J. D. Eveland
ABSTRACT
The pattern of CSCW system users helping other using to resolve problems and make more effective use of such tools has been observed in a variety of settings, but little is known about how help patterns develop or their effects. Results from a pre-post study of the implementation of CSCW tools among university faculty, staff and administration indicate that the network of helping relationships is largely disaggregated and generally follows work group alignments rather than technical specialization. A relatively small group of “high providers” is responsible for most help to users, and tends to act as a liaison between central support staff and work group members. These providers are not systematically different from other personnel except in terms of their expertise. Implications of these findings for the development and cultivation of help relationships in support of CSCW are developed.
- 1.Bannon, L. "Helping Users Help Each Other" in Norman and Draper (Eds.), User Centered System Design, 1986.Google Scholar
- 2.Bikson, T.K. and Eveland, J.D., "The Interplay of Work Group Structures and Computer Support" in Kraut, R., Galegher, J and Egido, C. (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990, pp. 245-290. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.B ikson, T.K., Gutek, B. and Mankin, D. Implementing Computerized Procedures in Office Settings: Influences and Outcomes Santa Monica CA: The Rand Corporation, R-3077-NSF/IRIS, October 1987.Google Scholar
- 4.Borgatti, S. and Everett, M. UCINET IV Manual. 1992.Google Scholar
- 5.Brief, A. and Motowidlo, S. "Prosocial Organizational Behaviors" Academy of Management Review 11, 1986, pp. 710-725.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 6.Chakrabarti, A. "The Role of Champion in Product Innovation" California Management Review, 17(2), Winter 1974, pp. 58-62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 7.Clement, A. "Cooperative Support for Computer Work: A Social Perspective on the Empowering of End Users" Proceedings of the 1990 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles CA, September 1990, pp. 223-236. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Eisenberg, N. and Miller, P. "The Relation of Empathy to Prosocial and Related Behaviors" Psychological Bulletin, 101,1987, pp. 91-119.{Google Scholar
- 9.Englebart, D. "Toward High Performance Knowledge Workers" in Greif, I. (Ed.) Computer Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings San Mateo CA: Morgan Kaufman, 1988, pp. 67-78. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Eveland, J.D. "Uses and limitations of communication network analysis in the evaluation of CSCW applications." Presented to the Workshop on Evaluating CSCW Systems, Third European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Milan, Italy. October 1993.Google Scholar
- 11.Eveland, J.D. and and Bikson, T.K. "Work Group Structures and Computer Support: A Field Experiment" A CM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(4), October 1988, pp. 354-379. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Farace, R. and Mabee, T. "Communication Network Analysis Methods" in Multivariate Techniques in Human Communication Research 1980, pp. 366-391.Google Scholar
- 13.Freeman, L. "Centrality in Social Networks. I. Conceptual Clarification" Social Networks 1, 1979, pp. 215-2391979.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 14.Granovetter, M. "The Strength of Weak Ties" American Journal of Sociology 78, 1973, pp. 1360- 1380.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 15.Greif, I. and Sarin, S. "Data Sharing in Group Work" Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Austin TX, September 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.Johnson,B. and Rice, R., Managing Organizational innovation: The Evolution from Word Processing to Office Information Systems New York: Columbia University Press, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.Kling, R. and Scacchi, W. "The Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization" in Advances in Computers, 21, 1982, pp. 1-90.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 18.Knoke, D. and Kuklinski, J. Network Analysis Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications, 1982.Google Scholar
- 19.Kraut, R., Egido, C., and Galegher, J. "Patterns of Contact and Communication in Scientific Research Collaborations" in 1990; in Kraut, R., Galegher, J and Egido, C. (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990, pp. 149-172. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.Lee, D. "Usage Pattern and Sources of Assistance for Personal Computer Users" MIS Quarterly, December 1986, pp. 313-325. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.Mackay, W. "Patterns of Sharing Customizable Software" Proceedings of the 1990 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles CA, September 1990, pp. 223-236. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.Marsden, P. "Network data and measurement." Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 1990, pp. 435-463.Google Scholar
- 23.Mowday, R., Porter, L, and Steers, R. Employee- Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover New York: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
- 24.O'Reilly, C. and Chatman, J. "Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, identification, and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior" Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 1986, pp. 492-499.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 25.Organ, D. Organizational Citizenship Behavior Lexington MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- 26.Papa, M. "Communication Network Patterns and Employee Performance with New Technology" Communication Research, 17(3), June 1990, pp.344- 368.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 27.Rice, R. and Shook, D. "Usage of, Access to, and Outcomes from an Electronic Messaging System" ACM Transactions on information Systems, 6, 1988, pp. 255-276. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 28.Rice, R. "Computer-Mediated Communication and Organizational Innovation" Journal of Communication, 37, 1987, pp. 65-94.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 29.Rockhart, J. and Flannery, L. "The Management of End User Computing." Communications of the ACM. 26. October 1983, pp. 776-784. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 30.Rogers, E. and Kincaid, D.L. Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Pres s, 1981.Google Scholar
- 31.Stasz, C, Bikson, T.K., Eveland, J.D., and Mittman, B. Information Technology in the U.S. Forest Service Santa Monica CA: The Rand Corporation, R-3908- USDAFS, July 1990.Google Scholar
- 32.Stork, D. and Richards, W. "Nonrespondents in Communication Network Studies" Group and Organization Management. 17(2), June 1992, pp. 193- 209.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 33.Strassman, P. Information Payoff: The Transformation of Work in the Electronic Age New York: Free Press, 1985.Google Scholar
- 34.Taylor, J. Performance by Design 1993.Google Scholar
- 35.Tornatzky, L. and Fleischer, M. The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1990.Google Scholar
- 36.Zuboff, S. in the Age of the Smart Machine New York: Basic Books, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The role of “help networks” in facilitating use of CSCW tools
Recommendations
CSCW Tools: Concepts and Architectures
Building efficient frameworks for computer-supported cooperative work requires different approaches. The combination of CSCW transparency and awareness produces an advanced environment adaptable to specific applications. The authors provide a CSCW ...
Effective Use of Collaborative IT Tools: Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences
HICSS '08: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System SciencesA fundamental issue for IS academics and practitioners is how collaborative IT tools can be effectively used to improve group work. Collaborative IT tools are integrated sets of IT functionalities that facilitate communication and information sharing ...
Comments