Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

27-11-2019 | Original Article

Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect

Auteurs: Otmar Bock, Konstantin Wechsler, Iring Koch, Torsten Schubert

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Presentation of a task T1 typically delays the response to a subsequent task T2, more so with high temporal task overlap than with low temporal overlap. This so-called “psychological refractory period effect” (PRP effect) has been observed even if T1 required not a choice between distinct stimulus–response pairs, but rather between a given stimulus–response pair occurring once or twice. We explored which response strategy participants use for responding to such an unusual type of T1 and how such a T1 interacts with T2 performance. In a driving simulator, participants followed a lead car and had to honk when that car’s rear window changed color (T1). In condition “pure”, the color always changed once and required a single honk; in condition “mixed”, the color changed once and required a single honk on some trials, but on other trials, it changed twice 200 ms apart and required a double honk. Participants also had to brake when the lead car braked (T2). On dual-task trials, T1 preceded T2 with a varying stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of 50–1200 ms. Reaction time to the first T1 stimulus was similar in “pure” and “mixed” and it was comparable with the reaction time to the second T1 stimulus. Reaction time to the T2 stimulus increased as SOA decreased from 350 to 50 ms, confirming the existence of a PRP effect. Furthermore, reaction time to the T2 stimulus was similar in “pure” and in “mixed” with one T1 stimulus, but was higher in “mixed” with two T1 stimuli. This pattern of findings is compatible with the view that presentation of the first T1 stimulus triggers a single response, which is amended into a double response, if a second T1 stimulus is displayed. The amendment does not need to wait until central processing of the original response is completed, and it therefore begins with no delay beyond the regular reaction time. Our findings further suggest that the mere possibility of a second T1 stimulus being presented does not increase the PRP effect on T2, probably because response amendments are not equivalent to classical response choices. However, the actual presentation of a second T1 stimulus indeed does increase the PRP effect on T2, probably because amendments start 200 ms later than the original response, and therefore prolong central processing of T1.
Literatuur
go back to reference Barrett, N. C., & Glencross, D. J. (1988). The double step analysis of rapid manual aiming movements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a, 40(2), 299–322.CrossRef Barrett, N. C., & Glencross, D. J. (1988). The double step analysis of rapid manual aiming movements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a, 40(2), 299–322.CrossRef
go back to reference Bock, O., & Jüngling, S. (1999). Reprogramming of grip aperture in a double-step virtual grasping paradigm. Experimental Brain Research, 125(1), 61–66.CrossRef Bock, O., & Jüngling, S. (1999). Reprogramming of grip aperture in a double-step virtual grasping paradigm. Experimental Brain Research, 125(1), 61–66.CrossRef
go back to reference Bratzke, D., Ulrich, R., Rolke, B., Schröter, H., Jentzsch, I., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Motor limitation in dual-task processing with different effectors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(9), 1385–1399.CrossRef Bratzke, D., Ulrich, R., Rolke, B., Schröter, H., Jentzsch, I., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Motor limitation in dual-task processing with different effectors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(9), 1385–1399.CrossRef
go back to reference Donders, F. C. (1969). Over de snelheid van psychische processen. [On the speed of psychological processes]. In W. Koster (Ed. And Trans.), Attention and performance II (pp. 412–431). Amsterdam: North-Holland (Original work published 1868). Donders, F. C. (1969). Over de snelheid van psychische processen. [On the speed of psychological processes]. In W. Koster (Ed. And Trans.), Attention and performance II (pp. 412–431). Amsterdam: North-Holland (Original work published 1868).
go back to reference Flash, T., & Henis, E. (1991). Arm trajectory modifications during reaching towards visual targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(3), 220–230.CrossRef Flash, T., & Henis, E. (1991). Arm trajectory modifications during reaching towards visual targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(3), 220–230.CrossRef
go back to reference Gottsdanker, R. (1973). Psychological refractoriness and the organization of step-tracking responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 14(1), 60–70.CrossRef Gottsdanker, R. (1973). Psychological refractoriness and the organization of step-tracking responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 14(1), 60–70.CrossRef
go back to reference Hazeltine, E., Teague, D., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 527.PubMed Hazeltine, E., Teague, D., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 527.PubMed
go back to reference Heitz, R. P. (2014). The speed-accuracy tradeoff: History, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 150.CrossRef Heitz, R. P. (2014). The speed-accuracy tradeoff: History, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 150.CrossRef
go back to reference Hibberd, D. L., Jamson, S. L., and Carsten, O. M. J. (2010). Managing in-vehicle distractions: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 4–11). Hibberd, D. L., Jamson, S. L., and Carsten, O. M. J. (2010). Managing in-vehicle distractions: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 4–11).
go back to reference Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4(1), 11–26.CrossRef Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4(1), 11–26.CrossRef
go back to reference Kahnemann, D. (1973). Attention and effort. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Kahnemann, D. (1973). Attention and effort. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
go back to reference Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(2), 167–178.CrossRef Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(2), 167–178.CrossRef
go back to reference Kerr, B. (1979). Is reaction time different for long and short response durations in simple and choice conditions? Journal of Motor Behavior, 11(4), 269–274.CrossRef Kerr, B. (1979). Is reaction time different for long and short response durations in simple and choice conditions? Journal of Motor Behavior, 11(4), 269–274.CrossRef
go back to reference Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking: An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 557–583.CrossRef Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking: An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 557–583.CrossRef
go back to reference Koch, I., & Prinz, W. (2002). Process interference and code overlap in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(1), 192. Koch, I., & Prinz, W. (2002). Process interference and code overlap in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(1), 192.
go back to reference Levy, J., & Pashler, H. (2008). Task prioritisation in multitasking during driving: Opportunity to abort a concurrent task does not insulate braking responses from dual-task slowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22(4), 507–525.CrossRef Levy, J., & Pashler, H. (2008). Task prioritisation in multitasking during driving: Opportunity to abort a concurrent task does not insulate braking responses from dual-task slowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22(4), 507–525.CrossRef
go back to reference Levy, J., Pashler, H., & Boer, E. (2006). Central interference in driving is there any stopping the psychological refractory period? Psychological Science, 17(3), 228–235.CrossRef Levy, J., Pashler, H., & Boer, E. (2006). Central interference in driving is there any stopping the psychological refractory period? Psychological Science, 17(3), 228–235.CrossRef
go back to reference McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 471. McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 471.
go back to reference Megaw, E. D. (1974). Possible modification to a rapid on-going programmed manual response. Brain Research, 71(2–3), 425–441.CrossRef Megaw, E. D. (1974). Possible modification to a rapid on-going programmed manual response. Brain Research, 71(2–3), 425–441.CrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104(4), 749–791.CrossRef Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104(4), 749–791.CrossRef
go back to reference Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(3), 358–377.PubMed Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(3), 358–377.PubMed
go back to reference Pashler, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(4), 1023–1040.PubMed Pashler, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(4), 1023–1040.PubMed
go back to reference Schubert, T. (1996). Interference effects during the simultaneous processing of two tasks. Zeitschrift für experimentelle Psychologie, 4, 625–656. (German). Schubert, T. (1996). Interference effects during the simultaneous processing of two tasks. Zeitschrift für experimentelle Psychologie, 4, 625–656. (German).
go back to reference Schubert, T. (1999). Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 408–425. Schubert, T. (1999). Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 408–425.
go back to reference Schubert, T., & Strobach, T. (2018). Practice-related optimization of dual-task performance: Efficient task instantiation during overlapping task processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(12), 1884–1904.PubMed Schubert, T., & Strobach, T. (2018). Practice-related optimization of dual-task performance: Efficient task instantiation during overlapping task processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(12), 1884–1904.PubMed
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Glass, J. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., et al. (1999). Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(3), 791–814. Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Glass, J. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., et al. (1999). Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(3), 791–814.
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., et al. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12(2), 101–108.CrossRef Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., et al. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12(2), 101–108.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, M. C. (1969). The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 30, 220–231.CrossRef Smith, M. C. (1969). The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 30, 220–231.CrossRef
go back to reference Soechting, J. F., & Lacquaniti, F. (1983). Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49(2), 548–564.CrossRef Soechting, J. F., & Lacquaniti, F. (1983). Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49(2), 548–564.CrossRef
go back to reference Stelzel, C., & Schubert, T. (2011). Interference effects of stimulus–response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness. Psychological Research, 75(6), 476–490.CrossRef Stelzel, C., & Schubert, T. (2011). Interference effects of stimulus–response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness. Psychological Research, 75(6), 476–490.CrossRef
go back to reference Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.CrossRef Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.CrossRef
go back to reference Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Cleaning up your act: Screening data prior to analysis. Using Multivariate Statistics, 5, 61–116. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Cleaning up your act: Screening data prior to analysis. Using Multivariate Statistics, 5, 61–116.
go back to reference Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14(1), 1–36.CrossRef Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14(1), 1–36.CrossRef
go back to reference Ulrich, R., Fernández, S. R., Jentzsch, I., Rolke, B., Schröter, H., & Leuthold, H. (2006). Motor limitation in dual-task processing under ballistic movement conditions. Psychological Science, 17(9), 788–793.CrossRef Ulrich, R., Fernández, S. R., Jentzsch, I., Rolke, B., Schröter, H., & Leuthold, H. (2006). Motor limitation in dual-task processing under ballistic movement conditions. Psychological Science, 17(9), 788–793.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Sonderen, J. F., Denier van der Gon, J. J., & Gielen, C. C. A. M. (1988). Conditions determining early modification of motor programmes in response to changes in target location. Experimental Brain Research, 71(2), 320–328.CrossRef Van Sonderen, J. F., Denier van der Gon, J. J., & Gielen, C. C. A. M. (1988). Conditions determining early modification of motor programmes in response to changes in target location. Experimental Brain Research, 71(2), 320–328.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Sonderen, J. F., Gielen, C. C. A. M., & Denier van der Gon, J. J. (1989). Motor programmes for goal-directed movements are continuously adjusted according to changes in target location. Experimental Brain Research, 78(1), 139–146.CrossRef Van Sonderen, J. F., Gielen, C. C. A. M., & Denier van der Gon, J. J. (1989). Motor programmes for goal-directed movements are continuously adjusted according to changes in target location. Experimental Brain Research, 78(1), 139–146.CrossRef
go back to reference Welford, A. T. (1952). The ‘psychological refractory period’ and the timing of high-speed performance—a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43(1), 2–19. Welford, A. T. (1952). The ‘psychological refractory period’ and the timing of high-speed performance—a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43(1), 2–19.
go back to reference Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. VIII, pp. 239–257). Hillsdale: Erlbaum Assoc. Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. VIII, pp. 239–257). Hillsdale: Erlbaum Assoc.
Metagegevens
Titel
Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect
Auteurs
Otmar Bock
Konstantin Wechsler
Iring Koch
Torsten Schubert
Publicatiedatum
27-11-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01272-5