Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Neuropsychological Functioning and Attachment R...

volgende artikel Depression with Mixed Features in Adolescent Ps...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

30-06-2016 | Original Article | Uitgave 3/2017 Open Access

Effective Mental Health Screening in Adolescents: Should We Collect Data from Youth, Parents or Both?

Tijdschrift:: Child Psychiatry & Human Development > Uitgave 3/2017

Auteurs:: Christine Kuhn, Marcel Aebi, Helle Jakobsen, Tobias Banaschewski, Luise Poustka, Yvonne Grimmer, Robert Goodman, Hans-Christoph Steinhausen

Extras

» Naar de volledige tekst

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10578-016-0665-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Youth- and parent-rated screening measures derived from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) were compared on their psychometric properties as predictors of caseness in adolescence (mean age 14). Successful screening was judged firstly against the likelihood of having an ICD-10 psychiatric diagnosis and secondly by the ability to discriminate between community (N = 252) and clinical (N = 86) samples (sample status). Both, SDQ and DAWBA measures adequately predicted the presence of an ICD-10 disorder as well as sample status. The hypothesis that there was an informant gradient was confirmed: youth self-reports were less discriminating than parent reports, whereas combined parent and youth reports were more discriminating—a finding replicated across a diversity of measures. When practical constraints only permit screening for caseness using either a parent or an adolescent informant, parents are the better source of information.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)

Costello EJ, Egger H, Angold A (2005) 10-year research update review: the epidemiology of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders: I. Methods and public health burden. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 44:972–986 CrossRefPubMed

De Los Reyes A, Kazdin A (2005) Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: a critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. Psychol Bull 131:183–509

De Los Reyes A, Thomas SA, Goodman KL, Kundey SMA (2013) Principles underlying the use of multiple informants’ reports. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 9:123–149 CrossRef

Piacentini JC, Cohen P, Cohen J (1992) Combining discrepant diagnostic information from multiple sources: are complex algorithms better than simple ones? J Abnorm Child Psychol 20:51–63 CrossRefPubMed

Achenbach TM, Krukowski RA, Dumenci L, Ivanova MY (2005) Assessment of adult psychopathology: meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations. Psychol Bull 131:361–382 CrossRefPubMed

Jensen PS, Rubio-Stipec M, Canino G, Bird HR, Dulcan MK, Schwab-Stone ME et al (1999) Parent and child contributions to diagnosis of mental disorder: are both informants always necessary? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 38:1569–1579 CrossRefPubMed

Ramirez Basco M, Bostic JQ, Davies D, Rush AJ, Witte B, Hendrickse W et al (2000) Methods to improve diagnostic accuracy in a community mental health setting. Am J Psychiatry 157:1599–1605 CrossRefPubMed

Jensen-Doss A, Hawley KM (2010) Understanding barriers to evidence-based assessment: clinician attitudes toward standardized assessment tools. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 39:885–896 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Goodman R (1997) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38:581–586 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Goodman R (1999) The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 40:791–799 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Goodman R, Ford T, Richards H, Gatward R, Meltzer H (2000) The Development and Well-Being Assessment: description and initial validation of an integrated assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 41:645–655 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Kraemer HC, Measelle JR, Ablow JC, Essex MJ, Boyce WT, Kupfer DJ (2003) A new approach to integrating data from multiple informants in psychiatric assessment and research: mixing and matching contexts and perspectives. Am J Psychiatry 160:1566–1577 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Jensen AL, Weisz JR (2002) Assessing match and mismatch between practitioner-generated and standardized interview-generated diagnoses for clinic-referred children and adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol 70:158–168 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Rettew DC, Lynch AD, Achenbach TM, Dumenci L, Ivanova MY (2009) Meta-analyses of agreement between diagnoses made from clinical evaluations and standardized diagnostic interviews. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 18:169–184 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Jensen-Doss A, Weisz JR (2008) Diagnostic agreement predicts treatment process and outcomes in youth mental health clinics. J Consult Clin Psychol 76:711–722 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Jensen P, Roper M, Fisher P, Piacentini J, Canino G, Richters J et al (1995) Test-retest reliability of the diagnostic interview schedule for children (DISC 2.1). Parent, child, and combined algorithms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52:61–71 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Schwab-Stone ME, Shaffer D, Dulcan MK, Jensen PS, Fisher P, Bird HR et al (1996) Criterion validity of the NIMH diagnostic interview schedule for children version 2.3 (DISC-2.3). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 35:878–888 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Becker A, Hagenberg N, Roessner V, Woerner W, Rothenberger A (2004) Evaluation of the self-reported SDQ in a clinical setting: do self-reports tell us more than ratings by adult informants? Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II17–II24 PubMed

19.

Gizer IR, Waldman ID, Abramowitz A, Barr CL, Feng Y, Wigg KG et al (2008) Relations between multi-informant assessments of ADHD symptoms, DAT1, and DRD4. J Abnorm Psychol 117:869–880 CrossRefPubMed

20.

van Dulmen MHM, Egeland B (2011) Analyzing multiple informant data on child and adolescent behavior problems: predictive validity and comparison of aggregation procedures. Int J Behav Dev 35:84–92 CrossRef

21.

Schumann G, Loth E, Banaschewski T, Barbot A, Barker G, Buchel C et al (2010) The IMAGEN study: reinforcement-related behaviour in normal brain function and psychopathology. Mol Psychiatry 15:1128–1139 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Aebi M, Kuhn C, Metzke CW, Stringaris A, Goodman R, Steinhausen HC (2012) The use of the development and well-being assessment (DAWBA) in clinical practice: a randomized trial. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 21:559–567 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Goodman A, Goodman R (2009) Strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a dimensional measure of child mental health. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 48:400–403 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Goodman A, Heiervang E, Collishaw S, Goodman R (2011) The ‘DAWBA bands’ as an ordered-categorical measure of child mental health: description and validation in British and Norwegian samples. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 46:521–532 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Goodman R, Renfrew D, Mullick M (2000) Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 9:129–134 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Viner RM, Booy R, Johnson H, Edmunds WJ, Hudson L, Bedford H et al (2012) Outcomes of invasive meningococcal serogroup B disease in children and adolescents (MOSAIC): a case-control study. Lancet Neurol 11:774–783 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Foreman D, Morton S, Ford T (2009) Exploring the clinical utility of the Development And Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) in the detection of hyperkinetic disorders and associated diagnoses in clinical practice. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50:460–470 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Hsiao JK, Bartko JJ, Potter WZ (1989) Diagnosing diagnoses. Receiver operating characteristic methods and psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46:664–667 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–843 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Donner A, Shoukri MM, Klar N, Bartfay E (2000) Testing the equality of two dependent kappa statistics. Stat Med 19:373–387 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Cantwell DP, Lewinsohn PM, Rohde P, Seeley JR (1997) Correspondence between adolescent report and parent report of psychiatric diagnostic data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:610–619 CrossRefPubMed

33.

De Los Reyes A, Augenstein TM, Wang M, Thomas SA, Drabick DA, Burgers DE et al (2015) The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychol Bull 141:858–900 CrossRef

34.

Stringaris A, Goodman R (2013) The value of measuring impact alongside symptoms in children and adolescents: a longitudinal assessment in a community sample. J Abnorm Child Psychol 41:1109–1120 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Smith SR (2007) Making sense of multiple informants in child and adolescent psychopathology: a guide for clinicians. J Psychoeduc Assess 25:139–149 CrossRef

36.

Stoyanov D, Machamer P, Schaffner KF (2013) In quest for scientific psychiatry: toward bridging the explanatory gap. Philos Psychiatr Psychol 20:261–273 CrossRef

37.

Achenbach TM, McConaughy SH, Howell CT (1987) Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychol Bull 101:213–232 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Johnson S, Hollis C, Marlow N, Simms V, Wolke D (2014) Screening for childhood mental health disorders using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: the validity of multi-informant reports. Dev Med Child Neurol 56:453–459 CrossRefPubMed

39.

De Los Reyes A, Bunnell BE, Beidel DC (2013) Informant discrepancies in adult social anxiety disorder assessments: links with contextual variations in observed behavior. J Abnorm Psychol 122:376–386 CrossRef

40.

Ford T, Last A, Henley W, Norman S, Guglani S, Kelesidi K et al (2013) Can standardized diagnostic assessment be a useful adjunct to clinical assessment in child mental health services? A randomized controlled trial of disclosure of the Development and well-being assessment to practitioners. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 48:583–593 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H (2003) Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Int Rev Psychiatry 15:166–172 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Effective Mental Health Screening in Adolescents: Should We Collect Data from Youth, Parents or Both?
Auteurs:: Christine Kuhn
Marcel Aebi
Helle Jakobsen
Tobias Banaschewski
Luise Poustka
Yvonne Grimmer
Robert Goodman
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen
Publicatiedatum: 30-06-2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-016-0665-0
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Tijdschrift: Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Uitgave 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Effective Mental Health Screening in Adolescents: Should We Collect Data from Youth, Parents or Both?

Electronic supplementary material

Abstract

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Electronic supplementary material

Abstract

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2017

Neuropsychological Functioning and Attachment Representations in Early School Age as Predictors of ADHD Symptoms in Late Adolescence

Examination of the Phenomenology and Clinical Correlates of Emetophobia in a Sample of Salvadorian Youths

Augmenting Cognitive Behavior Therapy for School Refusal with Fluoxetine: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Self-Reported Time in Bed and Sleep Quality in Association with Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms in School-Age Youth

Child Anxiety Prevention Study: Impact on Functional Outcomes

Mothers’ Early Depressive Symptoms and Preschoolers’ Behavioral Problems: The Moderating Role of Genetic Influences