Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 6/2014

01-08-2014

Dutch–Flemish translation of 17 item banks from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

Auteurs: C. B. Terwee, L. D. Roorda, H. C. W. de Vet, J. Dekker, R. Westhovens, J. van Leeuwen, D. Cella, H. Correia, B. Arnold, B. Perez, M. Boers

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Background

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) is a new, state-of-the-art assessment system for measuring patient-reported health and well-being of adults and children that has the potential to be more valid, reliable and responsive than existing PROMs. The PROMIS items can be administered in short forms or, more efficiently, through computerized adaptive testing. This paper describes the translation of 563 items from 17 PROMIS item banks (domains) for adults from the English source into Dutch–Flemish.

Methods

The translation was performed by FACITtrans using standardized methodology and approved by the PROMIS Statistical Center. The translation included four forward translations, two back-translations, three to five independent reviews (at least two Dutch, one Flemish) and pre-testing in 70 adults (age range 20–77) from the Netherlands and Flanders.

Results

A small number of items required separate translations for Dutch and Flemish: physical function (five items), pain behaviour (two items), pain interference (one item), social isolation (one item) and global health (one item). Challenges faced in the translation process included: scarcity or overabundance of possible translations, unclear item descriptions, constructs broader/smaller in the target language, difficulties in rank ordering items, differences in unit of measurement, irrelevant items or differences in performance of activities. By addressing these challenges, acceptable translations were obtained for all items.

Conclusion

The methodology used and experience gained in this study can be used as an example for researchers in other countries interested in translating PROMIS. The Dutch–Flemish PROMIS items are linguistically equivalent. Short forms will soon be available for use and entire item banks are ready for cross-cultural validation in the Netherlands and Flanders.
vorige artikel Anchoring vignettes for health comparisons: an analysis of response consistency
volgende artikel An investigation into the construct validity of the Carer Experience Scale (CES)
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21, 1305–1314.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Hospital Episode Statistics. The Health and Social Care Information Centre (Ed.). (2012). Finalised Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in England: April 2010 to March 2011.
3.
Rolfson, O., Karrholm, J., Dahlberg, L. E., & Garellick, G. (2011). Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish hip arthroplasty register: Results of a nationwide prospective observational study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British, 93, 867–875.CrossRef
4.
Alviar, M. J., Olver, J., Brand, C., Tropea, J., Hale, T., Pirpiris, M., et al. (2011). Do patient-reported outcome measures in hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation have robust measurement attributes? A systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43, 572–583.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Haywood, K. L., Staniszewska, S., & Chapman, S. (2012). Quality and acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures used in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME): A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 21, 35–52.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Nelson, C. J., Cho, C., Berk, A. R., Holland, J., & Roth, A. J. (2010). Are gold standard depression measures appropriate for use in geriatric cancer patients? A systematic evaluation of self-report depression instruments used with geriatric, cancer, and geriatric cancer samples. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28, 348–356.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
Schellingerhout, J. M., Verhagen, A. P., Heymans, M. W., Koes, B. W., de Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2011). Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 21, 659–670.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
Sikkes, S. A., de Lange-de Klerk, E. S., Pijnenburg, Y. A., Scheltens, P., & Uitdehaag, B. M. (2009). A systematic review of instrumental activities of daily living scales in dementia: Room for improvement. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 80, 7–12.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Vandenbroeck, S., De, G. S., Zeyen, T., Stalmans, I., & Dobbels, F. (2011). Patient-reported outcomes (PRO’s) in glaucoma: A systematic review. Eye (Lond), 25, 555–577.CrossRef
10.
Eyssen, I. C., Steultjens, M. P., Dekker, J., & Terwee, C. B. (2011). A systematic review of instruments assessing participation: Challenges in defining participation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 983–997.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first 2 years. Medical Care, 45, S3–S11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 1179–1194.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
Fries, J., Rose, M., & Krishnan, E. (2011). The PROMIS of better outcome assessment: Responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and internet administration. Journal of Rheumatology, 38, 1759–1764.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Magasi, S., Ryan, G., Revicki, D., Lenderking, W., Hays, R. D., Brod, M., et al. (2012). Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: Perspectives from a PROMIS meeting. Quality of Life Research, 21, 739–746.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Fries, J. F., Krishnan, E., Rose, M., Lingala, B., & Bruce, B. (2011). Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory. Arthritis Research and Therapy, 13, R147.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Riley, W. T., Rothrock, N., Bruce, B., Christodolou, C., Cook, K., Hahn, E. A., et al. (2010). Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: Further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banks. Quality of Life Research, 19, 1311–1321.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22–S31.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Khanna, D., Krishnan, E., Dewitt, E. M., Khanna, P. P., Spiegel, B., & Hays, R. D. (2011). The future of measuring patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Arthritis Care and Research (Hoboken), 63(Suppl 11), S486–S490.CrossRef
19.
Riley, W. T., Pilkonis, P., & Cella, D. (2011). Application of the national institutes of health Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to mental health research. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 14, 201–208.PubMedCentralPubMed
20.
Eisenstein, E. L., Diener, L. W., Nahm, M., & Weinfurt, K. P. (2011). Impact of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Management Information System (PROMIS) upon the design and operation of multi-center clinical trials: A qualitative research study. Journal of Medical Systems, 35, 1521–1530.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
Cella, D. Center on Outcomes, R. a. E. (Ed.). (1997). Manual of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT) measurement system (Version 4). Evanston.
22.
Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B. J. (2005). A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 212–232.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Bonomi, A. E., Cella, D. F., Hahn, E. A., Bjordal, K., Sperner-Unterweger, B., Gangeri, L., et al. (1996). Multilingual translation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Quality of Life Research, 5, 309–320.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Flaherty, J. A., Gaviria, F. M., Pathak, D., Mitchell, T., Wintrob, R., Richman, J. A., et al. (1988). Developing instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 257–263.PubMed
25.
Oude Voshaar, M. A., Ten Klooster, P. M., Taal, E., Krishnan, E., & van de Laar, M. A. (2012). Dutch translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PROMIS(R) physical function item bank and cognitive pre-test in Dutch arthritis patients. Arthritis Research and Therapy, 14, R47.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
van den Berg, R., & te Lintelo, H. (1975). Analyse van individualiseringsvormen. Den Bosch: K.P.C. Groep.
27.
US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), & Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). (2009). Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims.
28.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, 3186–3191.CrossRef
29.
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–1432.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health, 8, 94–104.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Raad voor de Nederlandse Taal en Letteren. (2003). Variatie in het Nederlands: eenheid in verscheidenheid.
32.
Vandekerckhove, R. (2013). Belgian Dutch versus Netherlandic Dutch: New patterns of divergence? On pronouns of address and diminutives. Multilingua, 24, 379–397.
33.
Bruce, B., Fries, J. F., Ambrosini, D., Lingala, B., Gandek, B., Rose, M., et al. (2009). Better assessment of physical function: Item improvement is neglected but essential. Arthritis Research and Therapy, 11, R191.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
34.
Fries, J. F., Cella, D., Rose, M., Krishnan, E., & Bruce, B. (2009). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 36, 2061–2066.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Choi, S., Junghaenel, D. U., Christodoulou, C., Gershon, R., et al. (2011). How item banks and their application can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: A PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, S20–S27.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
36.
Boers, M. (2010). Standing on the promises: First wave validation reports of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 1167–1168.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Dutch–Flemish translation of 17 item banks from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Auteurs
C. B. Terwee
L. D. Roorda
H. C. W. de Vet
J. Dekker
R. Westhovens
J. van Leeuwen
D. Cella
H. Correia
B. Arnold
B. Perez
M. Boers
Publicatiedatum
01-08-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0611-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2014

Quality of Life Research 6/2014 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

An evaluation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire using Rasch analysis

OriginalPaper

An investigation into the construct validity of the Carer Experience Scale (CES)

OriginalPaper

Concept Analysis of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)

OriginalPaper

The impact of concurrent granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor on quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: results of the randomized, placebo-controlled Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9901 trial

Erratum

Erratum to: Development and validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy treatment satisfaction (FACIT TS) measures

Brief Communication

The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity