Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2010

01-01-2010 | Original Article

Effects of element features on discrimination of relative numerosity: comparison of search symmetry and asymmetry pairs

Auteurs: Midori Tokita, Akira Ishiguchi

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

We investigated effects of element features on statistical description of relative frequency. In Experiment 1, we manipulated the proportion of two elements types forming a set and the set size and measured response time and the accuracy of relative numerosity discrimination. We did this with element pairs that had been shown to produce search symmetries or asymmetries in visual search task. We found that pop-out elements in the search asymmetry pair were numerically overestimated. In Experiment 2, we used sets of circles and circles with gaps to eliminate the possibility that the overestimation found in Experiment 1 was due to larger contour length of pop-out elements. In Experiment 3, we manipulated proportion of two elements types and the set size to measure point of subjective equality (PSE) and the slopes of z-score functions in relative numerosity discrimination to support the results of Experiments 1 and 2. The results generally showed that the proportion of pop-out elements is likely to be overestimated and that set size had no effect, suggesting that the types of features characterized by visual search could influence the accuracy and precision in discrimination of relative numerosity.
Literatuur
go back to reference Allik, J., Tuulmets, T., & Vos, P. G. (1991). Size invariance in visual number discrimination. Psychological Research, 53, 290–295.CrossRefPubMed Allik, J., Tuulmets, T., & Vos, P. G. (1991). Size invariance in visual number discrimination. Psychological Research, 53, 290–295.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Averbach, E. (1963). The span of apprehension as a function of exposure duration. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 60–64.CrossRef Averbach, E. (1963). The span of apprehension as a function of exposure duration. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 60–64.CrossRef
go back to reference Barth, H., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E. (2003). The construction of large number representations in adults. Cognition, 86, 201–221.CrossRefPubMed Barth, H., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E. (2003). The construction of large number representations in adults. Cognition, 86, 201–221.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Beck, D. M., & Kastner, S. (2005). Stimulus context modulates competition in human extrastriate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1110–1116.CrossRefPubMed Beck, D. M., & Kastner, S. (2005). Stimulus context modulates competition in human extrastriate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1110–1116.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Burgess, A., & Barlow, B. H. (1983). The precision of numerosity discrimination in arrays of random dots. Vision Research, 23, 811–820.CrossRefPubMed Burgess, A., & Barlow, B. H. (1983). The precision of numerosity discrimination in arrays of random dots. Vision Research, 23, 811–820.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cantlon, J. F., & Brannon, E. M. (2006). Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans. Psychological Science, 17, 401–406.CrossRefPubMed Cantlon, J. F., & Brannon, E. M. (2006). Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans. Psychological Science, 17, 401–406.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2004). Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1282–1294. Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2004). Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1282–1294.
go back to reference Dehaene, S. (1997). The Number Sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press. Dehaene, S. (1997). The Number Sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626–641.CrossRefPubMed Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626–641.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Durgin, F. H. (1995). Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 149, 149–169.CrossRef Durgin, F. H. (1995). Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 149, 149–169.CrossRef
go back to reference Hollands, J. G., & Spence, L. (2001). The discrimination of graphical elements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 413–431.CrossRef Hollands, J. G., & Spence, L. (2001). The discrimination of graphical elements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 413–431.CrossRef
go back to reference Hurewitz, F., Gelman, R., & Schnitzer, B. (2006). Sometimes area counts more than number. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 19599–19604.CrossRefPubMed Hurewitz, F., Gelman, R., & Schnitzer, B. (2006). Sometimes area counts more than number. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 19599–19604.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Julesz, B. (1984). A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision. Trends in Neuroscinece, 7, 41–45.CrossRef Julesz, B. (1984). A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision. Trends in Neuroscinece, 7, 41–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Kadosh, R. C., Kadosh, K. C., & Henik, A. (2008). When brightness counts: The neuronal correlate of mumerical–luminance interference. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 337–343.CrossRef Kadosh, R. C., Kadosh, K. C., & Henik, A. (2008). When brightness counts: The neuronal correlate of mumerical–luminance interference. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 337–343.CrossRef
go back to reference Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520.CrossRefPubMed Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nothdurft, H. C. (1993). The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues. Vision Research, 33, 1937–1958.CrossRefPubMed Nothdurft, H. C. (1993). The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues. Vision Research, 33, 1937–1958.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Reynolds, J. H., & Desmone, R. (2003). Interacting roles of attention and visual salience in V4. Neuron, 37, 853–863.CrossRefPubMed Reynolds, J. H., & Desmone, R. (2003). Interacting roles of attention and visual salience in V4. Neuron, 37, 853–863.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rubenstein, B. S., & Sagi, D. (1990). Spatial variability as a liming factor in texture-discrimination tasks: Implications for performance asymmetries. Journal of Optical Society of America, 7, 1632–1643.CrossRef Rubenstein, B. S., & Sagi, D. (1990). Spatial variability as a liming factor in texture-discrimination tasks: Implications for performance asymmetries. Journal of Optical Society of America, 7, 1632–1643.CrossRef
go back to reference Shuford, E. M. (1961). Percentage estimation of proportion as a function of element type, exposure time, and task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 430–436.CrossRef Shuford, E. M. (1961). Percentage estimation of proportion as a function of element type, exposure time, and task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 430–436.CrossRef
go back to reference Treisman, A. (2006). How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual Cognition, 14, 411–443.CrossRefPubMed Treisman, A. (2006). How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual Cognition, 14, 411–443.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.CrossRefPubMed Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence for search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15–48.CrossRefPubMed Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence for search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15–48.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Treisman, A., & Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285–310.CrossRef Treisman, A., & Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285–310.CrossRef
go back to reference Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 231–351.CrossRef Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 231–351.CrossRef
go back to reference Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80–102.CrossRefPubMed Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80–102.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Varey, C. A., Mellers, B. A., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1990). Judgments of proportion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 613–625.CrossRefPubMed Varey, C. A., Mellers, B. A., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1990). Judgments of proportion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 613–625.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wolfe, J. M. (1998). What do 1,000,000 trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9, 33–39.CrossRef Wolfe, J. M. (1998). What do 1,000,000 trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9, 33–39.CrossRef
go back to reference Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 381–389. Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 381–389.
Metagegevens
Titel
Effects of element features on discrimination of relative numerosity: comparison of search symmetry and asymmetry pairs
Auteurs
Midori Tokita
Akira Ishiguchi
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2010
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0183-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2010

Psychological Research 1/2010 Naar de uitgave