Abstract
Abstract. The mere exposure effect refers to the well-established finding that people evaluate a stimulus more positively after repeated exposure to that stimulus. We investigated whether a change in stimulus evaluation can occur also when participants are not repeatedly exposed to a stimulus, but are merely instructed that one stimulus will occur frequently and another stimulus will occur infrequently. We report seven experiments showing that (1) mere exposure instructions influence implicit stimulus evaluations as measured with an Implicit Association Test (IAT), personalized Implicit Association Test (pIAT), or Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP), but not with an Evaluative Priming Task (EPT), (2) mere exposure instructions influence explicit evaluations, and (3) the instruction effect depends on participants’ memory of which stimulus will be presented more frequently. We discuss how these findings inform us about the boundary conditions of mere exposure instruction effects, as well as the mental processes that underlie mere exposure and mere exposure instruction effects.
References
(1935).
Attitudes . In C. MurchisonEd., A handbook of social psychology (pp. 789–843). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.(2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytical thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569
(2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4, R package v. 1.0-6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
(1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
(1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.54
(1989). Recognition memory and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 968–976. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.968
(2003).
A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes . In J. MuschK. C. KlauerEds., The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 219–244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.(2006). Using the Implicit Association Test does not rule out an impact of conscious propositional knowledge on evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 37, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2005.12.002
(2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600006491
(2009a). How do people evaluate objects? A brief review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00162.x
(2009b). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.1.1
(2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12111
(2007). Novel attitudes can be faked on the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 972–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.007
(2016). Evaluative conditioning as a symbolic phenomenon: On the relation between evaluative conditioning, evaluative conditioning via instructions, and persuasion. Social Cognition, 34, 480–494. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2016.34.5.480
(2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014211
(2013). Exposure is not enough: Suppressing stimuli from awareness can abolish the mere exposure effect. PLoS One, 8, e77726. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077726
(2009). How to like yourself better, or chocolate less: Changing implicit attitudes with one IAT task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1098–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.008
(2007). An examination of different explanations for the mere exposure effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1086/513050
(1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
(1876). Vorschule der Aesthetik
[Introduction to esthetics] . Leipzig, Germany: Breitkopf and Härtel.(2006). Is conditioning a useful framework for understanding the development and treatment of phobias? Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.05.010
(2005). Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the Implicit Association Tests. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 307–316.
(2012). Evaluative conditioning without directly experienced pairings of the conditioned and the unconditioned stimuli. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1657–1674. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.665061
(2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
(2014).
Implicit measures in social and personality psychology . In H. T. ReisC. M. JuddEds., Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 283–310). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.(2014). What drives priming effects in the Affect Misattribution Procedure? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213502548
(2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196313
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
(2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
(2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psycho-physiological and individual differences approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 889–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201277011
(2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018916
(2017). A comparative analysis of different evaluative learning procedures. Manuscript in preparation.
. (2011). Inquisit 3.0. [Computer Software]. Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software LLC.
(1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306
(1961). Theory of probability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial evaluations and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 957–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.957
(2006). Two bases of the compatibility effect in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2102–2120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500451141
(2012). Disentangling stereotype activation and stereotype application in the Stereotype Misperception Task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 205–224.
(2011). Intuitive and deliberative judgements are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118, 97–109.
(1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557–558. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7352271
(2017). Repeated evaluative pairings and evaluative statements: How effectively do they shift implicit attitudes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000239
(1937). The influence of familiarization on preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053692
(2013). Estimating the contributions of associations and recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The ReAL model for the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030734
(2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11, 462–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00289
(2007). Recognising what you like: Examining the relation between the mere-exposure effect and recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440500487454
(2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.565
(2004). Reducing the influence of extra-personal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653
(2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
(2010).
A history of implicit social cognition: Where is it coming from? Where is it now? Where is it going? . In B. GawronskiB. K. PayneEds., Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Guilford Press.(2014). Do CS-US pairings actually matter? A within-subject comparison of instructed fear conditioning with and without actual CS-US pairings. PLoS One, 9, e84888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084888
(2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
(1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008
(2009). Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701822975
(2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/00963445.133.2.139
(2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
(1975).
Detecting demand characteristics in laboratory experiments in consumer research: The case of repetition-affect research . In M. J. SchlingerEd., Advances in consumer research (Vol. 2, pp. 713–724). Ann Abor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.(2013). Consider the source: persuasion of implicit evaluations is moderated by source credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212472374
(2009). Modulation of semantic priming by feature-specific attention allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.03.004
(2007). Affective priming of non-affective semantic categorization responses. Experimental Psychology, 54, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.54.1.44
(2012). Memory enhances the mere exposure effect. Psychology & Marketing, 29(12), 995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20581
(2004). When preferences need inferences: A direct comparison of the automaticity of cognitive versus affective priming. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 81–93.
(2013). On the controllability of evaluative-priming effects: Some limits that are none. Cognition & Emotion, 27, 632–657.
(2016). Controlling the “uncontrollable”: Faking effects on the Affect Misattribution Procedure. Cognition & Emotion, 30, 1470–1484.
(2012). The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a002565
(2016). Approach-Avoidance Training effects are Moderated by Awareness of Stimulus-Action Contingencies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215615335
(2015). Instruction-based approach-avoidance effects: Changing stimulus evaluation via mere instruction to approach or avoid stimuli. Experimental Psychology, 62, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000282
(2016). Instructing implicit processes: When instructions to approach or avoid influence implicit but not explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.002
(2016). Failures to change stimulus evaluations by means of subliminal approach and avoidance training. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, e1–e15. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000039
(2017). Relational information moderates approach-avoidance instruction effects on implicit evaluation. Acta Psychologica, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.016
(2017). Mechanisms underlying approach-avoidance instruction effects on implicit evaluation: Results of a preregistered adversarial collaboration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.004
(2017). Mere exposure effects on implicit evaluation: The moderating role of evaluation task, number of stimulus presentations and memory of stimulus presentations. Manuscript in preparation.
(2004). The mere exposure effect and recognition memory. Cognition & Emotion, 18, 1055–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000374
(2010).
A practical guide to sequential priming and related tasks . In B. GawronskiB. K. PayneEds., Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 95–116). New York, NY: Guilford Press.(2007).
Measuring attitudes through priming . In B. WittenbrinkN. SchwarzEds., Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 17–58). New York, NY: Guilford Press.(2013). Make the manikin move: Symbolic approach-avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 738–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.817413
(1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs, 9, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
(2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.0015428
(2014). When does relational information influence evaluative conditioning? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2105–2122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.907324
(2016). The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000056
