Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Donors’ Social Class and Their Prosocial Reputation

Perceived Authentic Motivation as an Underlying Mechanism

Published Online:August 10, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000342

Abstract

Abstract. Donors’ social class may provide cues for others to judge their underlying motives and prosociality. We test whether donors’ social class affects their prosocial reputation through perceived authentic motivation. Across four studies, we find that low-class donors are perceived as more authentically motivated to care about others’ welfare, and thus gain more prosocial reputation as a benevolent person, compared to high-class donors. Moreover, prosocial impact salience moderates this effect: When donation is equal in the percentage of donors’ annual income, making the prosocial impact of donors’ contribution salient enhances high-class donors’ perceived authentic motivation and prosocial reputation to the same levels as those of low-class donors. These findings provide important insights into how to design efficient fundraising events or platforms.

References

  • Ames, D. R., Flynn, F. J. & Weber, E. U. (2004). It’s the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261890 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ariely, D., Bracha, A. & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99, 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.1.544 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barasch, A., Berman, J. Z. & Small, D. A. (2016). When payment undermines the pitch: On the persuasiveness of pure motives in fund-raising. Psychological Science, 27, 1388–1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616638841 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barasch, A., Levine, E. E., Berman, J. Z. & Small, D. A. (2014). Selfish or selfless? On the signal value of emotion in altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037207 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barclay, P. (2004). Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons”. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bereczkei, T., Birkas, B. & Kerekes, Z. (2010). The presence of others, prosocial traits, and Machiavellianism: A personality × situation approach. Social Psychology, 41, 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000032 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Berman, J. Z., Levine, E. E., Barasch, A. & Small, D. A. (2015). The braggart’s dilemma: On the social rewards and penalties of advertising prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bromley, D. B. (1993). Reputation, image and impression management. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cai, W. & Wu, S. (2017). Powerful people feel less fear of negative evaluation: The mediating role of personal control belief. Social Psychology, 48, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000299 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, D., Shin, F., Liu, X., Ondish, P. & Kraus, M. W. (2017). Defining social class across time and between groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1530–1545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217721174 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Critcher, C. R. & Dunning, D. (2011). No good deed goes unquestioned: Cynical reconstruals maintain belief in the power of self-interest. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1207–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Croson, R., Handy, F. & Shang, J. (2009). Keeping up with the Joneses: The relationship of perceived descriptive social norms, social information, and charitable giving. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 19, 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.232 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cryder, C. E., Loewenstein, G. & Scheines, R. (2013). The donor is in the details. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.08.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ding, Y., Wu, J., Ji, T., Chen, X. & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2017). The rich are easily offended by unfairness: Wealth triggers spiteful rejection of unfair offers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Farrelly, D., Clemson, P. & Guthrie, M. (2016). Are women’s mate preferences for altruism also influenced by physical attractiveness? Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915623698 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feinberg, M., Willer, R. & Schultz, M. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25, 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613510184 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiddick, L. & Cummins, D. (2007). Are perceptions of fairness relationship-specific? The case of noblesse oblige. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600577266 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Flynn, F. J. (2003). How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 539–553. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040648 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Forge, K. L. & Phemister, S. (1987). The effect of prosocial cartoons on preschool children. Child Study Journal, 17, 83–88. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goodman, E., Adler, N. E., Kawachi, I., Frazier, A. L., Huang, B. & Colditz, G. A. (2001). Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: Development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics, 108, e31. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.2.e31 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hardy, C. L. & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402–1413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haslam, S. A. & McGarty, C. (2004). Experimental design and causality in social psychological research. In C. SansoneC. C. MorfA. T. PanterEds., The Sage handbook of methods in social psychology (pp. 237–264). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976190.n11 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heyman, G., Barner, D., Heumann, J. & Schenck, L. (2014). Children’s sensitivity to ulterior motives when evaluating prosocial behavior. Cognitive Science, 38, 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12089 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Iredale, W., Van Vugt, M. & Dunbar, R. (2008). Showing off in humans: Male generosity as a mating signal. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 386–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600302 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jordan, J. J., Hoffman, M., Bloom, P. & Rand, D. G. (2016). Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Nature, 530, 473–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16981 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V. & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. The American Psychologist, 28, 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034225 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kelley, H. H. & Stahelski, A. J. (1970). Social interaction basis of cooperators’ and competitors’ beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029849 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kernis, M. H. & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38006-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kervyn, N., Yzerbyt, V. & Judd, C. M. (2010). Compensation between warmth and competence: Antecedents and consequences of a negative relation between the two fundamental dimensions of social perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 155–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2010.517997 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klein, N. & Epley, N. (2014). The topography of generosity: Asymmetric evaluations of prosocial actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2366–2379. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Koo, M. & Fishbach, A. (2016). Giving the self: Increasing commitment and generosity through giving something that represents one’s essence. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616628607 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kraus, M. W. & Callaghan, B. (2016). Social class and prosocial behavior: The moderating role of public versus private contexts. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616659120 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kraus, M. W., Côté, S. & Keltner, D. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21, 1716–1723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610387613 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L. & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119, 546–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lin-Healy, F. & Small, D. A. (2012). Cheapened altruism: Discounting personally affected prosocial actors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lin-Healy, F. & Small, D. A. (2013). Nice guys finish last and guys in last are nice: The clash between doing well and doing good. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 692–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613476308 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lyle, H. F. & Smith, E. A. (2014). The reputational and social network benefits of prosociality in an Andean community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 4820–4825. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1318372111 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Milinski, M., Semmann, D. & Krambeck, H.-J. (2002). Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 881–883. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.1964 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miller, D. T. (1999). The norm of self-interest. The American Psychologist, 54, 1053–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.12.1053 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2016). China statistical yearbook 2015. Beijing, China: China Statistical Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nelissen, R. M. A. (2008). The price you pay: Cost-dependent reputation effects of altruistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.01.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Newman, G. E. & Cain, D. M. (2014). Tainted altruism: When doing some good is evaluated as worse than doing no good at all. Psychological Science, 25, 648–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504785 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nook, E. C., Ong, D. C., Morelli, S. A., Mitchell, J. P. & Zaki, J. (2016). Prosocial conformity: Prosocial norms generalize across behavior and empathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1045–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216649932 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437, 1291–1298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04131 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oda, R., Niwa, Y., Honma, A. & Hiraishi, K. (2011). An eye-like painting enhances the expectation of a good reputation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.11.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H. & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Piff, P. K. & Robinson, A. R. (2017). Social class and prosocial behavior: Current evidence, caveats, and questions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pirlott, A. G. & MacKinnon, D. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Price, M. E. (2003). Pro-community altruism and social status in a Shuar village. Human Nature, 14, 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1003-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C. & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026086 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Saini, R. & Monga, A. (2008). How I decide depends on what I spend: Use of heuristics is greater for time than for money. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 914–922. https://doi.org/10.1086/525503 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P. & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sperber, D. & Baumard, N. (2012). Moral reputation: An evolutionary and cognitive perspective. Mind & Language, 27, 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12000 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Touré-Tillery, M. & Fishbach, A. (2017). Too far to help: The effect of perceived distance on the expected impact and likelihood of charitable action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 860–876. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000089 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Doesum, N. J., Tybur, J. M. & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2017). Class impressions: Higher social class elicits lower prosociality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. N. & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.73.4.733 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Vugt, M. & Hardy, C. L. (2010). Cooperation for reputation: Wasteful contributions as costly signals in public goods. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209342258 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wedekind, C. & Braithwaite, V. A. (2002). The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity. Current Biology, 12, 1012–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00890-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wu, J., Balliet, D. & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2015). When does gossip promote generosity? Indirect reciprocity under the shadow of the future. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 923–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615595272 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wu, J., Balliet, D. & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2016). Gossip versus punishment: The efficiency of reputation to promote and maintain cooperation. Scientific Reports, 6, 23919. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23919 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z. & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Kervyn, N. & Judd, C. M. (2008). Compensation versus halo: The unique relations between the fundamental dimensions of social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1110–1123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208318602 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zahavi, A. & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar