Top

Gepubliceerd in:

18-03-2015

Effects of genetic and environmental risk assessment feedback on colorectal cancer screening adherence

Auteurs: Ronald E. Myers, Karen Ruth, Sharon L. Manne, James Cocroft, Randa Sifri, Barry Ziring, Desiree Burgh, Eric Ross, David S. Weinberg

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 5/2015

Abstract

Little is known about the impact of genetic and environmental risk assessment (GERA) feedback on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. In a recently completed randomized trial, primary care patients received GERA feedback based on a blood test for genetic polymorphisms and serum folate level (GERA Group) versus usual care (Control Group). Subsequently, participants were offered CRC screening. Among participants who received GERA feedback, being at elevated risk was negatively associated with prospective CRC screening adherence. Secondary analyses of data from this study were performed to identify independent predictors of adherence among participants who received GERA feedback. We obtained baseline survey, follow-up survey, and endpoint medical records data on sociodemographic background, knowledge, psychosocial characteristics, risk status, and adherence for 285 GERA Group participants. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of CRC screening adherence. Following a 6-month outcomes observation period, we also conducted two focus groups with GERA Group participants to assess their perceptions of GERA risk feedback and screening. Content analyses of focus group data were evaluated to gain insights into participant response to risk feedback. Overall, half of GERA Group participants adhered to screening within 6 months after randomization. Multivariable analyses showed a statistically significant interaction between race and GERA feedback status relative to screening adherence (p = 0.043). Among participants who received average risk feedback, adherence was comparable among whites (49.7 %) and nonwhites (54.1 %); however, among those at elevated risk, adherence was substantially higher among whites (66.7 %) compared to nonwhites (33.3 %). Focus group findings suggest that whites were more likely than nonwhites to view elevated risk feedback as a prompt to screen. In response to receiving elevated risk feedback, nonwhites were more likely than whites to report feeling anxiety about the likelihood of being diagnosed with CRC. Further research is needed to explore race-related CRC screening differences in response to GERA feedback.

vorige artikel Genetic counseling content: How does it impact health behavior?

volgende artikel Measuring health-related problem solving among African Americans with multiple chronic conditions: application of Rasch analysis

Baier, M., Calonge, N., Cutter, G., McClatchey, M., Schoentgen, S., Hines, S., … Ahnen, D. (2000). Validity of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior. Cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention, 9, 229–232.

Bennett, P., Phelps, C., Hilgart, J., Hood, K., Brain, K., & Murray, A. (2011). Concerns and coping during cancer genetic risk assessment. Psycho-oncology. doi:10.1002/pon.1938.PubMedCentral

Bloss, C. S., Wineinger, N. E., Darst, B. F., Schork, N. J., & Topol, E. J. (2013). Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up. Journal of Medical Genetics, 50, 393–400.CrossRefPubMed

Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3, 22–43.CrossRef

Cella, D., Hughes, C., Peterman, A., Chang, C. H., Peshkin, B. N., Schwartz, M. D., & Lerman, C. (2002). A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: The Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) Questionnaire. Health Psychology, 21, 564–572.CrossRefPubMed

Cioffi, D. (1990). Beyond attentional strategies: A cognitive-perceptual model of somatic interpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 25–41.CrossRef

Collins, R. E., Wright, A. J., & Marteau, T. M. (2011). Impact of communicating personalized genetic risk information on perceived control over risk: A systematic review. Genetics in Medicine, 13, 273–277.CrossRefPubMed

Croyle, R. T. (1990). Biased appraisal of high blood pressure. Preventive Medicine, 19, 40–44.CrossRefPubMed

Croyle, R. T., Sun, Y. C., & Hart, M. (1997). Processing risk factor information: Defensive biases in health-related judgments and memory. In K. J. Petrie & J. A. Weinman (Eds.), Perceptions of health and illness (pp. 267–483). New York, NY: Overseas Publishers Association.

Croyle, R. T., Sun, Y., & Louie, D. H. (1993). Psychological minimization of cholesterol test results: Moderators of appraisal in college students and community residents. Health Psychology, 12, 503–507.CrossRefPubMed

Ghazarian, A. A., Simonds, N. I., Bennett, K., Pimentel, C. B., Ellison, G. L., Gillanders, E. M., … Mechanic, L. E. (2013). A review of NCI’s extramural grant portfolio: Identifying opportunities for future research in genes and environment in cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 22, 501–507.

Giovannucci, E., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Hunder, D. J., Fuchs, C., Rosner, B. A., … Willett, W. C. (1998). Multivitamin use, folate, and colon cancer in women in the Nurses’ Health Study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 129, 517–524.

Green, E. D., & Guyer, M. S. (2011). Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside. Nature, 470, 204–213.CrossRefPubMed

Griffith, K. A., McGuire, D. B., Royak-Schaler, R., Plowden, K. O., & Steinberger, E. K. (2008). Influence of family history and preventive health behaviors on colorectal cancer screening in African Americans. Cancer, 113, 276–285.CrossRefPubMed

Heshka, J. T., Palleschi, C., Howley, H., Wilson, B., & Wells, P. S. (2008). A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 10, 19–32.CrossRefPubMed

Hilgart, J., Phelps, C., Bennett, P., Hood, K., Brian, K., & Murray, A. (2010). “I have always believed I was at high risk…” The role of expectation in emotional responses to the receipt of an average, moderate or high cancer genetic risk assessment result: A thematic analysis of free-text questionnaire comments. Familial Cancer, 9, 469–477.CrossRefPubMed

Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of event scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.CrossRefPubMed

Howell, J. L., & Shepperd, J. A. (2013). Reducing health-information avoidance through contemplation. Psychological Science, 24, 1696–1703.CrossRefPubMed

Iselin, M. G., & Addis, M. E. (2003). Effects of perceived etiology on perceived helpfulness of treatments for depression. Cognitive Therapy Research, 27, 2005–2222.CrossRef

Jemmott, J. B., Ditto, P. H., & Croyle, R. T. (1986). Judging health status: Effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 899–905.CrossRefPubMed

Keku, T, Millikan, R., Worley, K., Winkel, S., Eaton, A., Biscocho, L., … Sandler, R. (2002). 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase codon 677 and 1298 polymorphisms and colon cancer in African Americans and whites. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 11, 1611–1621.

Kennedy, D. A., Stern, S. J., Matok, I., Moretti, M. E., Sarkar, M., Adams-Webber, T., et al. (2012). Folate intake, MTHFR Polymorphisms, and the risk of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, Article ID 952508.

Kim, Y. I. (1999). Folate and cancer prevention: A new medical application of folate beyond hyperhomocysteinemia and neural tube defects. Nutrition Reviews, 57, 314–321.PubMed

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.CrossRefPubMed

LeMarchand, L. L., Wilkens, L. R., Kolonel, L. N., & Henderson, B. E. (2005). The MTHFR C677T polymorphism and colorectal cancer: The multiethnic cohort study. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 14, 1198–1203.CrossRef

Ma, J., Stampfer, M. J., Giovannucci, E., Artigas, C., Hunter, D. J., Fuchs, C., … Rozen, R. (1997). Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism, dietary interactions, and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Research, 57, 1098–1102.

McBride, C. M., Bryan, A. D., Bray, M. S., Swan, G. E., & Green, E. D. (2013). Health behavior change: Can genomics improve behavioral adherence? American Journal of Public Health, 102, 401–405.CrossRef

McBride, C. M., Koehly, L. M., Sanderson, S. C., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2010). The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: Will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 89–103.CrossRefPubMed

McCaul, K. D., Thiesse-Duffy, E., & Wilson, P. (1992). Coping with medical diagnosis: The effects of at-risk versus disease labels over time. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1340–1355.CrossRef

Meiser, B. (2005). Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: An update of the literature. Psycho-Oncology, 14, 1060–1074.CrossRefPubMed

Myers, R. E. (2005). Decision counseling in cancer prevention and control. Health Psychology, 24, S71–S77.CrossRefPubMed

Myers, R. E., Bittner-Fagan, H., Daskalakis, C., Sifri, R., Vernon, S. W., Cocroft, J., & Andrel, J. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of a tailored navigation and a standard intervention in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 22, 109–117.CrossRefPubMed

Myers, R. E., Daskalakis, C., Kunkel, J. S., Cocroft, J. R., Riggio, J. M., Capkin, M., & Braddock, C. H. (2011a). Mediated decision support in prostate cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial of decision counseling. Patient Education and Counseling, 83, 240–246.CrossRefPubMed

Myers, R. E., Hyslop, T., Sifri, R., Bittner-Fagan, H, Katurakes, N., Crocroft, J., … Wolf, T. (2008). Tailored navigation in colorectal cancer screening. Medical Care, 46, S123–S131.

Myers, R. E., Jepson, C., Ross, E., Jepson, C., Wolf, T., Balshem, A., … Leventhal, H. (1994). Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening. Preventive Medicine, 23, 142–151.

Myers, R. E., Manne, S. L., Wilfond, B., Sifri, R., Ziring, B., Wolf, T., … Weinberg, D. S. (2011). A randomized trial of genetic and environmental risk assessment (GERA) for colorectal cancer risk in primary care: Trial design and baseline findings. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 32, 25–31.

Myers, R. E., Sifri, R., Daskalakis, C., DiCarlo, M., Ramakrishnan Geethakumari, P., Cocroft, J., … Vernon, S. W. (2014). Increasing colon cancer screening in primary care among African Americans. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. doi:10.1093/jnci/dju344.

Myers, R. E., Sifri, R., Hyslop, T., Rosenthal, M., Vernon, S. W., Cocroft, J., … Wender, R. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer, 110, 2083–2091.

Palaniappan, L. P., Maxwell, A. E., Crespi, C. M., Wong, E. C., Shing, J., & Wang, E. J. (2011). Population colorectal cancer screening estimates: Comparing self-report to electronic health record data in California. International Journal of Cancer Research and Prevention, 4, 28540.

Phelps, C., Bennett, P., Hood, K., Brain, K., & Murray, A. (2013). A self-help coping intervention can reduce anxiety and avoidant health behaviours whilst waiting for cancer genetic risk information: Results of a phase III randomized trial. Psycho-Oncology, 22, 837–844.CrossRefPubMed

Pyszczynski, T., Hold, K., & Greenberg, J. (1987). Depression, self-focused attention, and expectancies for positive and negative future life events for self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 994–1001.CrossRefPubMed

Ransohoff, D. F., & Khoury, M. J. (2010). Personal genomics: Information can be harmful. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 40, 64–68.CrossRefPubMed

Renner, B. (2004). Biased reasoning: Adaptive responses to health risk feedback. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 384–396.CrossRefPubMed

Ryan, B. M., & Weir, D. G. (2001). Relevance of folate metabolism in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 138, 164–176.CrossRefPubMed

Scheuner, M. T., Sieverding, P., & Shekelle, P. G. (2008). Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult diseases: A systematic review. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 299, 1320–1334.CrossRefPubMed

Taioli, E., Garza, M. A., Ahn, Y. O., Bishop, D. T., Bost, J., Budai, B., … Little, J. (2009). Meta- and pooled analyses of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism and colorectal cancer: A HuGE-GSEC review. American Journal of Epidemiology, 15, 1207–1021.

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1998). Illusion and well-being: A social psychology perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.CrossRef

Turner, R. M. (1998). Adaptive reasoning for real-world problems: A schema-based approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Vernon, S.W., Bartholomew, L. K., McQueen, A., Bettencourt, J. L., Greisinger, A., Coan, S. P., … Myers, R. E. (2011). A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: Sometimes more is just the same. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 41, 284–299.

Vernon, S. W., Myers, R. E., & Tilley, B. C. (1997). Development and validation of an instrument to measure factors related to colorectal cancer screening adherence. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 6, 825–832.PubMed

Weinberg, D. S., Myers, R. E., Keenan, E., Ruth, K., Sifri, R., Ziring, B., … Manne, L. (2014). Gene environment risk assessment and colorectal cancer screening in an average risk population: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 537–545.

Titel: Effects of genetic and environmental risk assessment feedback on colorectal cancer screening adherence
Auteurs: Ronald E. Myers
Karen Ruth
Sharon L. Manne
James Cocroft
Randa Sifri
Barry Ziring
Desiree Burgh
Eric Ross
David S. Weinberg
Publicatiedatum: 18-03-2015
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9626-5

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2015

The roles of ethnicity, sex, and parental pain modeling in rating of experienced and imagined pain events

Social support buffering of the relation between low income and elevated blood pressure in at-risk African-American adults

Genetic test reporting enhances understanding of risk information and acceptance of prevention recommendations compared to family history-based counseling alone

Retraction Note to: Preference for immediate reinforcement over delayed reinforcement: relation between delay discounting and health behavior

Impact of melanoma genetic test reporting on perceived control over melanoma prevention

Intuition versus cognition: a qualitative exploration of how women understand and manage their increased breast cancer risk