Do High Working Memory Groups Perform Better?
A Conceptual Approach Linking Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity to Group Performance
Abstract
A growing body of research shows that individual differences in working memory capacity play a pivotal role for a large number of higher order cognitive tasks. Surprisingly, however, the impact of individual differences in working memory capacity on group performance has received little attention. In this conceptual article, we focus on three typical group tasks (group idea generation, group decision making, group judgment) and, for each task, provide an analysis of how individual differences in working memory capacity might affect group performance. Our key idea is that group interaction is a cognitively demanding task as group members have to continuously monitor the ongoing conversation, hold their ideas in memory, integrate the information put forth by others, and update their mental representations accordingly. Therefore, individual differences in working memory capacity are presumed to have a profound impact on how people process information during group interaction.
References
2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.
(2000). Cognitive, perceptual-speed, and psychomotor determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 259–290.
(2009). Working memory, but not IQ, predicts subsequent learning in children with learning difficulties. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 92–98.
(2010). Contributions of spatial working memory to visuomotor learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1917–1930.
(1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.
(1974). Working memory. In , The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
(2007). Deep-Level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595–615.
(2010). Collaborative memory performance: Processes, performance and techniques for improvement. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 119–130.
(2005). Working memory capacity and suppression of intrusive thoughts. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 36, 61–68.
(2006). Working memory dimensions as differential predictors of the speed and error aspect of multitasking performance. Human Performance, 19, 253–275.
(1990). The game of bridge as an exercise in working memory and reasoning. Journal of Gerontology, 45, 233–238.
(2005). Working memory and general intelligence: The role of short-term storage. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1005–1014.
(2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32, 277–296.
(1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.
(1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422–433.
(2012). Working memory benefits creative insight, musical improvisation and original ideation through maintained task-focused attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 656–669.
(2010). Collaborative problem-solving with distributed information: The role of inferences from interdependent information. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 361–378.
(1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509.
(2003). Probability judgment and subadditivity: The role of working memory capacity and constraining retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 31, 968–982.
(1977). Quality of group judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 158–172.
(2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In , The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 145–199). New York, NY: Elsevier.
(2010). Beyond group-level explanations for the failure of groups to solve hidden profiles: The individual preference effect revisited. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 653–671.
(2004). When is one head better than two? Interdependent information in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 102–113.
(2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322–339.
(1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In , Advances in experimental social psychology, 8, (pp. 47–99). New York, NY: Academic Press.
(1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43–64.
(2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 174–180.
(2010). Trait and state differences in working memory capacity. In , Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (pp. 295–320). New York, NY: Springer.
(1997). The architecture of working memory. In , Cognitive neuroscience (pp. 243–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2000). Working memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 333–358.
(2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637–671.
(2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66–71.
(1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580–602.
(2011). Building on the ideas of others: An examination of the idea combination process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 554–561.
(2012). Relational integration as a predictor of academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 759–769.
(2009). Storage and non-storage components of working memory predicting reasoning: A simultaneous examination of a wide range of ability factors. Intelligence, 37, 347–364.
(2008). Reasoning and working memory as predictors of school grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 248–257.
(1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity? Intelligence, 14, 389–433.
(1996). Is working memory capacity Spearman’s g. In , Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 49–75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1990). Cognitive abilities as determinants of success in acquiring logic skill. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 129–160.
(2010). In search of synergy in small group performance. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(1945). The Research Center for Group Dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sociometry, 8, 126–136.
(1997). Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 133–47.
(1995). An input- process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 877–889.
(2012). Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 54–75.
(2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
(2006). Information sampling in group decision making: Sampling biases and their consequences. In , Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 299–325). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2010). Knowing others’ preferences degrades the quality of group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 794–808.
(2008). Social validation in group decision making: Differential effects on the decisional impact of preference-consistent and preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1477–1490.
(2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213.
(1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In , Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Plenum.
(2005). Working memory and intelligence – their correlation and their relation: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 61–65.
(2000). Working memory capacity – facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017–1045.
(2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31, 167–193.
(2008). Which working memory functions predict intelligence? Intelligence, 36, 641–652.
(1957). Applied imagination (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Scribner.
(1993). Reasoning in explanation-based decision making. Cognition, 49, 123–163.
(2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 164–171.
(2008). Group-based self-regulation: The effects of regulatory focus. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 126–164.
(2008). Working memory capacity and the self-regulation of emotional expression and experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1526–1540.
(1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.
(2007). Motivated information processing and group decision making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 539–552.
(2012). Why groups perform better than individuals at quantitative judgment tasks: Group-to-individual transfer as an alternative to differential weighting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 24–36.
(2012). Group performance and leadership. In , An introduction to social psychology (5th ed.). (pp. 415–447). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
(2012). How to achieve synergy in group decision making: Lessons to be learned from the hidden profile paradigm. European Review of Social Psychology, 23, 305–343.
(1989). Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 1–28.
(1990). Revision, weighting and commitment in consensus group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 66–84.
(1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussion. In , Group process and productivity (pp. 48–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478.
(1972). Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press.
(2002). Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability – and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261–288.
(1958). Does group participation when brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 23–47.
(2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132.
(2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286–310.
(