Temperament and Coping Activity Under Stress of Changing Intensity Over Time
Abstract
Temperament is probably an important factor that influences coping activity. The framework of the study was the Regulative Theory of Temperament by Strelau, where six temperamental traits are distinguished: emotional reactivity, perseveration, activity, briskness, sensory sensitivity, and endurance. These traits were hypothesized to be connected to coping activity in accordance with their psychological characteristics. It was also expected that the associations between temperament and coping activity should depend on stress intensity. Participants were 278 diabetics and 232 patients after first myocardial infarction (MI). The study was longitudinal and two diseases had been purposely selected so as to represent stress intensity either increasing (in diabetes) or decreasing (after MI) over time. Temperamental traits as well as coping activity components: cognitive appraisal, affect, and coping strategies were measured using self-report questionnaires. As hypothesized, temperamental traits were connected to coping activity. Phase-related changes in coping activity confirmed an increase in stress levels in diabetics, while cardiac patients tended to experience the situation as more challenging. While the expectation referring to the differential role of temperament under different levels of stress intensity was not confirmed, the connections of temperament with coping activity were found to decrease under long-term stress.
References
(1990). Coping as a personality process: A prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 525–537.
(2004). Situational and dispositional coping: An examination of their relation to personality, cognitive appraisals and psychological distress. European Journal of Personality, 18, 221–238.
(2001). Personality and stress coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 317–327.
(1995). Adaptacja Skali Uczuć Pozytywnych i Negatywnych (PANAS) autorstwa Davida Watsona
[A Polish adaptation of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) by David Watson] . Raport z badań [Research report], Lublin, Poland.(2003). The relationship of individual and communal state-trait coping and interpersonal resources as trust, empathy and responsibility. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 16, 307–320.
(1994). Situational coping and coping dispositions in a stressful transaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 184–195.
(1996). Personality and coping: A reconceptualization. In , Handbook of coping. Theory, research, applications (pp. 44–61). New York, NY: Wiley.
(1994). State-trait coping, state-trait anxiety and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 663–670.
(1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844–854.
(1998). Coping with health problems: Developing a reliable and valid multidimensional measure. Psychological Assessment, 10, 195–205.
(1997). Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Social Science and Medicine, 45, 1207–1221.
(2008). The case for positive emotions in the stress process. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 21, 3–14.
(2009). Questions, answers, issues, and next steps in stress and coping research. European Psychologist, 14, 72–77.
(1988). Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 466–475.
(2000). Stress, positive emotion, and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 115–118.
(2006). Positive affect and meaning-focused coping during significant psychological stress. In , The scope of social psychology: Theory and application (pp. 193–208). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
(1999). Longitudinal study on glycaemic control and quality of life in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus referred for intensified control. Diabetes Medicine, 16, 23–30.
(2009). Proactive coping, positive affect, and well-being: Testing for mediation using path analysis. European Psychologist, 14, 29–39.
(1997). Coping style and its role in coping with stressful encounters. European Psychologist, 2, 342–351.
(2004). Styl radzenia sobie ze stresem jako indywidualna zmienna wpływająca na funkcjonowanie w sytuacji stresowej
[Style of coping with stress as an individual variable affecting functioning in a stressful situation] . In , Osobowość a ekstremalny stres[Personality and extreme stress] (pp. 238–263). Gdańsk, Poland: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.(1999). Anxiety and hope during the course of three different somatic illnesses: A longitudinal study. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 68, 304–312.
(1994). Galen’s prophecy: Temperament in human nature. New York, NY: Basic Books.
(2002). When oral agents fail: Practical barriers to starting insulin. International Journal of Obesity, 26, 518–524.
(1996). Individual differences in coping. In , Handbook of coping. Theory, research, applications (pp. 381–409). New York, NY: Wiley.
(1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
(1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1, 141–169.
(1992). Individual differences in the coping process: What to know and when to know it. In , Personal coping: theory, research and practice (pp. 77–91). New York, NY: Praeger.
(1972). Fundamental properties of the human nervous system. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
(2008). Individual differences in the use of proactive coping strategies by middle-aged and older adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 28–33.
(2009). Testing personality-coping diatheses for negative and positive affect: A longitudinal evaluation. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 22, 263–281.
(2007). Stress coping and the adjustment process among university freshman. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 20, 51–67.
(2007). Coping after bone marrow transplantation: The predictive roles of optimism and dispositional coping. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 14, 123–129.
(1996). The regulative theory of temperament: Current status. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 131–142.
(1998). Temperament: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
(2008). Temperament as a regulator of behavior: After fifty years of research. New York, NY: Eliot Werner.
(2000). Personality types and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 367–378.
(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
(1982). Psychological reactions to the onset of chronic illness. Social Sciences and Medicine, 16, 889–905.
(2001). Cognitive stress appraisal and quality of life after first myocardial infarction. In , Psychiatric issues in general hospitals (pp. 164–166). Thessaloniki, Greece: Contemporary.
(1997). Formalna Charakterystyka Zachowania, Kwestionariusz Temperamentu (FCZ-KT)
[Formal Characteristics of Behavior, a Questionnaire of Temperament (FCB-QT)] . Warsaw, Poland: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
