Abstract
Recent studies on the conceptualization of abstract concepts suggest that the concept of time is represented along a left-right horizontal axis, such that left-to-right readers represent past on the left and future on the right. Although it has been demonstrated with strong consistency that the localization (left or right) of visual stimuli could modulate temporal judgments, results obtained with auditory stimuli are more puzzling, with both failures and successes at finding the effect in the literature. The present study supports an account based on the relative relevance of visual versus auditory-spatial information in the creation of a frame of reference to map time: The auditory location of words interacted with their temporal meaning only when auditory information was made more relevant than visual spatial information by blindfolding participants.
References
2006). Separate attentional resources for vision and audition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273, 1339–1345.
(2005). Writing direction influences spatial cognition. In , Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 412–417). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1891). Analyse expérimentale: De quelques éléments de la sensation de poids
([Experimental analysis: On some of the elements of sensations of weight] . Archives de Physiologie Normale et Pathologique, 3, 122–135.1997). Verbs, events and spatial representations. Neuropsychologia, 26, 284–391.
(1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.
(2007). How writing system and age influence spatial representations of actions. Psychological Science, 18, 487–491.
(2010). How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations. Brain and Cognition, 72, 333–336.
(2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34, 1430–1451.
(2008). Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex, 44, 454–461.
(1995). Creating a unified representation of visual and auditory space in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 19–43.
(2011). The sound of time: Cross-modal convergence in the spatial structuring of time. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 437–443.
(1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2007). More accurate sound localization induced by short-term light deprivation. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1215–1222.
(2003). Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: Nature or culture? Psychological Science, 14, 296–301.
(1991). Sound localization by human listeners. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 135–159.
(2001). The color of odors. Brain and Language, 79, 309–320.
(2010a). Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 17–24.
(2010b). Is the future the right time? Experimental Psychology, 57, 308–314.
(2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 793–797.
(2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 512–516.
(2011). Flexible foundations of abstract thought: A review and a theory. In , Spatial dimensions of social thought (pp. 39–108). Leipzig, Germany: de Gruyter Mouton.
(2008). In hindsight, life flows from left to right. Psychological Research, 74, 59–70.
(2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburg, KS: Psychology Software Tools.
(1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.
(2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30, 745–757.
(1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515–557.
(2010). Left-right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition, 117, 126–138.
(2008). Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental time-line. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 426–430.
(1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 638–667.
(2005). Why seeing is believing: Merging auditory and visual worlds. Neuron, 48, 489–496.
(2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the REVERSE SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 165–190.
(