Does Watching Videos With Natural Scenery Restore Attentional Resources?
A Critical Examination Through a Pre-Registered Within-Subject Experiment
Abstract
Abstract. Existing studies have shown that direct exposure to a real nature environment has a restorative effect on attentional resources after a mentally fatiguing task. However, it remains unclear whether virtual nature simulations can serve as a substitute for real nature experienced in the outdoors to restore executive attention. Given the mixed findings in the literature, the present study sought to examine if viewing videos with natural scenery (vs. a control with urban scenery) restores participants’ working memory capacity – measured by an operation span task – in a high-powered pre-registered within-subject experimental study. Overall, our within-subject experiment did not find any evidence to support the benefit of watching videos with natural scenery on restoration of executive attention. Moreover, the results from our Bayesian analyses further showed substantial support for the null hypothesis. Our study suggests that virtual nature simulations, even with the use of videos, may not be able to replicate the experiences of nature in the outdoors and restore attentional resources.
References
2016). Conceptualization and operationalization of executive function: Executive function. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(1), 10–33. 10.1111/mbe.12100
(2019). Characterizing nature and participant experience in studies of nature exposure for positive mental health: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9,
(Article 2617 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.026172008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
(2012). Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 140(3), 300–305. 10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.012
(2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 249–259. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
(2018). Cognitive strategies and natural environments interact in influencing executive function. Frontiers in Psychology, 9,
(Article 1248 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.012482019). Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective. Science Advances, 5(7),
(Article eaax0903 . 10.1126/sciadv.aax09032015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41–50. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.005
(2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health: Nature experience, cognitive function, and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249(1), 118–136. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x
(2019). Testing attention restoration in a virtual reality driving simulator. Frontiers in Psychology, 10,
(Article 250 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.002502019). Sometimes nature doesn’t work: Absence of attention restoration in older adults exposed to environmental scenes. Experimental Aging Research, 45(4), 372–385. 10.1080/0361073X.2019.1627497
(2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1–8. 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
(2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(12), 547–552. 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005
(2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786. 10.3758/BF03196772
(2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
(2014). Evaluating visual and auditory contributions to the cognitive restoration effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,
(Article 548 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.005482021). Watching a nature video improves negative affect and stress but does not change positive affect [Master Thesis]. University of Glasgow.
(2009). Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12(5), 402–409. 10.1177/1087054708323000
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. 10.3758/BF03193146
(2017). Do the effects of working memory training depend on baseline ability level? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1677–1689. 10.1037/xlm0000426
(2015). Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 43, 226–236. 10.3758/s13421-014-0461-7
(2022). An exploratory study on the effect of virtual environments on cognitive performances and psychophysiological responses. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(10), 666–671. 10.1089/cyber.2021.0162
(2016). Mindfulness meditation practice and executive functioning: Breaking down the benefit. Consciousness and Cognition, 40, 116–130. 10.1016/j.concog.2016.01.005
(2014). Not just scenery: Viewing nature pictures improves executive attention in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 40(5), 513–530. 10.1080/0361073X.2014.956618
(2016). Working memory capacity of biological movements predicts empathy traits. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 468–475. 10.3758/s13423-015-0896-2
(2004). Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–16. 10.1002/acp.934
(2015). A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings, 5(3), 948–963. 10.3390/buildings5030948
(2023). Untangling the additive and multiplicative relations between natural scenery exposure and human–animal interaction on affective well-being: Evidence from daily diary studies. Sustainability, 15(4),
(2910 . 10.3390/su150429101999). Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 2: The Bayes factor. Annals of Internal Medicine, 130(12), 1005–1013. 10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00019
(2013). Working memory training may increase working memory capacity but not fluid intelligence. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2409–2419. 10.1177/0956797613492984
(2020). The effect of state gratitude on cognitive flexibility: A within-subject experimental approach. Brain Sciences, 10(7),
(Article 413 . 10.3390/brainsci100704132023). Pre-registration and data for: "Does watching videos with natural scenery restore attentional resources? A critical examination through a pre-registered within-subject experiment. https://researchbox.org/861
(2020). The role of bilingual interactional contexts in predicting interindividual variability in executive functions: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(4), 609–633. 10.1037/xge0000672
(2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109–123.
(2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. 10.1037/met0000201
(2021). Is biodiversity of greenspace important for human health and wellbeing? A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 66,
(Article 127385 . 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.1273852020). In vivo nature exposure as a positive psychological intervention: A review of the impact of nature interventions on wellbeing. In E. BrymerM. RogersonJ. Barton (Eds.), Nature and health: Physical activity in nature (pp. 160–174). Routledge.
(2013). Exposure to public natural space as a protective factor for emotional well-being among young people in Canada. BMC Public Health, 13(1),
(Article 407 . 10.1186/1471-2458-13-4072019). Access to daylight and view in an office improves cognitive performance and satisfaction and reduces eyestrain: A controlled crossover study. Building and Environment, 165,
(Article 106379 . 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.1063792022). JASP (0.16.3). https://jasp-stats.org/2022/06/16/introducing-jasp-0-16-3-quality-control-glms-bayesian-state-space-models-improvements-to-bayesian-anova-and-more/
(2021). Conceptual replication study and meta-analysis suggest simulated nature does not reliably restore pure executive attention measured by the attention network task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78,
(Article 101709 . 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.1017092022). Water and meadow views both afford perceived but not performance-based attention restoration: Results from two experimental studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13,
(Article 809629 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.8096292011). Is love for green in our genes? A critical analysis of evolutionary assumptions in restorative environments research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(4), 261–268. 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.07.004
(2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 169–183. 10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169
(2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 507–542. 10.1177/00139160121973115
(1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
(2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 43–57. 10.1177/1745691609356784
(2021). Rstatix: Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests (0.7.0) [R]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rstatix/index.html
(2022). Top-down processing and nature connectedness predict psychological and physiological effects of nature. Environment and Behavior, 54(5), 917–945. 10.1177/00139165221107535
(2017). Cognitive markers of attentional restoration while viewing natural and urban environments [Master Thesis]. University of Alberta. 10.7939/R3HD7P65P
(1990). Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(6), 1118–1133. 10.1037/0278-7393.16.6.1118
(2013). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139087759
(2021). Burnout and job performance: A two-wave study on the mediating role of employee cognitive functioning. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(5), 692–704. 10.1080/1359432X.2021.1892818
(2021). Effect of a virtual reality-based restorative environment on the emotional and cognitive recovery of individuals with mild-to-moderate anxiety and depression. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17),
(Article 9053 . 10.3390/ijerph181790532016). Harold Jeffreys’s default Bayes factor hypothesis tests: Explanation, extension, and application in psychology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 19–32. 10.1016/j.jmp.2015.06.004
(2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643. 10.1177/0013916508319745
(2017). Into the woods or a stroll in the park: How virtual contact with nature impacts positive and negative affect. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7),
(786 . 10.3390/ijerph140707862010). The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: Evidence for a common executive attention construct. Neuropsychology, 24(2), 222–243. 10.1037/a0017619
(2021). Beating the blues by viewing Green: Depressive symptoms predict greater restoration from stress and negative affect after viewing a nature video. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 75,
(Article 101594 . 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.1015942000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
(2008). Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 19(6), 549–557. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02122.x
(2011). Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 16(4), 406–419. 10.1037/a0024377
(2021). Restoring attentional resources with nature: A replication study of Berto’s (2005) paradigm including commentary from Dr. Rita Berto. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 63(6), 1046–1060. 10.1177/0018720820909287
(2019). A comparison of nature and urban environments on creative thinking across different levels of reality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 44–51. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.006
(2018). Can nature walks with psychological tasks improve mood, self-reported restoration, and sustained attention? Results from two experimental field studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2057. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02057
(2015). Is viewing a nature video after work restorative? Effects on blood pressure, task performance, and long-term memory. Environment and Behavior, 47(9), 947–969. 10.1177/0013916514533187
(2003). World population, food, natural resources, and survival. World Futures, 59(3–4), 145–167. 10.1080/02604020310124
(2017). Working memory capacity predicts effective multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 450–462. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.008
(2020). The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 21(3), 1145–1167. 10.1007/s10902-019-00118-6
(2021). Brief mindfulness breathing exercises and working memory capacity: Findings from two experimental approaches. Brain Sciences, 11(2),
(Article 175 . 10.3390/brainsci110201752020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (3.6.3). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
(2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(3), 164–171. 10.1027/1015-5759/a000123
(2021). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research (2.1.6) [R]. Northwestern University.
(2019). Understanding nature and its cognitive benefits. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 496–502. 10.1177/0963721419854100
(2019). Positive effects of nature on cognitive performance across multiple experiments: Test order but not affect modulates the cognitive effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 10,
(Article 1413 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.014132019). Cognitive restoration in children following exposure to nature: Evidence from the attention network task and mobile eye tracking. Frontiers in Psychology, 10,
(Article 42 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.000422016). Happiness increases verbal and spatial working memory capacity where sadness does not: Emotion, working memory and executive control. Cognition and Emotion, 30(5), 925–938. 10.1080/02699931.2015.1034091
(1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 77–85. 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90016-0
(1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. AltmanJ. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). Springer.
(2009). Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory, 17(6), 635–654. 10.1080/09658210902998047
(2010). Restorative effects of virtual nature settings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(5), 503–512. 10.1089/cyber.2009.0308
(2019). Of cricket chirps and car horns: The effect of nature sounds on cognitive performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 522–530. 10.3758/s13423-018-1539-1
(2021). Attention, working-memory control, working-memory capacity, and sport performance: The moderating role of athletic expertise. European Journal of Sport Science, 21(2), 240–249. 10.1080/17461391.2020.1739143
(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
(2019). A dose of nature: Two three-level meta-analyses of the beneficial effects of exposure to nature on children’s self-regulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65,
(Article 101326 . 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.1013262019). Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Scientific Reports, 9(1),
(Article 7730 . 10.1038/s41598-019-44097-32017). Natural environments and subjective wellbeing: Different types of exposure are associated with different aspects of wellbeing. Health & Place, 45, 77–84. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.008
(2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for data analysis (2nd ed.). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
(2013). Positive affect improves working memory: Implications for controlled cognitive processing. Cognition & Emotion, 27(3), 474–482. 10.1080/02699931.2012.713325
(2022). Cognitive-emotional benefits of weekly exposure to nature: A Taiwanese study on young adults. Sustainability, 14(13),
(Article 7828 . 10.3390/su14137828