Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

14-06-2022 | Empirical Research

Drug Use Homophily in Adolescent Offenders’ Close Friendship Groups

Auteurs: Anna D. Drozdova, April Gile Thomas, Hannah I. Volpert-Esmond, Laurence Steinberg, Paul J. Frick, Elizabeth E. Cauffman

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 10/2022

Abstract

Adolescents who befriend drug using peers may be at risk for initiated and continued substance use. The present secondary data analysis examined how drug use homophily (i.e., similarity) in justice-involved boys’ friendship groups relates to their subsequent substance use variety across a period of five years. Participants were 1216 first-time adolescent offenders (M_{age Baseline} = 15.29; 100% male). Multilevel model analyses revealed that, among participants who entered the study with a history of substance use, drug use homophily was associated with greater subsequent substance use variety. Among participants who entered the study without a history of substance use, this association was no longer significant. The findings have implications for guiding justice system programming aimed at decreasing adolescent offenders’ substance use.

vorige artikel Too Many Males or Too Many Females? Classroom Sex Ratio, Life History Strategies and Risk-Taking Behaviors

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01. CrossRef

Beardslee, J., Datta, S., Byrd, A., Meier, M., Prins, S., Cerda, M., & Pardini, D. (2018). An examination of parental and peer influence on substance use and criminal offending during the transition from adolescence to adulthood. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(6), 783–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818764767. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Becker, S. J., Marceau, K., Hernandez, L., & Spirito, A. (2019). Is it selection or socialization? Disentangling peer influences on heavy drinking and marijuana use among adolescents whose parents received brief interventions. Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, 13, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178221819852644. CrossRef

Bahr, S. J., Hoffmann, J. P., & Yang, X. (2005). Parental and peer influences on he risk of adolescent drug use. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 529–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-0014-8. CrossRefPubMed

Blanton, H., & Burkley, M. (2008). Deviance regulation theory: Applications to adolescent social influence. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 94–121). The Guilford Press.

Boman, J. H., & Mowen, T. J. (2018). Same feathers, different flocks: Breaking down the meaning of ‘behavioral homophily’ in the etiology of crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 54, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.12.003. CrossRefPubMed

Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.

Chassin, L. (2008). Juvenile justice and substance use. Future of Children, 18(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0017. CrossRefPubMed

Chassin, L., Rogosch, F., & Barrera, M. (1991). Substance use and symptomatology among adolescent children of alcoholics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(4), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.100.4.449. CrossRefPubMed

Crosnoe, R. (2000). Friendships in childhood and adolescence: The life course and new directions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695847. CrossRef

D’Amico, E. J., & McCarthy, D. M. (2006). Escalation and initiation of younger adolescents’ substance use: The impact of perceived peer use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(4), 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.02.010. CrossRef

Eisenberg, M. E., Toumbourou, J. W., Catalano, R. F., & Hemphill, S. A. (2014). Social norms in the development of adolescent substance use: A longitudinal analysis of the International Youth Development Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1486–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0111-1. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., Hussong, A., Faris, R., Foshee, V. A., Cai, L., & DuRant, R. H. (2006). The peer context of adolescent substance use: Findings from social network analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00127.x. CrossRef

Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625. CrossRefPubMed

Haynie, D. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(2), 99–134. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015227414929. CrossRef

Hussey, D. L., Drinkard, A. M., & Flannery, D. J. (2007). Comorbid substance use and mental disorders among offending youth. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 7(1–2), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1300/J160v07n01_07. CrossRef

Kiesner, J., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2004). “Very Important Persons” in adolescence: Going beyond in-school, single friendships in the study of peer homophily. Journal of Adolescence, 27(5), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.06.007. CrossRefPubMed

Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13. CrossRef

Light, J. M., Greenan, C. C., Rusby, J. C., Nies, K. M., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2013). Onset to first alcohol use in early adolescence: A network diffusion model. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12064. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Maxwell, K. A. (2002). Friends: The role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(4), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015493316865. CrossRef

Meisel, S. N., & Colder, C. R. (2020). Adolescent social norms and alochol use: Separating between- and within-person associations to test reciprocal determinism. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30, 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12494. CrossRefPubMed

Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2010). Key findings from longitudinal studies. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(10), 633–642. CrossRef

Nash, S. G., McQueen, A., & Bray, J. H. (2005). Pathways to adolescent alcohol use: Family environment, peer influence, and parental expectations. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.06.004. CrossRef

Pearson, M., Steglich, C., & Snijders, T. (2006). Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections, 27(1), 47–63.

Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1996). Pluralistic ignorance and the perpetuation of social norms by unwitting actors. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 161–209). Academic Press.

Ragan, D. T. (2020). Similarity between deviant peers: Developmental trends in influence and selection. Criminology, 58(2), 336–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12238. CrossRef

R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for satistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org.

Richmond, A. D., Laursen, B., & Stattin, H. (2018). Homophily in delinquent behavior: The rise and fall of friend similarity across adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025418767058. CrossRef

Sampson, R., & Raudenbush, S. (1999). Systematic social observation on public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 603–651. CrossRef

Schubert, C. A., Mulvey, E. P., & Glasheen, C. (2011). Influence of mental health and substance use problems and criminogenic risk on outcomes in serious juvenile offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(9), 925–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2011.06.006. CrossRefPubMed

Simons-Morton, B., & Chen, R. S. (2006). Over time relationships between early adolescent and peer substance use. Addictive Behaviors, 31(7), 1211–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.09.006. CrossRefPubMed

Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.

Trucco, E. M., Colder, C. R., & Wieczorek, W. F. (2011). Vulnerability to peer influence: A moderated mediation study of early adolescent alcohol use initiation. Addictive Behaviors, 36(7), 729–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.02.008. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tucker, J. S., Ellickson, P. L., Collins, R. L., & Klein, D. J. (2006). Are drug experimenters better adjusted than abstainers and users?: A longitudinal study of adolescent marijuana use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(4), 488–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.03.012. CrossRef

Turanovic, J., & Young, J. (2016). Violent offending an dvictimization in adolescence: Social network mechanisms and homophily. Criminology, 54(3), 487–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12112. CrossRef

Wongtongkam, N., Ward, P. R., Day, A., & Winefield, A. H. (2014). The influence of protective and risk factors in individual, peer and school domains on Thai adolescents’ alcohol and illicit drug use: A survey. Addictive Behaviors, 39(10), 1447–1451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.05.026. CrossRefPubMed

Wu, P., Liu, X., & Fan, B. (2010). Factors associated with initiation of ecstasy use among US adolescents: Findings from a national survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 106(2–3), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.08.020. CrossRefPubMed

Young, J. T. N., Rebellon, C. J., Barnes, J. C., & Weerman, F. M. (2014). Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology, 52(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12029. CrossRef

Zapolski, T. C. B., Clifton, R. L., Banks, D. E., Hershberger, A., & Aalsma, M. (2019). Family and peer influences on substance attitudes and use among juvenile justice-involved youth. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(2), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1268-0. CrossRefPubMed

Zarrett, N., & Eccles, J. (2006). The passage to adulthood: Challenges of late adolescence. In New Directions for Youth Development (Issue 111, pp. 13–28). https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.179.

Titel: Drug Use Homophily in Adolescent Offenders’ Close Friendship Groups
Auteurs: Anna D. Drozdova
April Gile Thomas
Hannah I. Volpert-Esmond
Laurence Steinberg
Paul J. Frick
Elizabeth E. Cauffman
Publicatiedatum: 14-06-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 10/2022
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01637-x

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2022

“I Feel You!”: The Role of Empathic Competences in Reducing Ethnic Prejudice Among Adolescents

Too Many Males or Too Many Females? Classroom Sex Ratio, Life History Strategies and Risk-Taking Behaviors

Self-harm and Aggression in Chinese Early Adolescents: Their Co-occurrence and the Role of Bullying Victimization

Associations between Student-Teacher Bonds and Oppositional Behavior Against Teachers in Adolescence: A Longitudinal Analysis from Ages 11 to 15

Parent and Romantic Partner Behaviors during Adolescence as Predictors of Young Adult Positive Personality, Relational Competence, and Functional Independence

Differences in Aggression and Alcohol Use among Youth with Varying Levels of Victimization and Popularity Status