Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Gepubliceerd in:

01-05-2013

Editorial Policy for Candidate Gene Studies

Auteurs: Charlotte Johnston, Benjamin B. Lahey, Walter Matthys

Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology | Uitgave 4/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Excerpt

The Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology receives an increasing number of manuscripts reporting tests of associations of candidate genetic polymorphisms with measures of psychopathology in children and adolescents, including tests of gene-environment interactions. These studies represent the exciting new directions that research in child psychopathology is taking. However, the studies also represent a challenge with regard to the criteria used for evaluating them. Across several fields, standards for the publication of such studies are currently in flux. Therefore, it seemed appropriate to advance an editorial policy for the Journal in order to guide both authors and reviewers as we evaluate and incorporate candidate gene work into the study of child psychopathology. …
volgende artikel From Parent to Child to Parent…: Paths In and Out of Problem Behavior
Literatuur
Caspi, A., Langley, K., Milne, B., Moffitt, T. E., O'Donovan, M., Owen, M. J., et al. (2008). A replicated molecular genetic basis for subtyping antisocial behavior in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 203–210.PubMedCrossRef
Duncan, L. E., & Keller, M. C. (2011). A critical review of the first 10 years of candidate gene-by-environment interaction research in psychiatry. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 1041–1049.PubMedCrossRef
Eaves, L. (2006). Genotype × environment interaction in psychopathology: fact or artifact? Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 1–8.
Eaves, L., Silberg, J. L., & Erkanli, A. (2003). Resolving multiple epigenetic pathways to adolescent depression. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 1006–1014.PubMedCrossRef
Gizer, I. R., Ficks, C., & Waldman, I. D. (2009). Candidate gene studies of ADHD: a meta-analytic review. Human Genetics, 126, 51–90.PubMedCrossRef
Greene, C. S., Penrod, N. M., Williams, S. M., & Moore, J. H. (2009). Failure to replicate a genetic association may provide important clues about genetic architecture. Plos One, 4(6).
Hewitt, J. K. (2012). Editorial policy on candidate gene association and candidate gene-by-environment interaction studies of complex traits. Behavior Genetics, 42, 1–2.PubMedCrossRef
Hoffmann, T. J., Zhan, Y. P., Kvale, M. N., Hesselson, S. E., Gollub, J., Iribarren, C., et al. (2011). Design and coverage of high throughput genotyping arrays optimized for individuals of East Asian, African American, and Latino race/ethnicity using imputation and a novel hybrid SNP selection algorithm. Genomics, 98, 422–430.PubMedCrossRef
Hunter, D. J. (2005). Gene—environment interactions in human diseases. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 287–298.PubMedCrossRef
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005b). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124.PubMedCrossRef
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005c). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, 696–701.
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2012). Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 645–654.CrossRef
Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Khoury, M. J. (2011). Improving validation practices in “omics” research. Science, 334, 1230–1232.PubMedCrossRef
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Ntzani, E. E., Trikalinos, T. A., & Contopoulos-Ioannidis, D. G. (2001). Replication validity of genetic association studies. Nature Genetics, 29, 306–309.PubMedCrossRef
Kraemer, H. C. (2010). Epidemiological methods: about time. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7, 29–45.PubMedCrossRef
Little, J., Higgins, J. P. T., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Moher, D., Gagnon, F., von Elm, E., et al. (2009). Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE Statement. Human Genetics, 125, 131–151.PubMedCrossRef
McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statisical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.PubMedCrossRef
Mill, J., & Petronis, A. (2007). Molecular studies of major depressive disorder: the epigenetic perspective. Molecular Psychiatry, 12, 799–814.PubMedCrossRef
Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Rutter, M. (2005). Strategy for investigating interactions between measured genes and measured environments. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 473–481.PubMedCrossRef
Munafo, M. R. (2009). Reliability and replicability of genetic association studies. Addiction, 104, 1439–1440.PubMedCrossRef
Rathouz, P. J., Van Hulle, C. A., Rodgers, J. L., Waldman, I., & Lahey, B. B. (2008). Specification, testing, and interpretation of gene-by-measured-environment interaction models in the presence of gene-environment correlation. Behavior Genetics, 38, 301–315.PubMedCrossRef
Rosenberg, N. A., Huang, L., Jewett, E. M., Szpiech, Z. A., Jankovic, I., & Boehnke, M. (2010). Genome-wide association studies in diverse populations. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11, 356–366.PubMedCrossRef
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.PubMedCrossRef
Sullivan, P. F. (2007). Spurious genetic associations. Biological Psychiatry, 15, 1121–1126.CrossRef
Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Belsky, J., Beach, S., Brody, G., Dodge, K. A., et al. (2011). Gene-by-environment experiments: a new approach to finding the missing heritability. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12, 881–882.PubMedCrossRef
Xiao, R., & Boehnke, M. (2009). Quantifying and correcting for the winner’s curse in genetic association studies. Genetic Epidemiology, 33, 453–462.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Editorial Policy for Candidate Gene Studies
Auteurs
Charlotte Johnston
Benjamin B. Lahey
Walter Matthys
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology / Uitgave 4/2013
Print ISSN: 2730-7166
Elektronisch ISSN: 2730-7174
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9741-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2013

Xenophobia and Tolerance Toward Immigrants in Adolescence: Cross-Influence Processes Within Friendships

Examining the Validity of ADHD as a Diagnosis for Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities: Clinical Presentation

Maternal Mind-Mindedness and Children’s Behavioral Difficulties: Mitigating the Impact of Low Socioeconomic Status

Prospective Associations of Internalizing and Externalizing Problems and Their Co-Occurrence with Early Adolescent Substance Use

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): the Factor Structure and Scale Validation in U.S. Adolescents

Maternal Psychopathology and Early Child Temperament Predict Young Children’s Salivary Cortisol 3 Years Later