Neither State or Trait Anxiety Alter the Response to Distracting Emotionally Neutral Sounds
Abstract
Attentional control theory suggests that heightened anxiety, whether due to trait or state factors, causes an increased vulnerability to distraction even when the distracters are emotionally neutral. Recent passive oddball studies appear to support this theory in relation to the distraction caused by emotionally neutral sounds. However such studies have manipulated emotional state via the content of task stimuli, thus potentially confounding changes in emotion with differences in task demands. To identify the effect of anxiety on the distraction caused by emotionally neutral sounds, 50 participants completed a passive oddball task requiring emotionally neutral sounds to be ignored. Crucially, state anxiety was manipulated independent of the task stimuli (via unrelated audiovisual stimuli) thus removing confounds relating to task demands. Neither state or trait anxiety was found to influence the susceptibility to distraction by emotionally neutral sounds. These findings contribute to the ongoing debate concerning the impact of emotion on attention.
References
(2012). Trait anxiety focuses spatial attention. Emotion, 12, 8–12. doi: 10.1037/A0026310.
(2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215. doi: 10.1038/Nrn755.
(2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance new developments from Attentional Control Theory. European Psychologist, 14, 168–176. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.168.
(2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 274–290. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406920.
(2008a). Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 1199–1206. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06411.x.
(2008b). Negative emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing. Neuroreport, 19, 503–507.
(2009). Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing in superior temporal gyrus. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1521–1529. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn188.
(1992). Anxiety and susceptibility to distraction. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 793–798.
(2011). New perspectives in Attentional Control Theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 955–960. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.019.
(2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional Control Theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336.
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/Bf03193146.
(2010). The blues broaden, but the nasty narrows: Attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity. Psychological Science, 21, 211–215. doi: 10.1177/0956797609359622.
(2008). Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of gender differences in the modulation of distraction by the emotional context. Biological Psychology, 79, 307–316. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.07.006.
(2010). Tuning the brain for novelty detection under emotional threat: The role of increasing gamma phase-synchronization. Neuroimage, 49, 1038–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.059.
(2011). Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces. Emotion, 11, 346–353. doi: 10.1037/A0022771.
(1939). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
(2012). Avoidance of harm and anxiety: A role for the nucleus accumbens. Neuroimage, 62, 189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.059.
(2012). Enhanced attentional capture in trait anxiety. Emotion, 12, 213–216. doi: 10.1037/A0026156.
(1971). Assessment and analysis of handedness – Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97.
(2012). Trait anxiety and the dynamics of attentional control. Biological Psychology, 89, 252–259. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.016.
(2010). Attention and anxiety: Different attentional functioning under state and trait anxiety. Psychological Science, 21, 298–304. doi: 10.1177/0956797609359624.
(2014). Sadness increased distraction by auditory deviant stimuli. Emotion, 14(1), 203–213. doi: 10.1037/a0034289.
(2010). The involuntary capture of attention by sound: Novelty and Postnovelty distraction in young and older adults. Experimental Psychology, 57, 68–76. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000009.
(2008). The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition, 106, 408–432. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.008.
(2011). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119, 374–380. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.001.
(2010). Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: The role of the distracter’s informational value. Cognition, 115, 504–511. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.002.
(2009). Subchronic SSRI administration reduces insula response during affective anticipation in healthy volunteers. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 12, 1009–1020. doi: 10.1017/S1461145709990149.
(1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
(2008). The effect of anxiety on the cognitive functioning in non-clinical schizotypal individuals. Current Psychology, 27, 16–28. doi: 10.1007/s12144-008-9021-2.
