The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Boundary of Amygdala and Hippocampus

To the Editor: For the last two decades, volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have been widely used for clinical and research purposes in neuroscience. Recently, high-resolution MRI with thin-slice and advanced image-processing technologies have satisfied these needs. Because of its neurophysiologically important role, the hippocampus has been the main target of measurement in neuropsychological diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, depression, and schizophrenia.

Many researchers have developed methods of quantifying real hippocampal volume. And there has been an advance in the methodology of MRI volumetry (14). Correct anatomical separation between the amygdala and hippocampus is difficult. So deciding on an anatomical boundary between the two structures is an important issue in amygdala-hippocampus volumetric MRI studies.

Michael D. De Bellis, M.D., M.P.H., et al. wrote a report (5) related to hippocampal volume measurement, but their study appeared to make a mistake in its setting of amygdala and hippocampus boundaries. In Figure 2, the trace line included both the posterior amygdala and anterior hippocampus. If the authors wanted to separate the hippocampus from the amygdala, the region of interest in Figure 2 would be obviously wrong. As a result, the normal hippocampal volume in Table 1 became relatively large compared to those in earlier reports.

References

1. Clifford RJ, Michael DB, Colleen KT: MR-imaging-based volume measurements of the hippocampal formation and anterior temporal lobe: validation studies. Radiology 1990; 176:205–209Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2. Clifford RJ: MRI-based hippocampal volume measurements in epilepsy. Epilepsia 1994; 35(suppl 6):S21–S29Google Scholar

3. Clifford RJ, William HT, Mark C: MRI-based hippocampal volumetrics: data acquisition, normal ranges, and optimal protocol. Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 13:1057–1064Google Scholar

4. Clifford RJ, William HT, Mark C: Reliability and exactness of MRI-based volumetry: a phantom study. J MRI 1996; 6:700–704Google Scholar

5. De Bellis MD, Clark DB, Beers SR, Soloff PH, Boring AM, Hall J, Kersh A, Keshavan MS: Hippocampal volume in adolescent-onset alcohol use disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:737–744LinkGoogle Scholar