Skip to main content
Original Article

Psychometric Properties of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale – Intellectual Disability (BPNSFS-ID)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000366

Abstract. The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale – Intellectual Disability (BPNSFS-ID), an adapted version of the original BPNSFS (Chen, Vansteenkiste, et al., 2015), operationalizes satisfaction and frustration with the three basic psychological needs according to self-determination theory (SDT): autonomy, relatedness, and competence. The current study examined the psychometric properties of the BPNSFS-ID in a group of 186 adults with mild to borderline intellectual disability (MBID). The results indicated an adequate factorial structure of the BPNSFS-ID, comprising the satisfaction and frustration of each of the three needs. The associations between BPNSFS-ID subscales autonomy, relatedness, and competence and the self-determination subscale of the Personal Outcome Scale (POS), the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale – 12 (GSES-12), supported the construct validity. In addition, the BPNSFS-ID demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .92) and 2-week test-retest reliability (r = .81 for the composite subscale autonomy, r = .69 for the composite subscale relatedness, and r = .85 for the composite subscale competence). Overall, the BPNSFS-ID proved to be a valid and reliable measure of basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration among people with MBID.

References

  • Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A. & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1459–1473. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartholomew, K., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M. & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Psychological need thwarting in the sport context: Assessing the darker side of athletic experience. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33, 75–102. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Broer, T., Nieboer, A., Strating, M., Michon, H. & Bal, R. (2011). Constructing the social: an evaluation study of the outcomes and processes of a “social participation” improvement project. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 18, 323–332. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, R., Vansteenkiste, M., Delesie, L. M., Mariman, A. N., Soenens, B., Tobback, E., … Vogelaers, D. P. (2015). Examining the role of psychological need satisfaction in sleep: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 199–204. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, B., van Assche, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B. & Beyers, W. (2015). Does psychological need satisfaction matter when environmental or financial safety are at risk? Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 745–766. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Duriez, B., … Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 216–236. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • de Jong-Gierveld, J. & Kamphuls, F. (1985). The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 289–299. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Jong-Gierveld, J. & van Tilburg, T. (1999). Manual of the Loneliness Scale. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VU University. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L. (2004). Promoting intrinsic motivation and self-determination in people with mental retardation. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 28, 1–29. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., Hodges, R., Pierson, L. & Tomassone, J. (1992). Autonomy and competence as motivational factors in students with learning disabilities and emotional handicaps. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 457–471. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. The American Psychologist, 55, 34–43. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forte, M., Jahoda, A. & Dagnan, D. (2011). An anxious time? Exploring the nature of worries experienced by young people with a mild to moderate intellectual disability as they make the transition to adulthood. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 398–411. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grolnick, W. S. & Ryan, R. M. (1990). Self-perceptions, motivation, and adjustment in children with learning disabilities: A multiple group comparison study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 177–184. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Howell, R. T., Chenot, D., Hill, G. & Howell, C. J. (2011). Momentary happiness: The role of psychological need satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 1–15. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ilardi, B. C., Leone, D., Kasser, T. & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1789–1805. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 367–384. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T. & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H. & Berge, J. M. T. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saris, W. E., Satorra, A. & Van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 561–582. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schalock, R. L., Brown, I., Brown, R., Cummins, R. A., Felce, D., Matikka, L., … Parmenter, T. (2002). Conceptualization, measurement, and application of quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities: Report of an international panel of experts. Mental Retardation, 40, 457–470. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schweizer, K. (2010). Some guidelines concerning the modeling of traits and abilities in test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 1–2. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Sheldon, K. M. & Hilpert, J. C. (2012). The balanced measure of psychological needs (BMPN) scale: An alternative domain general measure of need satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 439–451. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sherer, M., James, E. M., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B. & Rogers, W. R. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tay, L. & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 354–365. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Witte, H., Soenens, B. & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work‐related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 981–1002. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Loon, J., Van Hove, G., Schalock, R. & Claes, C. (2008a). Personal Outcomes Scale, Middelburg, The Netherlands: Arduin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Loon, J., Van Hove, G., Schalock, R. & Claes, C. (2008b). Personal Outcomes Scale; Administration and Standardization Manual, Antwerp, Belgium: Garant. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vansteenkiste, M. & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23, 263–280. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Verdugo, M. A., Arias, B., Gomez, L. E. & Schalock, R. L. (2008). The GENCAT Scale of quality of life: Standardization manual. Barcelona, Spain: Generalitat of Catalonia. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, P. M., Rogers, W. T., Rodgers, W. M. & Wild, T. C. (2006). The psychological need satisfaction in exercise scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 28, 231–251. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woodruff, S. L. & Cashman, J. F. (1993). Task, domain, and general efficacy: A reexamination of the self-efficacy scale. Psychological Reports, 72, 423–432. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar