Abstract
Abstract. Women have a minority position within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics and, consequently, are likely to face more adversities at work. This diary study takes a look at a facilitating factor for women’s research performance within academia: daily work engagement. We examined the moderating effect of gender on the relationship between two behaviors (i.e., daily networking and time control) and daily work engagement, as well as its effect on the relationship between daily work engagement and performance measures (i.e., number of publications). Results suggest that daily networking and time control cultivate men’s work engagement, but daily work engagement is beneficial for the number of publications of women. The findings highlight the importance of work engagement in facilitating the performance of women in minority positions.
References
2004). Sleepless in academia. Gender and Education, 16, 3–24. doi: 10.1080/0954025032000170309
(2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 265–269. doi: 10.1177/0963721411414534
(2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209–223. doi: 10.1108/13620430810870476
(2003). Crumbling ivory towers: Academic organizing and its gender effects. Gender, Work and Organization, 10, 194–212. doi: 10.1111/1468-0432.t01-1-00011
(2011). Gender differences and factors affecting publication productivity among Australian university academics. Journal of Sociology, 48, 85–103. doi: 10.1177/1440783311411958
(2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17, 369–386. doi: 10.1080/09540250500145072
(1991). Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 405–410. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.405
(2004). The substance of things hoped for: A study of the future orientation, minority status perceptions, academic engagement, and academic performance of black high school students. Journal of Black Psychology, 30, 248–273. doi: 10.1177/0095798403260727
(2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 3157–3162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014871108
(2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relationships with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
(2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36, 255–276. doi: 10.1108/00483480710726136
(2007). Learning the art of networking: A critical skill for enhancing social capital and career success. Journal of Management Education, 32, 629–650. doi: 10.1177/1052562907307637
(2001). Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 27, 279–286. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.615
(2010).
(From thought to action: Employee work engagement and job performance . In A. B. BakkerM. P. LeiterEds., Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 147–163). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.2011). Creating knowledge through networks: A gender perspective. Gender, Work and Organization, 18, 90–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00536.x
(2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
(2012). She figures 2012. European Commission: Research and Innovation – Science in Society. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/she-figures-2012_en.pdf
(2004). Networking behaviors and career outcomes: Differences for men and women? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 419–437. doi: 10.1002/job.253
(2006). Participation, performance, and advancement of women in academic science and engineering: What is at issue and why. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 377–386. doi: 10.1007/s10961-006-7209-x
(1996). Reactions to perceived sex discrimination. Human Relations, 49, 791–811. doi: 10.1177/001872679604900604
(2010). The internet and academics’ workload and work–family balance. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 158–163. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.004
(2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00234
(1994). More than clockwork: Women’s time management in their combined workloads. Sociological Perspectives, 37, 611–633. doi: 10.2307/1389281
(2007). Career success and weak paradigms: The role of activity, resiliency, and true scores. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 933–942. doi: 10.1002/job
(1993). Managerial level and subunit function as determinants of networking behavior in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 18, 328–351. doi: 10.1177/1059601193183005
(1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308. doi: 10.2307/2392498
(2009). Understanding tokenism: Antecedents and consequences of a psychological climate of gender inequity. Journal of Management, 36, 482–510. doi: 10.1177/0149206308328508
(2006). Work engagement among women managers and professionals in a Turkish bank: Potential antecedents and consequences. Equal Opportunities International, 25, 299–310. doi: 10.1108/02610150610706276
(1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
(2001). Networking for female managers’ career development. Empiricial evidence. Journal of Management Development, 20, 823–829. doi: 10.1177/1059601193183005
(2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1, 85–91. doi: 10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86
(2011). The antecedents of a “chilly climate” for women faculty in higher education. Human Relations, 64, 139–159. doi: 10.1177/0018726710377932
(2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 149–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.09.002
(2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 270–295. doi: 10.1108/02683940610663097
(2010). Diary studies in organizational research. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 79–93. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000009
(2007). Unfair treatment and self-regulatory focus. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 505–512. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.014
(2009). How women engineers do and undo gender: Consequences for gender equality. Gender, Work and Organization, 16, 411–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00406.x
(2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. doi: 10.3102/10769986031004437
(2009). A user’s guide to MLwiN: Version 2.10. Bristol, UK: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
(2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 116–131. doi: 10.1080/09585190701763982
(2008). Work-family culture in academia: A gendered view of work-family conflict and coping strategies. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 23, 442–457. doi: 10.1108/17542410810897553
(2008). The gender subtext of science, engineering, and technology (SET) organizations: A review and critique. Women’s Studies, 37, 284–316. doi: 10.1080/00497870801917242
(2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43, 423–446. doi: 10.1023/A:1015575616285
(2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282471
(2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmative factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326
(2013). When trying hard isn’t natural: Women’s belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 131–143. doi: 10.1177/0146167212468332
(2007). Undergraduate women in science and engineering: Effects of faculty, fields, and institutions over time. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 1333–1356. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00505.x
(2007). Exploring how constraints created by other people influence intraindividual variation in objective performance measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1149–1158. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1149
(2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. South-African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36, 1–9. doi: 10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841
(2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 230–240. doi: 10.1037/a0032141
(2011). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19, 507–524. doi: 10.1177/1350508411414293
(2006). Networking your way through the organisation: Gender differences in the relationship between network participation and career satisfaction. Women In Management Review, 21, 54–66. doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326
(2009). Effects of networking on career success: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 196–206. doi: 10.1037/a0013350
(