Two of a Kind or Distant Relatives?
A Multimethod Investigation of the Overlap Between Personality Traits and Character Strengths
Abstract
Abstract: Allport’s distinction of personality devaluated (personality) and personality evaluated (character) raised the question of whether the character is redundant with personality, which still remains open today. The present study hence compares the Five-Factor Model of personality and the VIA-classification (Values in Action) of character strengths across two methods (self- and peer-reports) and two levels of abstraction (domains/factors and scales/facets). A sample of 152 participants and 152 peer-raters completed the NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised and the VIA Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS). Personality and character assessed with these inventories were found to strongly overlap, yet the different operationalizations were rarely redundant (except for three personality facets). Multitrait-multimethod analyses mostly supported the convergent and discriminant validity of personality and character. Interpersonal strengths (e.g., teamwork) and abstract character factors lacked discriminant validity to personality facets. The present investigation contributes to a better understanding of the interplay between personality and character and provides an impetus for future research on the “virtue gap” between devaluated and evaluated personality traits.
References
1921). Personality and character. Psychological Bulletin, 18(9), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0066265
(1927). Concepts of trait and personality. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073629
(1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. No. 211. Psychological Review Monographs.
(2022). Personality and character: A comparative qualitative analysis of trait descriptions in NEO-PI-3 and character strengths and virtues. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23, 3055–3094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00535-0
(2014). Incremental criterion prediction of personality facets over factors: Obtaining unbiased estimates and confidence intervals. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.005
(2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599
(1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
(2011). Analyzing multitrait-mulitmethod data with multilevel confirmatory factor analysis: An application to the validation of the State-Trait Cheerfulness Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.12.007
(1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory. Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
(2019). Personality across the life span. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 423–448. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103244
(2021). Study between personality traits and character strengths in adolescents. Current Psychology, 40, 2067–2072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0146-2
(2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
(2008). Values in Action Scale and the Big 5: An empirical indication of structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.003
(2014). Scale- and item-level factor analyses of the VIA Inventory of Strengths. Assessment, 21, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112450612
(2020). Are measures of character and personality distinct? Evidence from observed-score and true-score analyses. Assessment, 27, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117738047
(1998). Gordon Allport, character, and the “culture of personality”. History of Psychology, 1(1), 52–68.
(2011).
(Character and personality: Connections between positive psychology and personality psychology . In K. M. SheldonT. B. KashdanM. F. StegerEds., Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 207–227). Oxford University Press.2004). NEO-PI-R. NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae. Revidierte Fassung. Manual
([NEO-PI-R. The Costa and McCrae’s NEO-personality inventory. Revised version. The manual] . Hogrefe.2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127
(2005).
(Assessment of character strengths . In G. P. KoocherJ. C. NorcrossS. S. Hill IIIEds., Psychologists’ desk reference (2nd ed., pp. 93–98). Oxford University Press.2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press; American Psychological Association.
(2010). Adaptation and validation of the German version of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000022
(2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
(2020). Scrutinizing the criteria for character strengths: Laypersons assert that every strength is positively morally valued, even in the absence of tangible outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article
(591028 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.5910282000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
(2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908
(