Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The transition to middle school is considered to be a heightened period for involvement in bullying because the lack of a defined dominance hierarchy is thought to promote jockeying for social positions among students. Accordingly, this study examined bullying in peer ecologies at the beginning of the middle grade years in rural schools that did and did not have a transition to middle school. Thirty-six schools (20 with transitions, 16 without transitions) participated in this research with a sample of 1,800 participants (52% female) who were in sixth grade during the second year of data collection. Overall, 67% were White, 19% African American, 7% Latino, 2% Native American, and 5% other (multi-racial, Asian, unknown). Compared to schools without a transition, schools with a transition had fewer bullies following the move from fifth to sixth grade and the social dynamics in schools with a transition appeared to be less supportive of bullying. Further, students in schools with a transition reported being bullied less frequently in sixth grade and they perceived the sixth grade peer ecology as being more protective against bullying than did students in schools without a transition. In addition, proportionally more youth had controversial sociometric status in schools without a transition during sixth grade than in schools with a transition. Collectively, these findings suggest that risk for involvement in bullying may be elevated in schools that do not have a transition to middle school. They also bring into question the conventional view of the small K-8 or K-12 rural school as a peaceful and supportive peer community.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Bard, J., Gardener, C., & Wieland, R. (2006). National rural education association report: Rural school consolidation: History, research summary, conclusions, and recommendations. The Rural Educator, 27(2), 40–48.
Bloom, L. A., & Habel, J. (1998). Cliques, clans, community, and competence: The experiences of students with behavioral disorders in rural school systems. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 14, 95–106.
de Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 607–627. CrossRef
de Bruyn, E. H., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Wissink, I. B. (2010). Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 543–566. CrossRef
Eder, D., & Kinney, D. A. (1995). The effect of middle school extracurricular activities on adolescents’ popularity and peer status. Youth & Society, 26, 298–324. CrossRef
Evans, C., & Eder, D. (1993). “No exit”: Processes of social isolation in the middle school. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 139–170. CrossRef
Farmer, T. W., Farmer, E. M. Z., Estell, D., & Hutchins, B. C. (2007). The developmental dynamics of aggression and the prevention of school violence. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 197–208. CrossRef
Farmer, T. W., Hamm, J. V., Petrin, R. A., Robertson, D., Murray, R. A., Meece, J. L., et al. (2010a). Supporting early adolescent learning and social strengths: Promoting productive contexts for students at-risk for EBD during the transition to middle school. Exceptionality, 18, 94–106. doi: 10.1080/09362831003673192. CrossRef
Farmer, T. W., Irvin, M. J., Leung, M.-C., Hall, C. M., Hutchins, B. C., & McDonough, E. (2010b). Social preference, social prominence, and group membership in late elementary school: Homophilic concentration and peer affiliation configurations. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 271–293. CrossRef
Farmer, T. W., Irvin, M. J., Sgammato, A., Dadisman, K., & Thompson, J. H. (2009). Interpersonal competence configurations in rural Appalachian fifth graders: Academic achievement and associated adjustment factors. Elementary School Journal, 109, 301–321. CrossRef
Franklin, B. J., & Glascock, C. H. (1998). The relationship between grade configuration and student performance in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 14, 149–153.
Gulemetova, M., Drury, D., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2011). Findings from the National Education Association’s nationwide study of bullying. The White House conference on bullying. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.stopbullying.gov.
Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., Robertson, D., Dadisman, K., Murray, A. R., Meece, J., et al. (2010). Effects of a developmentally-based intervention with teachers on Native American and White early adolescents’ schooling adjustment in rural settings. Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 343–377. doi: 10.1080/00220970903548038. CrossRef
Herzog, M. J. R., & Pittman, R. B. (1995). Home, family, and community: Ingredients in the rural education equation. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 113–118.
Iserhagen, J., & Harris, S. (2004). A comparison of bullying in four rural middle and high schools. Rural Educator, 25, 5–12.
Juvonen, J., & Ho, A. Y. (2008). Social motives underlying antisocial behavior across middle school grades. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 747–756. CrossRef
Klein, J., & Cornell, D. (2010). Is the link between large high schools and student victimization an illusion? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 933–946. CrossRef
Kulig, J. C., Hall, B. L., & Kalischuk, R. G. (2008). Bullying perspectives among rural youth: A mixed methods approach. Rural and Remote Health, 8, 923. PubMed
Ma, X. (2001). Bullying and being bullied: To what extent are bullies also victims? American Educational Research Journal, 38, 351–370. CrossRef
Merten, D. E. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70, 175–191. CrossRef
Merten, D. E. (2005). Transitions and “trouble”: Rites of passage for suburban girls. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36, 132–148. CrossRef
Nansel, T. R., Haynie, D. L., & Simons-Morton, B. G. (2003). The association of bullying and victimization with middle school adjustment. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 45–61. CrossRef
Newman, K. S. (2004). Rampage: The social roots of school shootings. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Oliver, R., Hoover, J. H., & Hazler, R. (1994). The perceived role of bullying in small town Midwestern schools. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72, 416–420.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2000). A longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 699–725.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–280. CrossRef
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: SAGE Publications.
Song, S. Y. (2005). Protective peer ecology scale—Middle school. Yale Child Study Center: Unpublished measure.
Stewart, E. A. (2003). School social bonds, school climate, and school misbehavior: A multilevel analysis. Justice Quarterly, 20, 575–604. CrossRef
Strange, M., & Malhoit, G. (2005). Bigger isn’t always better: Why we should preserve small rural schools. Leadership Insider, October, 2–4.
Theobald, P., & Nachtigal, P. (1995). Culture, community, and the promise of rural education. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 132–136.
Thomlison, R. J., Thomlison, B., Sowers, K. M., Theriot, M. T., & Dulmus, C. N. (2004). School personnel’s observations of bullying and victimization among rural elementary and middle school children. In C. N. Dumlus & K. M. Sowers (Eds.), Kids and violence: The invisible school experience (pp. 25–43). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396–408. CrossRef
Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 157–176. CrossRef
- Early Adolescent Peer Ecologies in Rural Communities: Bullying in Schools That Do and Do not Have a Transition During the Middle Grades
Thomas W. Farmer
Jill V. Hamm
- Springer US