Psychometric Properties and Validity of the Dyadic Coping Inventory in Portuguese
Abstract
Several studies have shown that dyadic coping, that is, the way couples cope with stress, plays a unique role in intimate relationships. The aim of this study is to validate the Portuguese version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI; Bodenmann, 2008) by analyzing the factorial structure and psychometric properties of the DCI as well as its convergent and criterion validity. A multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in a community sample of 605 participants living in Portugal who had been in a close relationship for at least 2 years. The findings support the hypothesized five-factor structure for the DCI and self- and other-perception, and a two-factor structure for joint dyadic coping. The psychometric properties of the DCI and its criterion validity with other relationship measures (RAS and B-SRQ) were good. These results add an important contribution to the determination of the criterion validity of the DCI with measures of other crucial domains of couples’ functioning (Shared Meaning, Conflict Processes, and Quality of Sexuality, Passion, and Romance); to the cross-cultural validation of the DCI; and to the demonstration that negative DC has a significant effect on intimate relationship processes, which contradicts the findings of previous studies. Moreover, it provides an additional tool for working with Portuguese-speaking individuals all over the world.
References
1997). Dyadic coping – A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140.
(2000). Stress und Coping bei Paaren [
(Stress and coping in couples ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In , Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2008). Dyadisches Coping Inventar (DCI). Testmanual [
(Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI). Test manual ]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.2010). New themes in couple therapy: The role of stress, coping and social support. In , Enhancing couples: The shape of couple therapy to come (pp. 142–156). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe.
(2006). Stress and coping among stable/satisfied, stable/distressed and separated/divorced Swiss couples. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 44, 71–89.
(2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485–493.
(in press ). Social support and dyadic coping: Commonalities and differences.2004). The Couples Coping Enhancement Training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress based upon stress and coping. Family Relations, 53, 477–484.
(2009). Measuring dyadic coping: The factorial structure of Bodenmann’s Dyadic Coping Questionnaire in an Italian sample. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 16, 25–47.
(2012). Dyadic coping in Latino couples: Validity of the Spanish version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping. Advance online publication. doi 10.1080/10615806.2012.699045
(1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically based marital therapy. New York: Norton.
(2003). Gottman Sound Relationship House Questionnaire. In , Conceptualizing and measuring “healthy marriages” for empirical research and evaluation studies: A compendium of measures – Part II (pp.
(25–29, 71–74 ). Washington, DC: Child Trends.2006). The Brief Sound Relationships Questionnaires. In , The art and science of love: A workshop for couples (pp. 291–300). Seattle, WA: The Gottman Institute.
(2008). Gottman method couple therapy. In , Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4th ed., pp. 138–166). New York: Guilford.
(1998). The Relationship Assessment Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 137–142.
(1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55.
(2010). Intimate relationships. New York: Norton.
(1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
(2010). Psychometrics of the dyadic coping inventory in three language groups. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 201–212.
(2008). Casais biculturais e monoculturais: Diferenças e recursos [
(Monocultural and bicultural couples: Differences and resources ] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Lisbon, Portugal.1998/2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
(2010). Romantic partners’ individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 551–559.
(2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 434–457.
(2009). Número de divórcios por 100 casamentos em Portugal [
. (Number of divorces per 100 marriages in Portugal ]. Retrieved from www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Numero+de+divorcios+por+100+casamentos-5312012). Salário mínimo nacional [
. (Minimum living wage ]. Retrieved from www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Salario+minimo+nacional-742009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105–115.
(2005). Emerging perspectives on couples’ coping with stress. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2000). Validation of the Sound Relationship House Scales. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
(2000). Relaçñes entre estilos de vinculação, estilos de resolução de conflito e satisfação nas relaçñes amorosas em mulheres com um relacionamento heterossexual [
(Associations between attachment styles, conflict resolution styles and relationship satisfaction in women with an heterosexual loving relationship ] (Unpublished dissertation). University of Lisbon, Portugal.2013 ). Dyadic coping, we-ness and relationship satisfaction (manuscript under review).2011). Portuguese. Retrieved from www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=portuguese
. (