Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Highly demanding cognitive-motor tasks can be negatively influenced by the presence of auditory stimuli. The human brain attempts to partially suppress the processing of potential distractors in order that motor tasks can be completed successfully. The present study sought to further understand the attentional neural systems that activate in response to potential distractors during the execution of movements. Nineteen participants (9 women and 10 men) were administered isometric ankle-dorsiflexion tasks for 10 s at a light intensity. Electroencephalography was used to assess the electrical activity in the brain, and a music excerpt was used to distract participants. Three conditions were administered: auditory distraction during the execution of movement (auditory distraction; AD), movement execution in the absence of auditory distraction (control; CO), and auditory distraction in the absence of movement (stimulus-only; SO). AD was compared with SO to identify the mechanisms underlying the attentional processing associated with attentional shifts from internal association (task-related) to external (task-unrelated) sensory cues. The results of the present study indicated that the EMG amplitude was not compromised when the auditory stimulus was administered. Accordingly, EEG activity was upregulated at 0.368 s in AD when compared to SO. Source reconstruction analysis indicated that right and central parietal regions of the cortex activated at 0.368 s in order to reduce the processing of task-irrelevant stimuli during the execution of movements. The brain mechanisms that underlie the control of potential distractors during exercise were possibly associated with the activity of the frontoparietal network.
Altimari, L. R., Dantas, J. L., Bigliassi, M., Kanthack, T. F. D., Moraes, A. C., & Abrão, T. (2012). Influence of different strategies of treatment muscle contraction and relaxation phases on EMG signal processing and analysis during cyclic exercise. In Computational intelligence in electromyography analysis—a perspective on current applications and future challenges (pp. 97–116). Rijeka, Croatia: InTech. doi: 10.5772/50599.
Borg, G. A. V. (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 14, 377–381.
Brunetti, M., Della Penna, S., Ferretti, A., Del Gratta, C., Cianflone, F., Belardinelli, P., et al. (2008). A frontoparietal network for spatial attention reorienting in the auditory domain: A human fMRI/MEG study of functional and temporal dynamics. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1139–1147. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm145. CrossRefPubMed
Bullock, T., & Giesbrecht, B. (2014). Effects of acute exercise and aerobic fitness on selective attention during visual search. Frontiers in Physiology, 5, 1290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01290.
Cutsuridis, V. (2013). Cognitive models of the perception-action cycle: A view from the brain. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. doi: 10.1109/IJCNN.2013.6706713.
Desbordes, G., Negi, L. T., Pace, T. W. W., Wallace, B. A., Raison, C. L., & Schwartz, E. L. (2012). Effects of mindful-attention and compassion meditation training on amygdala response to emotional stimuli in an ordinary, non-meditative state. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 292. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00292. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Hommel, B. (2010). Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection. In B. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 121–140). London, UK: MIT Press. CrossRef
Lee, A. K. C., Rajaram, S., Xia, J., Bharadwaj, H., Larson, E., Hämäläinen, M. S., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2013). Auditory selective attention reveals preparatory activity in different cortical regions for selection based on source location and source pitch. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 190. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00190. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Noakes, T. D., St Clair Gibson, A., & Lambert, E. V. (2005). From catastrophe to complexity: A novel model of integrative central neural regulation of effort and fatigue during exercise in humans: summary and conclusions. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39, 120–124. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.010330. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Pollak, K. A., Swenson, J. D., Vanhaitsma, T. A., Hughen, R. W., Jo, D., Light, K. C., et al. (2014). Exogenously applied muscle metabolites synergistically evoke sensations of muscle fatigue and pain in human subjects. Experimental Physiology, 99, 358–366. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.075812. CrossRef
Rapela, J., Gramann, K., Westerfield, M., Townsend, J., & Makeig, S. (2012). Brain oscillations in switching vs. focusing audio-visual attention. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS (pp. 352–355). doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6345941.
Rejeski, W. (1985). Perceived exertion: An active or passive process? Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 371–378. CrossRef
Stegeman, D., & Hermens, H. (1999). Standards for surface electromyography: The European project Surface EMG for non-invasive assessment of muscles (SENIAM). In Proceedings of 3rd General SENIAM Workshop (pp. 108–112).
Tenenbaum, G. (2001). A social-cognitive perspective of perceived exertion and exertion tolerance. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas & C. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 810–822). New York, NY: Wiley.
Wang, L., Zheng, J., Zheng, S., & Sun, H. (2015). P300 and Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2015, e108417. doi: 10.1155/2015/108417.
Wilson, M. R., Vine, S. J., & Wood, G. (2009). The influence of anxiety on visual attentional control in basketball free throw shooting. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31, 152–168. CrossRef
- Effects of auditory distraction on voluntary movements: exploring the underlying mechanisms associated with parallel processing
Costas I. Karageorghis
Alexander V. Nowicky
Michael J. Wright
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg