
Scale variable
N
Baseline
Mean (SD)
N
9 weeks
Mean (SD)
N
26 weeks
Mean (SD)
N
Baseline
Mean (SD)
N
9 weeks
Mean (SD)
N
26 weeks
Mean (SD)
N
Baseline
Mean (SD)
N
9 weeks
Mean (SD)
N
26 weeks
Mean (SD)
All students
Physical well-being
1203
69.56 (21.95)
1156
70.91 (20.86)
949
71.88 (20.26)
1170
70.41 (21.53)
1095
70.53 (20.37)
994
71.88 (20.91)
353
60.93 (22.39)
319
73.01 (20.10)
305
71.83 (20.75)
Emotional well-being
1220
75.85 (15.74)
1152
75.88 (15.66)
957
75.95 (15.85)
1181
76.42 (15.31)
1104
74.20 (16.29)
1012
75.53 (16.54)
352
75.37 (15.62)
320
76.11 (16.41)
306
75.63 (15.60)
Self-esteem
1216
62.84 (20.04)
1155
65.03 (20.16)
953
65.57 (19.31)
1179
62.14 (19.92)
1102
63.84 (19.97)
1012
64.81 (20.65)
353
63.17 (20.35)
320
64.84 (20.28)
305
65.53 (20.66)
Family
1216
78.60 (16.46)
1150
79.28 (16.90)
951
78.81 (18.85)
1177
79.30 (16.35)
1101
77.51 (17.65)
1008
79.27 (16.70)
351
81.02 (14.79)
321
80.98 (16.13)
306
80.57 (16.69)
Friends
1210
70.60 (15.90)
1156
70.95 (16.66)
948
71.62 (17.04)
1168
71.10 (16.24)
1088
70.12 (16.40)
1010
71.76 (17.63)
348
70.04 (16.54)
319
71.10 (16.22)
304
72.13 (16.57)
School
1209
64.11 (18.08)
1158
63.11 (17.87)
955
63.08 (18.55)
1169
63.96 (18.43)
1100
60.43 (18.01)
1010
62.03 (18.98)
349
64.76 (15.98)
320
65.10 (17.51)
304
63.29 (17.55)
Boys
Physical well-being
594
74.00 (20.01)
561
74.18 (19.62)
458
75.20 (19.93)
554
74.43 (19.86)
511
72.27 (20.40)
472
75.84 (19.42)
170
73.82 (21.58)
152
77.30 (18.29)
150
77.00 (17.84)
Emotional well-being
609
76.11 (15.54)
558
75.37 (16.40)
464
74.57 (17.01)
560
76.68 (15.55)
514
72.72 (17.33)
484
75.88 (16.55)
171
77.92 (13.78)
152
77.84 (15.59)
151
76.70 (16.17)
Self-esteem
608
65.11 (20.03)
562
67.60 (20.33)
462
67.28 (20.41)
559
63.89 (20.09)
514
65.28 (20.23)
485
67.08 (20.71)
171
66.89 (18.75)
153
67.85 (20.53)
150
67.79 (21.33)
Family
608
77.16 (16.47)
559
77.52 (17.43)
463
75.69 (18.81)
558
77.98 (16.68)
512
74.54 (18.70)
483
77.62 (17.09)
170
80.58 (14.74)
153
79.93 (16.46)
151
79.66 (16.22)
Friends
603
69.52 (16.25)
560
69.03 (17.19)
460
68.18 (17.83)
557
69.83 (16.43)
510
67.30 (16.89)
482
69.24 (17.71)
168
71.24 (16.27)
152
71.03 (15.09)
150
71.78 (16.40)
School
603
65.50 (18.01)
562
64.61 (16.89)
463
64.22 (18.72)
554
65.43 (17.47)
513
61.94 (17.54)
483
64.17 (17.48)
169
68.31 (31.92)
153
67.78 (17.15)
151
66.80 (16.09)
Girls
Physical well-being
609
65.23 (22.88)
594
67.83 (21.54)
491
68.80 (20.09)
616
66.79 (22.33)
583
69.03 (20.25)
522
68.30 (21.57)
183
66.31 (22.58)
167
69.11 (20.91)
154
66.82 (22.22)
Emotional well-being
611
75.59 (15.93)
593
76.41 (14.91)
493
77.24 (14.58)
621
76.18 (15.10)
588
75.57 (15.11)
528
75.21 (16.53)
181
72.95 (16.86)
168
74.54 (17.01)
154
74.58 (15.06)
Self-esteem
608
60.57 (19.81)
592
62.62 (19.73)
491
63.97 (18.09)
620
60.55 (19.66)
586
62.51 (19.63)
527
62.72 (20.40)
182
59.67 (21.22)
167
62.08 (19.69)
154
63.34 (19.88)
Family
608
80.04 (16.33)
590
81.00 (16.18)
488
81.76 (16.37)
619
80.49 (15.97)
587
80.12 (16.24)
525
80.79 (16.21)
181
81.43 (14.86)
168
81.93 (15.81)
154
81.41 (17.19)
Friends
607
71.68 (15.49)
595
72.78 (15.94)
488
74.87 (15.58)
611
72.26 (15.99)
576
72.63 (15.58)
528
74.05 (17.25)
180
68.92 (16.75)
167
71.17 (17.23)
153
72.34 (16.76)
School
606
62.73 (18.06)
595
61.72 (18.66)
492
62.01 (18.34)
615
62.64 (19.17)
585
59.12 (18.35)
527
60.06 (20.08)
180
61.42 (17.07)
167
62.64 (17.53)
152
59.76 (18.31)

Baseline measurements

There was no difference between mindfulness intervention, active control (i.e., relaxation), and inactive control group at baseline in HRQoL. The mean HRQoL for all participants was 69.72 (SD = 13.11), ranging from 13.54 to 100. Boys had higher HRQoL compared to girls at baseline (β = 1.249, 95% CI 0.408–2.090, p = 0.004). Mean scores by grades were 71.66 (SD = 13.07) for 6th grade, 69.91 (SD = 13.21) for 7th grade, and 68.05 (SD = 12.88) for 8th grade.

Overall mindfulness intervention effects on HRQoL for all students

Table 2 shows the intervention effects on HRQoL adjusted for grade and gender. Results show a positive intervention effect between mindfulness intervention and the active control group at 9 weeks (Group × T9 β = 1.587, 95% CI 0.672–2.502, p < 0.001) due to slight increase in HRQoL scores in the intervention group and decrease in the control group. These effects wane at 26 weeks (β = 0.953, 95% CI − 0.221–2.127, p = 0.112).
Table 2
Results of multilevel models: intervention effects on KINDL total among all students, by gender, and by grade
All
Boys
Girls
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
 
Estimate
95% CI
P value
Estimate
95% CI
Estimate
95% CI
Estimate
95% CI
Estimate
95% CI
Estimate
95% CI
Change by 9 weeks
 
Group (Int vs. 0) × T9
−0.958
(−2.303; 0.387)
0.163
−0.597
(−2.708; 1.514)
−1.348
(−3.008; 0.312)
−1.598
(−4.189; 0.993)
0.572
(−1.890; 3.034)
0.145
(−2.091; 2.381)
Group (Int vs. Control) × T9
1.587
(0.672; 2.502)
 < 0.001
2.156**
(0.719; 3.593)
1.159*
(0.032; 2.286)
0.544
(−1.051; 2.139)
4.087***
(1.692; 6.482)
1.856**
(0.660; 3.052)
Change by 26 weeks
 
Group (Int vs. 0) × T26
−0.159
(−1.841; 1.523)
0.853
−0.982
(−3.604; 1.640)
0.52
(−1.434; 2.474)
1.414
(−1.508; 4.336)
1.393
(−1.465; 4.251)
0.59
(−2.254; 3.434)
Group (Int vs. Control) × T26
0.953
(−0.221; 2.127)
0.112
−0.143
(−1.987; 1.701)
2.028**
(0.685; 3.371)
−0.307
(−2.087; 1.473)
3.498*
(0.754; 6.242)
1.686*
(0.093; 3.279)
CI confidence interval
Statistically significant (p < 0.05) estimates from Wald tests are bolded. Statistical significance of estimates: *p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.05

Mindfulness intervention effects by gender

Positive mindfulness intervention effects were found for HRQoL at 9 weeks for girls (β = 1.159, 95% CI 0.032–2.286, p = 0.044) and for boys (β = 2.156, 95% CI 0.719–3.593, p = 0.003) compared with the active control group. For boys the intervention effect was significant due to decreased HRQoL scores in the active control group. Gender modified the intervention effects on HRQoL at 26 weeks (group × gender × T26, p = 0.030). Positive intervention effects were found for HRQoL at 26 weeks for girls (β = 2.028, 95% CI 0.685–3.371, p = 0.003) compared with the active control group. There were no intervention effects for boys at 26 weeks (β = − 0.143, 95% CI − 1.987–1.701, p = 0.879). There were no gender differences in intervention attendance or in the amount of independent practice.

Mindfulness intervention effects by grade

The effect of intervention was significantly different between 7 and 6th grade students at 9 weeks (group × grade × T9, p = 0.022), there were no other effects between grades. There were no significant intervention effects for 6th grade students. Positive intervention effects were found for 7th grade students at 9 weeks (β = 4.087, 95% CI 1.692–6.482, p < 0.001) and at 26 weeks (β = 3.498, 95% CI 0.754–6.242, p = 0.013), as well as 8th grade students at 9 weeks (β = 1.856, 95% CI 0.660–3.052, p = 0.002) and at 26 weeks (β = 1.686, 95% CI 0.093–3.279, p = 0.038) compared to the active control group.

Intervention effects by independent practice

Table 3 shows the intervention effects on HRQoL adjusted for gender and grade by independent practice intensity. The intervention was found most effective for students who had practiced mindfulness nearly every day compared to the active control and inactive control group. Students with high frequency mindfulness practice had positive intervention effects in HRQoL at 9 weeks (β = 4.462, 95% CI 1.248–7.676, p = 0.007) and at 26 weeks (β = 5.441, 95% CI 2.058–8.824, p = 0.002) compared with the active control group and at 26 weeks (β = 4.333, 95% CI 0.742–7.924, p = 0.018) compared with the inactive control group. Descriptive statistics for different levels of practice are shown in Table 4.
Table 3
Results of multilevel models: intervention effects on KINDL total by practice intensity
 
Estimate
95% CI
Change by 9 weeks
Group (Int0 vs. 0) × T9
−1.092
(−2.527; 0.343)
Group (Int1 vs. 0) × T9
−1.775
(−4.135; 0.585)
Group (Int2 vs. 0) × T9
−1.233
(−4.385; 1.919)
Group (Int3 vs. 0) × T9
1.916
(−1.445; 5.277)
Group (Int0 vs. Control) × T9
1.453**
(0.410; 2.496)
Group (Int1 vs. Control) × T9
0.770
(−1.374; 2.914)
Group (Int2 vs. Control) × T9
1.313
(−1.682; 4.308)
Group (Int3 vs. Control) × T9
4.462**
(1.248; 7.676)
Change by 26 weeks
Group (Int0 vs. 0) × T26
−0.309
(−2.055; 1.437)
Group (Int1 vs. 0) × T26
−1.642
(−4.300; 1.016)
Group (Int2 vs. 0) × T26
1.045
(−2.383; 4.473
Group (Int3 vs. 0) × T26
4.333*
(0.742; 7.924)
Group (Int0 vs. Control) × T26
0.800
(−0.462; 2.062)
Group (Int1 vs. Control) × T26
−0.533
(−2.901; 1.835)
Group (Int2 vs. Control) × T26
2.154
(− 1.055; 5.363)
Group (Int3 vs. Control) × T2
5.441**
(2.058; 8.824)
Statistically significant (p < 0.05) estimates from Wald tests are bolded
CI confidence interval
Practice intensity after the intervention was classified as follows:
Int0 a couple of times during 6 months, Int1 once/twice a month, Int2  at least once a week, Int3 nearly every day, Control Active control group, 0 = Non-treatment group
Statistical significance of estimates: *p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.05
Table 4
Intervention dosage by group and subscale
Intervention dosage
Group
Subscale variable
Baseline
Almost everyday
Intervention
 
N
Mean (SD)
  
Physical well-being
40
68.65 (20.27)
  
Emotional well-being
42
72.47 (18.83)
  
Self-esteem
42
66.82 (21.76)
  
Family
42
77.53 (17.08)
  
Friends
42
66.57 (18.17)
  
School
42
63.39 (l19.98)
At least once a week
Intervention
 
  
Physical well-being
47
69.95 (22.82)
  
Emotional well-being
47
73.67 (15.36)
  
Self-esteem
46
60.46 (20.75)
  
Family
46
82.61 (14.25)
  
Friends
46
66.03 (13.92)
  
School
45
62.08 (17.18)
Once or twice a month
Intervention
 
  
Physical well-being
94
72.23 (20.76)
  
Emotional well-being
97
76.76 (14.17)
  
Self-esteem
95
65.53 (20.01)
  
Family
96
78.75 (16.25)
  
Friends
95
69.87 (14.69)
  
School
95
64.41 (17.87)
Only few times
Intervention
 
  
Physical well-being
675
70.05 (21.43)
  
Emotional well-being
682
76.51 (14.79)
  
Self-esteem
681
62.90 (19.25)
  
Family
682
79.05 (16.40)
  
Friends
677
71.42 (15.38)
  
School
678
64.96 (17.74)
No dosage
Active Control
 
  
Physical well-being
1170
70.41 (21.53)
  
Emotional well-being
1181
76.42 (15.31)
  
Self-esteem
1179
62.14 (19.92)
  
Family
1177
79.30 (16.35)
  
Friends
1168
71.10 (16.24)
  
School
1169
63.96 (18.43)
No dosage
Non-treatment
 
  
Physical well-being
353
69.93 (22.39)
  
Emotional well-being
352
75.37 (15.62)
  
Self-esteem
353
63.17 (20.35)
  
Family
351
81.02 (14.79)
  
Friends
348
70.04 (16.54)
  
School
349
64.76 (15.98)

Effect sizes

The largest intervention effects on HRQoL were observed in the highest intensity practice group at 9 weeks (d = 0.35) and 26 weeks (d = 0.43) compared to the active control and at 26 weeks (d = 0.34) compared to the inactive control group (Table 5). The intervention increased HRQoL in the 7th grade students compared to the active control group at 9 weeks (d = 0.32) and at 26 weeks (d = 0.27).
Table 5
Effect sizes (95% confidence intervals) for intervention group compared to control and non-treatment groups at 9 weeks (T9) and 26 weeks (T26)
 
Intervention vs. control
Intervention vs. non-treatment
Outcome
T9
T26
T9
T26
HRQoL
All
0.12 (0.04; 0.20)
0.07 (−0.01; 0.15)
−0.07 (−0.19; 0.04)
−0.01 (−0.13; 0.11)
Boys
0.17 (0.06; 0.29)
−0.01 (−0.13; 0.10)
−0.05 (−0.22; 0.12)
−0.08 (−0.25; 0.09)
Girls
0.09 (−0.02; 0.20)
0.16 (0.04; 0.27)
−0.10 (−0.27; 0.06)
0.04 (−0.13; 0.21)
Grade 6
0.04 (−0.09; 0.17)
−0.02 (−0.15; 0.11)
−0.13 (−0.33; 0.08)
0.11 (−0.09; 0.32)
Grade 7
0.32 (0.11; 0.53)
0.27 (0.06; 0.48)
0.04 (−0.18; 0.27)
0.11 (−0.11; 0.33)
Grade 8
0.15 (0.03; 0.26)
0.13 (0.02; 0.25)
0.01 (−0.21; 0.23)
0.05 (−0.17; 0.27)
The highest intensity
0.35 (0.04; 0.66)
0.43 (0.12; 0.74)
0.15 (−0.17; 0.47)
0.34 (0.02; 0.66)
Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were calculated as the multilevel model adjusted intervention
Effect (group × T9 or group × T26) divided by the unadjusted pooled standard deviation at the baseline
Cohen d = 0.2 is considered as a ‘small’ effect size, d = 0.5 as a ‘medium’ effect size

Discussion

This study aimed to examine whether a mindfulness-based intervention program shows unique effect on children’s self-reported health-related quality of life among 12–15-year-old students. We found that a mindfulness intervention vs. relaxation-based active control group has an immediate intervention effect on HRQoL for all participants that does not last to 26-week follow-up. However, when we examined the gender and grade effects, we found a significant improvement among girls and 7th and 8th grade students at 9 weeks and at 26 weeks. We also discovered the frequency of independent practice was associated with higher HRQoL. It seems that the mindfulness intervention has the potential to improve general HRQoL in school children, but it does not impact all students equally.

Mindfulness intervention has selective beneficial effects on HRQoL

During the past few years there have been a number of RCTs on the effectiveness of mindfulness interventions in schools [8, 17, 49]. The evidence base has strengthened from small trials, where numbers were too few to consider age and gender effects, and controls were mostly passive non-treatment groups, if at all existent. Research so far suggests that mindfulness training has small to moderate effect on psychological, subjective well-being among children and adolescents. However, there are some studies where this effect has waned [23, 26, 33] when similar control has been provided. In the present study, we found a significant effect for all participants in HRQoL after 9 weeks of intervention, due to decreased HRQoL in the active control group. There was no effect compared to the smaller inactive control group. The lack of effect compared to the inactive control may be due to insufficient size of the inactive group in cluster randomized research, as school-specific factors have greater potential to influence the results. As the effect was not consistently found at 26 weeks, we suggest that the mindfulness intervention may contribute to a short-term protective impact on HRQoL for all, but optimally would be supported by regular practice and enhanced by receptive gender or grade for long-term benefits.

Mindfulness has significant gender-mediated effects on HRQoL

Mindfulness-based intervention increased girls’ HRQoL significantly compared to the control and non-treatment groups and the effect persisted from immediate post-intervention at 9 weeks to follow-up at 26 weeks. These results align with existing evidence of more pronounced effects among women [12, 13, 27] and girls [26].
There are affect-related risk factors that seem to be gender biased, i.e., females may be more prone to affective processing of negative emotions [35] and tend to engage in maladaptive coping strategies, e.g., rumination and self-critique [1, 9]. As mindfulness interventions address and improve positive affectivity, adaptive coping and self-compassion, as well as decrease rumination, they may be by nature more targeted toward girls [3, 41]. There were no gender differences in intervention attendance or in independent practice; thus, girls did not improve more by practicing or getting a higher dose of treatment.
There was a significant difference between the boys in intervention and active control group at 9 weeks. This was due to decreased HRQoL scores in the active control group and the effect did not persist in follow-up at 26 weeks. There was no significant difference between the boys in intervention and inactive control group at 9 weeks. Therefore, we suggest that as compared to the girls there is a more nuanced effect in boys, of which we can only speculate at this stage. It may be that the stress related to approaching end of term exams (at 9 weeks of follow-up end of term was 4–6 weeks away) might momentarily weaken the HRQoL in the active control group, whereas mindfulness-based training, which is designed to alleviate the stress and offer some strategies to cope with exam anxiety, helps preserve HRQoL. This might show as a short-term buffer effect in the intervention group.

Mindfulness has significant grade-mediated effects on HRQoL

Our findings of significant grade-mediated effects may offer guidance in age-optimal delivery of mindfulness curriculum. Volanen et al. [44] found that 7th graders benefitted more from mindfulness intervention in terms of resilience and psychosocial well-being, compared with 6th and 8th graders. Our results are in line with this finding and suggest that grade-related differences may be connected to transition from lower to upper school and not only to grade as such. The beginning of upper elementary school brings on changes in physical environment, supporting adults, peers, and educational demands [6, 48]. Grade differences at baseline also show that older children have significantly lower HRQoL. Start of upper school at the age of 13 may be a particularly opportune time for mindfulness training to alleviate the age-related decline in HRQoL.

Regular mindfulness practice boosts HRQoL

Our results indicate that the dosage of independent practice in the intervention group was related to the changes in HRQoL. Previous studies Stop and Breathe program have found varying rates of continuous (once a week or more) practice, from 20% [29] to 12% [23]. According to our findings 10% of students, who reported their level of mindfulness practice, were practicing once a week or more after 6 months. About 4% of students were practicing nearly every day after 6 months, and these students also reported the most significant gains in HRQoL. There were no differences in baseline HRQoL between different practice groups (Table 2).

Practical implication and directions for future research

The results of this study shed more light to school-based mindfulness interventions and their benefits. We discovered that it is more beneficial for girls and older students to take part in a mindfulness program in terms of HRQoL. We conclude that mindfulness interventions offer positive outcomes for girls in risk of anxiety, depression, and poor HRQoL [14]. We also propose that the current mindfulness-based interventions are not as effective with boys as compared to girls, and further research is warranted on developing more gender-tailored approaches. Adherence to independent practice during and after the intervention is generally low [23], so it could be recommended that school-based regular practice would follow the intervention period to boost the training. For example, there is some evidence that intensive practice may reduce the significance of gender as a moderator, showing equal benefits for boys and girls [44]. Further research on student experience with mixed methods may also shed more light on motivating factors and possible challenges [11].

Methodological considerations

Some limitations should be noted. The number of participants was reduced by drop-outs (attrition 5.9%, with no significant differences between intervention and control groups), which was expected considering drop-out rates in similar trials. Boys were more likely to drop out than girls (63.9% of drop-outs) and students whose mother language was other than Finnish/Swedish were also more likely to drop out (14.6% of drop-outs). Other differences were small and not significant. The inactive control group was smaller than the intervention and active control groups (n = 353) and the active control group (n = 1181) was slightly under the power calculations for primary outcomes (n = 1200 in each group), which reduces statistical power. We also note that we did not control the experience in mindfulness at baseline, allowing the students varying backgrounds. However, the participating schools had not received previous mindfulness training.
The strengths in this study are related to the strong research design. That is, the use of active and inactive control groups as well as post-intervention follow-ups. Furthermore, the analyses were statistically accounted for classroom and school effect, and we utilized an evidence-based mindfulness intervention (Stop and Breathe) as well as established HRQoL measure. Randomization was conducted at school level, which reduces the risk of contamination between groups. In addition, the participants were blinded regarding their selection to intervention or active control program.

Conclusions

Our study indicated that mindfulness-based intervention improves HRQoL for girls and 7th and 8th graders, but the effects do not extend to both genders and all examined age groups. Girls are known to have poorer HRQoL in general and older students are facing a challenging change both in terms of adolescent development and social environment. These results highlight the possibilities of mindfulness-based training for students, who may have more need for adaptive emotional skills to cope in their teenage years. Noting that the effects of mindfulness training continued to grow for girls and regular practitioners at 26 weeks of follow-up, we could strengthen the promotive health care approach in schools by developing evidence-based and specific long-term strategies. As regular independent practice seems to benefit both genders, we should explore ways to promote opportunities for school-based practice and aim to follow up the effects beyond immediate assessments.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Bijlagen

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Allgood-Merten, B., Lewinsohn, P., & Hops, H. (1990). Sex differences in adolescent depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 55–63 PubMed Allgood-Merten, B., Lewinsohn, P., & Hops, H. (1990). Sex differences in adolescent depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 55–63 PubMed
2.
go back to reference Amada, N., & Shane, J. (2019). Mindfulness as a promoter of adaptive development in adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research Review, 4, 93 Amada, N., & Shane, J. (2019). Mindfulness as a promoter of adaptive development in adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research Review, 4, 93
3.
go back to reference Anderson, N. D., Lau, M. A., Segal, Z. V., & Bishop, S. R. (2007). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and attentional control. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 14(6), 449–463 Anderson, N. D., Lau, M. A., Segal, Z. V., & Bishop, S. R. (2007). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and attentional control. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 14(6), 449–463
4.
go back to reference Baer, R. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–143 Baer, R. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–143
5.
go back to reference Beauchemin, J., Hutchins, T. L., & Patterson, F. (2008). Mindfulness meditation may lessen anxiety, promote social skills, and improve academic performance among adolescents with learning disabilities. Complementary Health Practice Review, 13(1), 34–45 Beauchemin, J., Hutchins, T. L., & Patterson, F. (2008). Mindfulness meditation may lessen anxiety, promote social skills, and improve academic performance among adolescents with learning disabilities. Complementary Health Practice Review, 13(1), 34–45
6.
go back to reference Benner, A. (2011). The transition to high school: Current knowledge, future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 299 PubMedPubMedCentral Benner, A. (2011). The transition to high school: Current knowledge, future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 299 PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211 Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211
8.
go back to reference Burke, C. (2010). Mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents: A preliminary review of current research in an emergent field. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 19(2), 133–144 Burke, C. (2010). Mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents: A preliminary review of current research in an emergent field. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 19(2), 133–144
9.
go back to reference Butler, L., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender differences in response to depressed mood in a college sample. Sex Roles, 30, 331–346 Butler, L., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender differences in response to depressed mood in a college sample. Sex Roles, 30, 331–346
10.
go back to reference Carsley, D., Khoury, B., & Heath, N. (2018). Effectiveness of mindfulness interventions for mental health in schools: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 9, 693 Carsley, D., Khoury, B., & Heath, N. (2018). Effectiveness of mindfulness interventions for mental health in schools: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 9, 693
11.
go back to reference Costello, E., & Lawler, M. (2014). An exploratory study of the effects of mindfulness on perceived levels of stress among school-children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. International Journal of Emotional Education, 6(2), 21–39 Costello, E., & Lawler, M. (2014). An exploratory study of the effects of mindfulness on perceived levels of stress among school-children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. International Journal of Emotional Education, 6(2), 21–39
12.
go back to reference de Vibe, M., Solhaug, I., & Tyssen, R. (2015). Does personality moderate the effects of mindfulness training for medical and psychology students? Mindfulness, 6, 281 PubMed de Vibe, M., Solhaug, I., & Tyssen, R. (2015). Does personality moderate the effects of mindfulness training for medical and psychology students? Mindfulness, 6, 281 PubMed
13.
go back to reference Desbordes, G., Negi, L., Pace, T., Wallace, B., Raison, C., & Schwartz, E. (2012). Effects of mindful-attention and compassion meditation training on amygdala response to emotional stimuli in an ordinary, non-meditative state. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 292 PubMedPubMedCentral Desbordes, G., Negi, L., Pace, T., Wallace, B., Raison, C., & Schwartz, E. (2012). Effects of mindful-attention and compassion meditation training on amygdala response to emotional stimuli in an ordinary, non-meditative state. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 292 PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Else-Quest, N., Hyde, J., Goldsmith, H., & Van Hulle, C. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 33 PubMed Else-Quest, N., Hyde, J., Goldsmith, H., & Van Hulle, C. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 33 PubMed
15.
go back to reference Erhart, M., Ellert, U., Kurth, B., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2009). Measuring adolescents’ HRQoL via self reports and parent proxy reports. An evaluation of the psychometric properties of both versions of the KINDL-R instrument. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(77), 1–12 Erhart, M., Ellert, U., Kurth, B., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2009). Measuring adolescents’ HRQoL via self reports and parent proxy reports. An evaluation of the psychometric properties of both versions of the KINDL-R instrument. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(77), 1–12
16.
go back to reference Feldman, G., Greeson, J., & Senville, J. (2010). Differential effects of mindful breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, and loving-kindness meditation on decentering and negative reactions to repetitive thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(10), 1002–1011 PubMedPubMedCentral Feldman, G., Greeson, J., & Senville, J. (2010). Differential effects of mindful breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, and loving-kindness meditation on decentering and negative reactions to repetitive thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(10), 1002–1011 PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Felver, J. C., Celis-de Hoyos, C. E., Tezanos, K., & Singh, N. N. (2016). A systematic review of mindfulness-based interventions for youth in school settings. Mindfulness, 7(1), 34 Felver, J. C., Celis-de Hoyos, C. E., Tezanos, K., & Singh, N. N. (2016). A systematic review of mindfulness-based interventions for youth in school settings. Mindfulness, 7(1), 34
18.
go back to reference Flook, L., Smalley, S., Kitil, J. M., Galla, B. M., Kaiser-Greenland, S., Locke, J., et al. (2010). Effects of mindful awareness practices on executive functions in elementary school children. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 26(1), 70–95 Flook, L., Smalley, S., Kitil, J. M., Galla, B. M., Kaiser-Greenland, S., Locke, J., et al. (2010). Effects of mindful awareness practices on executive functions in elementary school children. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 26(1), 70–95
19.
go back to reference Gould, L., Dariotis, J., Mendelson, T., & Greenberg, M. (2012). A school-based mindfulness intervention for urban youth: Exploring moderators of intervention effects. Community Psychology, 40, 968–982 Gould, L., Dariotis, J., Mendelson, T., & Greenberg, M. (2012). A school-based mindfulness intervention for urban youth: Exploring moderators of intervention effects. Community Psychology, 40, 968–982
20.
go back to reference Huppert, F. A., & Johnson, D. M. (2010). A controlled trial of mindfulness training in schools: The importance of practice for an impact on well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 264 Huppert, F. A., & Johnson, D. M. (2010). A controlled trial of mindfulness training in schools: The importance of practice for an impact on well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 264
21.
go back to reference Izard, C. (2001). Emotional intelligence or adaptive emotions? Emotion, 1(3), 249–257 PubMed Izard, C. (2001). Emotional intelligence or adaptive emotions? Emotion, 1(3), 249–257 PubMed
22.
go back to reference Jain, S., Shapiro, S., Swanick, S., Roesch, S. C., Mills, P. J., Bell, I., & Schwartz, G. E. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training: Effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and distraction. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(1), 11–21 PubMed Jain, S., Shapiro, S., Swanick, S., Roesch, S. C., Mills, P. J., Bell, I., & Schwartz, G. E. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training: Effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and distraction. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(1), 11–21 PubMed
23.
go back to reference Johnson, C., Burke, C., Brinkman, S., & Wade, T. (2016). Effectiveness of a school-based mindfulness program for transdiagnostic prevention in young adolescents. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 81, 1–11 PubMed Johnson, C., Burke, C., Brinkman, S., & Wade, T. (2016). Effectiveness of a school-based mindfulness program for transdiagnostic prevention in young adolescents. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 81, 1–11 PubMed
24.
go back to reference Johnson, C., Burke, C., Brinkman, S., & Wade, T. (2017). A randomized controlled evaluation of a secondary school mindfulness program for early adolescents: Do we have the recipe right yet? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 99, 37–46 PubMed Johnson, C., Burke, C., Brinkman, S., & Wade, T. (2017). A randomized controlled evaluation of a secondary school mindfulness program for early adolescents: Do we have the recipe right yet? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 99, 37–46 PubMed
25.
go back to reference Johnson, S., Gur, R. M., David, Z., & Currier, E. (2015). One-session mindfulness meditation: A randomized controlled study of effects on cognition and mood. Mindfulness, 6(1), 88–98 Johnson, S., Gur, R. M., David, Z., & Currier, E. (2015). One-session mindfulness meditation: A randomized controlled study of effects on cognition and mood. Mindfulness, 6(1), 88–98
26.
go back to reference Kang, Y., Rahrig, H., Eichel, K., Niles, H., Rocha, T., Lepp, N., Gold, J., & Britton, W. B. (2018). Gender differences in response to a school-based mindfulness training intervention for early adolescents. Journal of School Psychology, 68, 163–176 PubMedPubMedCentral Kang, Y., Rahrig, H., Eichel, K., Niles, H., Rocha, T., Lepp, N., Gold, J., & Britton, W. B. (2018). Gender differences in response to a school-based mindfulness training intervention for early adolescents. Journal of School Psychology, 68, 163–176 PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Katz, D., & Toner, B. (2013). A systematic review of gender differences in the effectiveness of mindfulness-based treatments for substance use disorders. Mindfulness, 4, 318 Katz, D., & Toner, B. (2013). A systematic review of gender differences in the effectiveness of mindfulness-based treatments for substance use disorders. Mindfulness, 4, 318
28.
go back to reference Keles, B., & McCrae, N. G. (2020). A systematic review: The influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents, international journal of adolescence and youth. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 79–93 Keles, B., & McCrae, N. G. (2020). A systematic review: The influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents, international journal of adolescence and youth. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 79–93
29.
go back to reference Kuyken, W., Weare, K., Ukoumunne, O. C., Vicary, R., Motton, N., Burnett, R., Cullen, C., Hennelly, S., & Huppert, F. (2013). Effectiveness of the mindfulness in schools programme: Non-randomised controlled feasibility study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 203(2), 126–131 Kuyken, W., Weare, K., Ukoumunne, O. C., Vicary, R., Motton, N., Burnett, R., Cullen, C., Hennelly, S., & Huppert, F. (2013). Effectiveness of the mindfulness in schools programme: Non-randomised controlled feasibility study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 203(2), 126–131
30.
go back to reference Lancaster, S. (2016). Mindfulness and relaxation: A comparison of brief, laboratory-based interventions. Mindfulness, 7(3), 614–621 Lancaster, S. (2016). Mindfulness and relaxation: A comparison of brief, laboratory-based interventions. Mindfulness, 7(3), 614–621
31.
go back to reference Löfstedt, P., García-Moya, I., Corell, M., Paniagua, C., Samdal, O., Välimaa, R., Lyyra, N., Currie, D., & Rasmussen, M. (2020). School satisfaction and school pressure in the WHO European region and north America: An analysis of time trends (2002–2018) and patterns of co-occurrence in 32 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(6), S59–S69 Löfstedt, P., García-Moya, I., Corell, M., Paniagua, C., Samdal, O., Välimaa, R., Lyyra, N., Currie, D., & Rasmussen, M. (2020). School satisfaction and school pressure in the WHO European region and north America: An analysis of time trends (2002–2018) and patterns of co-occurrence in 32 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(6), S59–S69
32.
go back to reference Lutz, A., Slagter, H. A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. (2008). Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(4), 163 PubMedPubMedCentral Lutz, A., Slagter, H. A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. (2008). Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(4), 163 PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Maynard, B., Solis, M., Miller, V., & Brendel, K. (2017). Mindfulness-based interventions for improving cognition, academic achievement, behavior and socioemotional functioning of primary and secondary students. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13, 1–144 Maynard, B., Solis, M., Miller, V., & Brendel, K. (2017). Mindfulness-based interventions for improving cognition, academic achievement, behavior and socioemotional functioning of primary and secondary students. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13, 1–144
34.
go back to reference Meade, T., & Dowswell, E. (2016). Adolescents’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) changes over time: A three year longitudinal study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, 1–8 Meade, T., & Dowswell, E. (2016). Adolescents’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) changes over time: A three year longitudinal study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, 1–8
35.
go back to reference Mendrek, A., Potvin, S., & Lungu, O. (2015). Sex differences in effective fronto-limbic connectivity during negative emotion processing. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 62, 180–188 PubMed Mendrek, A., Potvin, S., & Lungu, O. (2015). Sex differences in effective fronto-limbic connectivity during negative emotion processing. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 62, 180–188 PubMed
36.
go back to reference Michel, G., Bisegger, C., Fuhr, D. C., & Abel, T. (2009). Age and gender differences in health-related quality of life of children and adolescents in Europe: A multilevel analysis. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 18, 1147–1157. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-009-9538-3. CrossRef Michel, G., Bisegger, C., Fuhr, D. C., & Abel, T. (2009). Age and gender differences in health-related quality of life of children and adolescents in Europe: A multilevel analysis. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 18, 1147–1157. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-009-9538-3. CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Parsons, C., Crane, C., Parsons, L., Fjorback, L., & Kuyken, W. (2017). Home practice in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of participants’ mindfulness practice and its association with outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 95, 29–41 PubMedPubMedCentral Parsons, C., Crane, C., Parsons, L., Fjorback, L., & Kuyken, W. (2017). Home practice in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of participants’ mindfulness practice and its association with outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 95, 29–41 PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (1998). Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the german KINDL: First psychometric and content analytical results. Quality of Life Research, 7, 399 PubMed Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (1998). Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the german KINDL: First psychometric and content analytical results. Quality of Life Research, 7, 399 PubMed
40.
go back to reference Ronen, G., & Rosenbaum, P. (Eds.). (2013). Life quality outcomes in children and young people with neurological and developmental conditions. London: Mac Keith Press. Ronen, G., & Rosenbaum, P. (Eds.). (2013). Life quality outcomes in children and young people with neurological and developmental conditions. London: Mac Keith Press.
41.
go back to reference Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Astin, J., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386 PubMed Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Astin, J., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386 PubMed
42.
go back to reference Tan, L. B. G. (2016). A critical review of adolescent mindfulness-based programs. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 21(2), 193–207 PubMed Tan, L. B. G. (2016). A critical review of adolescent mindfulness-based programs. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 21(2), 193–207 PubMed
43.
go back to reference Varni, J., Limbers, C., & Burwinkle, T. (2006). Literature review: Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric oncology: Hearing the voices of the children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 1151–1163 Varni, J., Limbers, C., & Burwinkle, T. (2006). Literature review: Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric oncology: Hearing the voices of the children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 1151–1163
44.
go back to reference Volanen, S., Lassander, M., Hankonen, N., Santalahti, P., Hintsanen, M., Simonsen, N., Raevuori, A., Mullola, S., Vahlberg, T., But, A., & Suominen, S. (2020). Healthy learning mind—effectiveness of a mindfulness program on mental health compared to a relaxation program and teaching as usual in schools: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 260, 660–669 PubMed Volanen, S., Lassander, M., Hankonen, N., Santalahti, P., Hintsanen, M., Simonsen, N., Raevuori, A., Mullola, S., Vahlberg, T., But, A., & Suominen, S. (2020). Healthy learning mind—effectiveness of a mindfulness program on mental health compared to a relaxation program and teaching as usual in schools: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 260, 660–669 PubMed
45.
go back to reference Volanen, S., Lassander, M., Hankonen, N., Santalahti, P., Hintsanen, M., Simonsen, N., & Raevuori, A. (2016). Healthy learning mind—a school-based mindfulness and relaxation program: A study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychology, 4(1), 35 PubMedPubMedCentral Volanen, S., Lassander, M., Hankonen, N., Santalahti, P., Hintsanen, M., Simonsen, N., & Raevuori, A. (2016). Healthy learning mind—a school-based mindfulness and relaxation program: A study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychology, 4(1), 35 PubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Wallander, J., & Koot, H. (2016). Quality of life in children: A critical examination of concepts, approaches, issues, and future directions. Clinical Psychology Review, 45, 131–143 PubMed Wallander, J., & Koot, H. (2016). Quality of life in children: A critical examination of concepts, approaches, issues, and future directions. Clinical Psychology Review, 45, 131–143 PubMed
47.
go back to reference Wallander, J., Schmitt, M., & Koot, H. (2001). Quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: Issues, instruments, and applications. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 571–585 PubMed Wallander, J., Schmitt, M., & Koot, H. (2001). Quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: Issues, instruments, and applications. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 571–585 PubMed
48.
go back to reference West, P., Sweeting, H., & Young, R. (2010). Transition matters: Pupils’ experiences of the primary–secondary school transition in the west of scotland and consequences for well-being and attainment. Research Papers in Education, 25(1), 21–50 West, P., Sweeting, H., & Young, R. (2010). Transition matters: Pupils’ experiences of the primary–secondary school transition in the west of scotland and consequences for well-being and attainment. Research Papers in Education, 25(1), 21–50
49.
go back to reference Zenner, C., Herrnleben-Kurz, S., & Walach, H. (2014). Mindfulness-based interventions in schools—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 603 PubMedPubMedCentral Zenner, C., Herrnleben-Kurz, S., & Walach, H. (2014). Mindfulness-based interventions in schools—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 603 PubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Zullig, K., Matthews, M., Gilman, R., Valois, R., & Huebner, E. (2010). Generic quality of life measures for children and adolescents. In V. Preedy & R. Watson (Eds.), Handbook of disease burdens and quality of life measures. (pp. 2423–2452). New York: Springer. Zullig, K., Matthews, M., Gilman, R., Valois, R., & Huebner, E. (2010). Generic quality of life measures for children and adolescents. In V. Preedy & R. Watson (Eds.), Handbook of disease burdens and quality of life measures. (pp. 2423–2452). New York: Springer.
Metagegevens
Titel
Effects of school-based mindfulness intervention on health-related quality of life: moderating effect of gender, grade, and independent practice in cluster randomized controlled trial
Auteurs
Maarit Lassander
Mirka Hintsanen
Sakari Suominen
Sari Mullola
Tero Vahlberg
Salla-Maarit Volanen
Publicatiedatum
24-06-2021
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02868-4