Bidirectional Mapping Between the Symbolic Number System and the Approximate Number System
Differences in Connection Strength
Abstract
Abstract. Previous studies have discussed the symmetry of bidirectional mapping between approximate number system (ANS) and symbolic number system (SNS). However, these studies neglected the essential significance of bidirectional mapping in the development of numerical cognition. That is, with age, the connection strength between the ANS and SNS in ANS-SNS mapping could be higher than that in SNS-ANS mapping. Therefore, this study attempted to explore the symmetry of bidirectional mapping by examining whether the connection between the ANS and SNS is the same. Using two types of dot array materials (extensive and intensive) and sequence priming paradigms, this study found a stable negative priming effect in the ANS-SNS priming task, but no priming effect in the SNS-ANS priming task. In addition, although sensory cues (extensive and intensive) could affect performance in the ANS-SNS mapping task, these cues did not affect performance in the ANS-SNS priming task. In general, this study provides valuable insight into the symmetry of bidirectional mapping.
References
(2000). The mind in the middle. In H. T. ReisC. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). Cambridge University Press.
(2016). Using cognitive training studies to unravel the mechanisms by which the approximate number system supports symbolic math ability. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10(8), 73–80. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.05.002
(2009). Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 83–91. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.007
(2013). Set size, individuation, and attention to shape. Cognition, 126(2), 258–267. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.007
(2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press.
(2012). Impact of high mathematics education on the number sense. Plos One, 7(7), e33832. 10.1371/journal.pone.0033832
(2007). Semantic numerical representation in blind subjects: The role of vision in the spatial format of the mental number line. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 101–119. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/17470210600598635
(2012). Numerosity, abstraction, and the emergence of symbolic thinking. Current Anthropology, 53(2), 204–225. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1086/664818
(2011). Under- and over-estimation: A bi-directional mapping process between symbolic and non-symbolic representations of number? Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 39–49. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000064
(2012). Over-estimation in numerosity estimation tasks: More than an attentional bias? Acta Psychologica, 140(3), 246–251. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.05.003
(1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic. Cortex, 33(2), 219–250. 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70002-9
(2005). Control over non-numerical parameters in numerosity experiments [Electronic version]. Unpublished manuscript. https://www.unicog.org
(2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 487–506. 10.1080/02643290244000239
(2019). Bidirectional, longitudinal associations between math ability and approximate number system precision in childhood. Journal of Cognition and Development, 20(1), 56–74. 10.1080/15248372.2018.1551218
(2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307–314. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
(2017). Universal and uniquely human factors in spontaneous number perception. Nature Communications, 8(1), 13968. 10.1038/ncomms13968
(2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive sciences, 4(2), 59–65. 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01424-2
(2013). Adolescents' functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLoS One, 8(1), e54651. 10.1371/journal.pone.0054651
(2016). Sensory-integration system rather than approximate number system underlies numerosity processing: A critical review. Acta Psychologica, 171(11), 17–35. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.09.003
(2010). The development of automated access to symbolic and non-symbolic number knowledge in children: An ERP study. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(10), 1999–2008. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06994.x
(2011). Measuring the approximate number system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(11), 2099–2109. 10.1080/17470218.2011.574710
(2019). What predicts mathematics achievement? Developmental change in 5- and 7-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 178(2), 104–120. 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.013
(2019). How are symbols and nonsymbolic numerical magnitudes related? Exploring bidirectional relationships in early numeracy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(3), 143–156. 10.1111/mbe.12206
(2013). Differences in the acuity of the approximate number system in adults: The effect of mathematical ability. Acta Psychologica, 144(3), 506–512. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.001
(2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the “number sense”: The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1457–1465. 10.1037/a0012682
(2012). Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive internet-based sample. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(28), 11116–11120. 10.1073/pnas.1200196109
(2003). Attending to the distractor and old/new discriminations in negative priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 56(3), 421–443. 10.1080/02724980244000477
(2009). Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: The numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(1), 17–29. 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.001
(2011). Non-verbal number acuity correlates with symbolic mathematics achievement: But only in children. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(6), 1222–1229. 10.3758/s13423-011-0154-1
(2008). Calibrating the mental number line. Cognition, 106(3), 1221–1247. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.004
(2014). Cutting in line: Discontinuities in the use of large numbers by adults. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 36, No. 36. Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7tb2h41q#author
(2017). From “sense of number” to “sense of magnitude”: The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40(8), 1–62. 10.1017/s0140525x16000960
(2021). Materials and data for “Bidirectional Mapping between the Symbolic Number System and the Approximate Number System”. https://osf.io/p3nvq/
(2017). The integration of symbolic and non-symbolic representations of exact quantity in preschool children. Cognition, 166(9), 382–397. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.033
(2015). Symbolic integration, not symbolic estrangement, for double-digit numbers. https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2015/papers/0246/ index.html
(2018). The integration between non-symbolic and symbolic numbers: Evidence from an EEG study. Brain and Behavior, 8(16), e00938. 10.1002/brb3.938
(2015). Foundations of children's numerical and mathematical skills: The roles of symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of numerical magnitude. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 48(2015), 93–116. 10.1016/bs.acdb.2014.11.003
(2018). Symbolic number skills predict growth in nonsymbolic number skills in kindergarteners. Developmental Psychology, 54(3), 440–457. 10.1037/dev0000445
(2011). Preschoolers' precision of the approximate number system predicts later school mathematics performance. PLoS One, 6(9), e23749. 10.1371/journal.pone.0023749
(2013). Estimation abilities of large numerosities in kindergartners. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(5), 518. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00518
(2015). Children's mappings between number words and the approximate number system. Cognition, 138(5), 102–121. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.008
(2017). The relation between approximate number system and early arithmetic: The mediation role of numerical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 157(5), 111–124. 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.12.011
(2010). Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(12), 542–551. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.008
(2009). How humans count: Numerosity and the parietal cortex. The Neuroscientist, 15(3), 261–273. 10.1177/1073858409333073
(2013). Education enhances the acuity of the nonverbal approximate number system. Psychological Science, 24(6), 1037–1043. 10.1177/0956797612464057
(2007). A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 53(2), 293–305. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.022
(2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an amazonian indigene group. Science, 306(5695), 499–503. 10.1126/science.1102085
(2016). The symbol grounding problem revisited: A thorough evaluation of the ANS mapping account and the proposal of an alternative account based on symbol–symbol associations. Frontiers in Psychology, 07(10), 1581. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01581
(2014). From small to large: Numerical discrimination by young domestic chicks (gallus gallus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128(3), 163–171. 10.1037/a0034513
(2017). One tamed at a time: A new approach for controlling continuous magnitudes in numerical comparison tasks. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1120–1127. 10.3758/s13428-016-0772-7
(2016). Magnitude knowledge: The common core of numerical development. Developmental Science, 19(3), 341–361. 10.1111/desc.12395
(2012). Emergence of a “visual number sense” in hierarchical generative models. Nature Neuroscience, 15(2), 194–196. 10.1038/nn.2996
(2013). How are number words mapped to approximate magnitudes? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(2), 389–402. 10.1080/17470218.2012.715655
(2014). Inference and association in children's early numerical estimation. Child Development, 85(4), 1740–1755. 10.1111/cdev.12211
(2010). How 15 hundred is like 15 cherries: Effect of progressive alignment on representational changes in numerical cognition. Child Development, 81(6), 1768–1786. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01509.x
(1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 37(4), 591–611. 10.1080/14640748508400921
(2020). Are the acuities of magnitude representations of different types and ranges of numbers related? Testing the core assumption of the integrated theory of numerical development. Cognitive Development, 54(5), 100888. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100888
(2019). The bidirectional mapping mechanism between symbolic number system and approximate number system [Doctoral dissertation]. Jilin University.
