Individual Differences in the Attentional Blink
The Important Role of Irrelevant Information
Abstract
A well-established phenomenon in the study of attention is the attentional blink (AB): a deficit in reporting the second of two targets when it occurs 200–500 ms after the first. Although the effect has been shown to be robust in a wide variety of task conditions, we recently reported that some individuals show little or no AB, and presented psychophysiological evidence that target processing differs in nonblinkers (who do not show an AB) and blinkers (who do show an AB). Here we present evidence that the level of distractor processing and subsequent interference with target identification processes also differs between the two groups. In one task, two masked targets were centrally presented at varying temporal intervals, with or without additional distractors. In a second task, the masked targets were presented eccentrically, with or without the presence of a central sequential stream of the task-irrelevant distractors. In both cases, the presence of distractors led to an increased AB magnitude in blinkers, whereas performance for nonblinkers remained relatively unaffected. The results thus support the hypothesis that nonblinkers are more efficient in ignoring irrelevant information than blinkers.
References
(2006). Relationships between attentional blink magnitude, RSVP target accuracy, and performance on other cognitive tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1472–1483.
(2005). Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalized selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 47, 907–918.
(1998). Vision and attention: The role of training. Nature, 393, 424–425.
(1999). The roles of location specificity and masking mechanisms in the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 798–809.
(1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109–127.
(2007). Working memory and the Attentional Blink: Blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1051–1057.
(1997). Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory. Nature, 386, 608–611.
(1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
(1997). Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities. Nature, 387, 808–810.
(1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030–1044.
(2003). Focal distraction: Spatial shifts of attention are not required for contingent capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 78–91.
(2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534–537.
(2004). Modulation of long-range neural synchrony reflects temporal limitations of visual attention in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 13050–13055.
(2007). Competing neural responses for auditory and visual decisions. PLoS ONE, 2, e320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000320.
(2003). Sources of interference in the attentional blink: Target-distractor similarity revisited. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 188–201.
(2006). Cuing and stimulus effects on the P3 and the AB. Acta Psychologica, 123, 204–218.
(2005). Timing attention: Cuing target onset interval attenuates the attentional blink. Memory & Cognition, 33, 234–240.
(2009). A quick visual mind can be a slow auditory mind: Individual differences in attentional selection across modalities. Experimental Psychology, 56, 33–40.
(2008). Working memory capacity, intelligence, and the magnitude of the attentional blink revisited. Experimental Brain Research, doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1551-1.
(2006). Quick minds don’t blink: Electrophysiological correlates of individual differences in attentional selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1423–1438.
(2007). Cross-task repetition amnesia: Impaired recall of RSVP targets held in memory for a secondary task. Acta Psychologica, 125, 319–333.
(1993). The frontal lobes and voluntary action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1994). Frontal lobes and behaviour. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 207–211.
(1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849–860.
(2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245–277.
(1997). Ventral prefrontal cortex is not essential for working memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4829–4838.
(2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
(2005). Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1391–1400.
(1997). The attentional blink: A view on attention and a glimpse on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 291–296.
(1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 357–371.
(1988). Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. Science, 240, 338–340.
(2006). Software for generating psychological experiments. Experimental Psychology, 53, 218–232.
(2004). Rapid serial visual distractor: Task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1418–1432.
(2006). The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1436–1451.
(1997). Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 593–600.
