Top

Gepubliceerd in:

29-08-2019

Dyadic coping mediates the effects of attachment on quality of life among couples facing ovarian cancer

Auteurs: Cassandra J. Crangle, Lindsey A. Torbit, Sarah E. Ferguson, Tae L. Hart

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 4/2020

Abstract

Cancer is an interpersonal stressor affecting both patient and spouse. To examine the pathways that insecure adult attachment can impact health outcomes by way of dyadic processes, this cross-sectional study used the actor–partner interdependence mediation model to examine whether common dyadic coping (CDC) mediated the associations between attachment and quality of life (QOL). Couples (N = 106) facing ovarian cancer were recruited from a comprehensive cancer center and completed self-report questionnaires. Results indicated that worse social and functional QOL were associated with both one’s own and one’s partner’s greater insecure attachment, by way of one’s own use of less CDC. Unexpectedly, greater CDC reported by one’s partner was associated with one’s own lower functional QOL. Although CDC has beneficial effects on QOL, CDC may also be experienced as draining. Effects of adult attachment on dyadic coping are a significant contributor to subjective health outcomes among couples facing ovarian cancer.

vorige artikel Exploring the interconnectedness of fatigue, depression, anxiety and potential risk and protective factors in cancer patients: a network approach

volgende artikel The role of neuropsychological mechanisms in implementation intentions to reduce alcohol consumption among heavy drinkers: a randomized trial

Figures 2, 3 and 4 contain only standardized estimates for individual effects between predictor, mediator, and outcome variables. The numbers reflected in text refer to total direct and indirect effects, which are not contained in the figures.

Badr, H., & Acitelli, L. K. (2017). Re-thinking dyadic coping in the context of chronic illness. Current Opinion in Psychology,13, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.001 CrossRefPubMed

Badr, H., Carmack, C. L., Kashy, D. A., Cristofanili, M., & Revenson, T. A. (2010). Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychology,29, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018165 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Banthia, R., Malcarne, V. L., Varni, J. W., Ko, C. M., Sadler, G. R., & Greenbergs, H. L. (2003). The effects of dyadic strength and coping styles on psychological distress in couples faced with prostate cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine,26, 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021743005541 CrossRefPubMed

Basen-Engquist, K., Bodurka-Bevers, D., Fitzgerald, M. A., Webster, K., Cella, D., Hu, S., et al. (2001). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian. Journal of Clinical Oncology,19, 1809–1817. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1809 CrossRefPubMed

Berg, C. A., & Upchurch, R. (2007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychological Bulletin,133, 920–954. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.920 CrossRefPubMed

Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping: A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Europeenee de Psychologie Appliquee,47, 137–141.

Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T. A. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., & Kayser, K. (2011). Two conceptualizations of dyadic coping and their potential for predicting relationship quality and individual well-being: A comparison. European Psychologist,16, 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000068 CrossRef

Bodenmann, G., & Shantinath, S. D. (2004). The Couples Coping Enhancement Training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress based upon stress and coping. Family Relations,53, 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-6664.2004.00056.x CrossRef

Brucker, P. S., Yost, K., Cashy, J., Webster, K., & Cella, D. (2005). General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Evaluation and the Health Professions,28, 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278705275341 CrossRefPubMed

Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Ciechanowski, P. S., Walker, E. A., Katon, W. J., & Russo, J. E. (2002). Attachment theory: A model for health care utilization and somatization. Psychosomatic Medicine,64, 660–667. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PSY.0000021948.90613.76 CrossRefPubMed

Crowley, R., & Casarett, D. (2003). Patients’ willingness to participate in symptom-related and disease-modifying research. Cancer,97, 2327–2333. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11329 CrossRefPubMed

Dagan, M., & Hagedoorn, M. (2013). Response rates in studies of couples coping with cancer: A systematic review. Health Psychology,33, 845–852. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000013 CrossRefPubMed

Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association,56, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090 CrossRef

Ernst, J., Hinz, A., Niederwieser, D., Dohner, H., Honig, K., Vogelhuber, M., et al. (2017). Dyadic coping of patients with hematologic malignancies and their partners and its relation to quality of life—A longitudinal study. Leukemia & Lymphoma,58, 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2016.1194983 CrossRef

Feldman, B. N., & Broussard, C. A. (2006). Men’s adjustment to their partners’ breast cancer: A dyadic coping perspective. Health and Social Work,31, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/31.2.117 CrossRefPubMed

Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,78, 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.350 CrossRefPubMed

Fuenfhausen, K. K., & Cashwell, C. S. (2013). Attachment, stress, dyadic coping, and marital satisfaction of counseling graduate students. Family Journal,21, 364.CrossRef

Hagedoorn, M., Sanderman, R., Bolks, H. N., Tuinstra, J., & Coyne, J. C. (2008). Distress in couples coping with cancer: A meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychological Bulletin,134, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.1 CrossRefPubMed

Hsieh, C.-C., Chen, C.-A., Hsiao, F.-H., & Shun, S.-C. (2014). The correlations of sexual activity, sleep problems, emotional distress, attachment styles with quality of life: Comparison between gynaecological cancer survivors and noncancer women. Journal of Clinical Nursing,23, 985–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12232 CrossRefPubMed

Johnson, M. D., Anderson, J. R., Walker, A., Wilcox, A., Lewis, V. L., & Robbins, D. C. (2013). Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy. Journal of Family Psychology,27, 722–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kayser, K., Watson, L. E., & Andrade, J. T. (2007). Cancer as a “we-disease”: Examining the process of coping from a relational perspective. Families, Systems, & Health,25, 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/1091-7527.25.4.404 CrossRef

Kenny, D. A. (2015). An interactive tool for the estimation and testing mediation in the actor–partner interdependence model using structural equation modeling. (Online analysis program). Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/DyadR/DyadRweb.htm#APIMeM

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Kershaw, T., Northouse, L., Kritpracha, C., Schafenacker, A., & Mood, D. (2004). Coping strategies and quality of life in women with advanced breast cancer and their family caregivers. Psychology and Health, 19, 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440310001652687.CrossRef

Kim, J., Han, J. Y., Shaw, B., McTavish, F., & Gustafson, D. (2010). The roles of social support and coping strategies in predicting breast cancer patients’ emotional well-being: Testing mediation and moderation models. Journal of Health Psychology,15, 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309355338 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Gagliardi, S., Charvoz, L., Verardi, S., Rossier, J., et al. (2010). Psychometrics of the Dyadic Coping Inventory in three language groups. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie,69, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000024 CrossRef

Levy, K. N., Kivity, Y., Johnson, B. N., & Gooch, C. V. (2018). Adult attachment as a predictor and moderator of psychotherapy outcome: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology,74, 1996–2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22685 CrossRefPubMed

Lockwood-Rayermann, S. (2006). Survivorship issues in ovarian cancer: A review. Oncology Nursing Forum,33, 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1188/06.ONF.553-562 CrossRefPubMed

Naaman, S., Radwan, K., & Johnson, S. (2009). Coping with early breast cancer: Couple adjustment processes and couple-based intervention. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes,72, 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2009.72.4.321 CrossRef

Nissen, K. G. (2016). Correlates of self-rated attachment in patients with cancer and their caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology,25, 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4057 CrossRefPubMed

Pietromonaco, P. R., Uchino, B., & Dunkel Schetter, C. (2013). Close relationship processes and health: Implications of attachment theory for health and disease. Health Psychology,32, 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029349 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Porter, L. S., Keefe, F. J., Davis, D., Rumble, M., Scipio, C., & Garst, J. (2012). Attachment styles in patients with lung cancer and their spouses: Associations with patient and spouse adjustment. Supportive Care in Cancer,20, 2459–2466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1367-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Regan, T. W., Lambert, S. D., Kelly, B., McElduff, P., Girgis, A., Kayser, K., et al. (2014). Cross-sectional relationships between dyadic coping and anxiety, depression, and relationship satisfaction for patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. Patient Education and Counseling,96, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.04.010 CrossRefPubMed

Roland, K. B., Rodriguez, J. L., Patterson, J. R., & Trivers, K. F. (2013). A literature review of the social and psychological needs of ovarian cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology,22, 2408–2418. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3322 CrossRefPubMed

Romero, I., & Bast, R. (2012). Minireview: Human ovarian cancer: Biology, current management, and paths to personalizing therapy. Endocrinology,153, 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2011-2123 CrossRef

Rottmann, N., Hansen, D. G., Larsen, P. V., Nicolaisen, A., Flyger, H., Johansen, C., et al. (2015). Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: A longitudinal, population-based study. Health Psychology,34, 486–495. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000218 CrossRefPubMed

Schmidt, S., Nachtigall, C., Wuethrich-Martone, O., & Strauss, B. (2002). Attachment and coping with chronic disease. Journal of Psychosomatic Research,53, 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00335-5 CrossRefPubMed

Shields, C. G., Travis, L. A., & Rousseau, S. L. (2000). Marital attachment and adjustment in older couples coping with cancer. Aging & Mental Health,43, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/713649921 CrossRef

Sibley, C. G., Fischer, R., & Liu, J. H. (2005). Reliability and validity of the revised experiences in close relationships (ECR-R) self-report measure of adult romantic attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,31, 1524–1536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276865 CrossRefPubMed

Taylor, P., Rietzschel, J., Danquah, A., & Berry, K. (2015). Changes in attachment representations during psychological therapy. Psychotherapy Research,25, 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2014.886791 CrossRefPubMed

Vaske, I., Thöne, M. F., Kühl, K., Keil, D. C., Schürmann, W., Rief, W., et al. (2015). For better or for worse: A longitudinal study on dyadic coping and quality of life among couples with a partner suffering from COPD. Journal of Behavioral Medicine,38, 851–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9657-y CrossRefPubMed

von Gruenigen, V. E., Huang, H. Q., Gil, K. M., Gibbons, H. E., Monk, B. J., Rose, P. G., et al. (2010). A comparison of quality-of-life domains and clinical factors in ovarian cancer patients: A gynecologic oncology group study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management,39, 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.09.022 CrossRef

Weisflog, G., Honig, K., Gundel, H., Lang, D., Niederwieser, D., Dohner, H., et al. (2017). Associations between dyadic coping and supportive care needs: Findings from a study with hematologic cancer patients and their partners. Supportive Care in Cancer,25, 1445–1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3541-3 CrossRef

Yawn, B. P., Barrette, B. A., & Wollan, P. C. (2004). Ovarian cancer: The neglected diagnosis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings,79, 1277–1282. https://doi.org/10.4065/79.10.1277 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Dyadic coping mediates the effects of attachment on quality of life among couples facing ovarian cancer
Auteurs: Cassandra J. Crangle
Lindsey A. Torbit
Sarah E. Ferguson
Tae L. Hart
Publicatiedatum: 29-08-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-019-00096-3

Brief Report

Understanding the physical activity needs and interests of inactive and active rural women: a cross-sectional study of barriers, opportunities, and intervention preferences

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Dyadic coping mediates the effects of attachment on quality of life among couples facing ovarian cancer

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2020

Implicit theories of smoking and association with interest in quitting among current smokers

Defining picky eating and its relationship to feeding behaviors and weight status

Revising the bariatric psychological evaluation to improve clinical and research utility

Understanding the physical activity needs and interests of inactive and active rural women: a cross-sectional study of barriers, opportunities, and intervention preferences

Efficacy of habit-based weight loss interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Relationship between self-care adherence, time perspective, readiness to change and executive function in patients with heart failure

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Implicit theories of smoking and association with interest in quitting among current smokers

Defining picky eating and its relationship to feeding behaviors and weight status

Revising the bariatric psychological evaluation to improve clinical and research utility

Understanding the physical activity needs and interests of inactive and active rural women: a cross-sectional study of barriers, opportunities, and intervention preferences

Efficacy of habit-based weight loss interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Relationship between self-care adherence, time perspective, readiness to change and executive function in patients with heart failure