Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Review Article

Conceptual Issues and Assessment of Implicit Theories

Published Online:July 28, 2017https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000286

Abstract

Abstract. We reviewed fundamental conceptual issues and the state of research on the definition and assessment of implicit theories. We grappled with the following controversies related to the construct: (a) Are entity theory and incremental theory opposite ends of the same continuum? (b) How can scholars use more sophisticated methodologies to classify individuals into either the entity or incremental theory? (c) Given shifting conceptions of what intelligence is, how can scholars refine the implicit theory of intelligence construct? Given these conceptual issues, we then addressed practical issues related to the assessment of implicit theories. We point to the need for more sophisticated methods such as implicit association tests and the use of virtual environments as more “stealthy” ways to assess the construct.

References

  • Anderson, C. A. (1995). Implicit theories in broad perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 286–290. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D. & Zuiker, S. (2007). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 59–82. doi: 10.1007/s10956-010-9220-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H. & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bråten, I. & Strømsø, H. I. (2004). Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 371–388. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.10.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M. & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701. doi: 10.1037/a0029531 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, J. A. (2012). Implicit theories, epistemic beliefs, and science motivation: A person-centered approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 724–735. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Clarke-Midura, J. & Dede, C. (2010). Assessment, technology, and change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 309–328. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2010.10782553 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cronbach, L. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity”. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177–193. doi: 10.1037/h0044919 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dai, T. & Cromley, J. G. (2014). Changes in implicit theories of ability in biology and dropout from STEM majors: A latent growth curve approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 233–247. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323, 66–69. doi: 10.1126/science.1167311 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dickhäuser, O., Dinger, F. C., Janke, S., Spinath, B. & Steinmayr, R. (2016). A prospective correlational analysis of achievement goals as mediating constructs linking distal motivational dispositions to intrinsic motivation and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.020 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dinger, F. C. & Dickhäuser, O. (2013). Does implicit theory of intelligence cause achievement goals? Evidence from an experimental study. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 38–47. doi: 10.1037/edu0000048 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dupeyrat, C. & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 43–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. The American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. & Hong, Y. (1995a). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. & Hong, Y. (1995b). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 322–333. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_12 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Erdley, C. A., Loomis, C. C., Cain, K. M., Dumas-Hines, F. & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Relations among children’s social goals, implicit personality theories, and responses to social failure. Developmental Psychology, 33, 263–272. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.2.263 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Girard, C., Ecalle, J. & Magnan, A. (2013). Serious games as new educational tools: How effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 207–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00489.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haselhuhn, M. P., Schweitzer, M. E. & Wood, A. M. (2010). How implicit beliefs influence trust recovery. Psychological Science, 21, 645–648. doi: 10.1177/0956797610367752 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M.-S. & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Howell, A. J. & Buro, K. (2009). Implicit beliefs, achievement goals, and procrastination: A mediational analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 151–154. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.08.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449. doi: 10.1037/a0018947 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ketelhut, D. J., Nelson, B., Schifter, C. & Kim, Y. (2013). Improving science assessments by situating them in a virtual environment. Education Sciences, 3, 172–192. doi: 10.3390/educsci3020172 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lüftenegger, M., Kollmayer, M., Bergsmann, E., Jöstl, G., Spiel, C. & Schober, B. (2015). Mathematically gifted students and high achievement: The role of motivation and classroom structure. High Ability Studies, 26, 227–243. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2015.1095075 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lüftenegger, M., Tran, U., Bardach, L., Schober, B. & Spiel, C. (2017). Measuring a mastery goal structure using the TARGET framework: Development and validation of a classroom goal structure questionnaire. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225, 64–75. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000277 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J. & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19–40. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.19 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Malmberg, L.-E. & Little, T. D. (2007). Profiles of ability, effort, and difficulty: Relationships with worldviews, motivation and adjustment. Learning and Instruction, 17, 739–754. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C. & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75–86. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsl013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mascret, N., Roussel, P. & Cury, F. (2015). Using implicit measures to highlight science teachers’ implicit theories of intelligence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30, 269–280. doi: 10.1007/s10212-015-0249-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miele, D. B. & Molden, D. C. (2010). Naive theories of intelligence and the role of processing fluency in perceived comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 535–557. doi: 10.1037/a0019745 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Molden, D. C. & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. The American Psychologist, 61, 192–203. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moser, J. S., Schroder, H. S., Heeter, C., Moran, T. P. & Lee, Y.-H. (2011). Mind your errors evidence for a neural mechanism linking growth mind-set to adaptive posterror adjustments. Psychological Science, 22, 1484–1489. doi: 10.1177/0956797611419520 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nelson, B. C. & Ketelhut, D. J. (2007). Scientific inquiry in educational multi-user virtual environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 265–283. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9048-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peterson, C. (1995). Entity and incremental world views: Some lessons from learned helplessness theory and research. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 307–311. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pomerantz, E. M. & Kempner, S. G. (2013). Mothers’ daily person and process praise: Implications for children’s theory of intelligence and motivation. Developmental Psychology, 49, 2040–2046. doi: 10.1037/a0031840 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., MacCallum, R. C. & Nicewander, W. A. (2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10, 178–192. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.178 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rattan, A., Savani, K., Chugh, D. & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Leveraging mindsets to promote academic achievement: Policy recommendations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 721–726. doi: 10.1177/1745691615599383 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rowe, J. P., Shores, L. R., Mott, B. W. & Lester, J. C. (2010). Integrating learning and engagement in narrative-centered learning environments. In V. AlevenJ. KayJ. MostowEds., Proceedings of the 10th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems – Volume part II (pp. 166–177). Pittsburgh, PA: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_17 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schober, B., Brandt, L., Kollmayer, M. & Spiel, C. (2016). Overcoming the ivory tower: Transfer and societal responsibility as crucial aspects of the Bildung-Psychology approach. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 636–651. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2016.1231061 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schroder, H. S., Moran, T. P., Donnellan, M. B. & Moser, J. S. (2014). Mindset induction effects on cognitive control: A neurobehavioral investigation. Biological Psychology, 103, 27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.08.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schunk, D. H. (1995). Implicit theories and achievement behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 311–314. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spinath, B. & Schöne, C. (2003). Die Skalen zur Erfassung subjektiver Überzeugungen zu Bedingungen von Erfolg in Lern- und Leistungskontexten (SE-SÜBELLKO) [Scales for the assessment of subjective beliefs regarding prerequisites of success in learning and performance contexts]. Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, 15–27. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. In J. Stiensmeier-PelsterF. RheinbergEds., Journal of Personality (pp. 607–627). 49. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stipek, D. & Gralinski, J. H. (1996). Children’s beliefs about intelligence and school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 397–407. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.397 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., Giesbers, B. & Gijselaers, W. H. (2014). The pivotal role of effort beliefs in mediating implicit theories of intelligence and achievement goals and academic motivations. Social Psychology of Education, 18, 101–120. doi: 10.1007/s11218-014-9281-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wegener, D. T. & Petty, R. E. (1998). The naive scientist revisited: Naive theories and social judgment. Social Cognition, 16, 1–7. doi: 10.1521/soco.1998.16.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wesnousky, A. E., Oettingen, G. & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2015). Holding a silver lining theory: When negative attributes heighten performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.11.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yeager, D. S. & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302–314. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.722805 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., … Dweck, C. S. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 374–391. doi: 10.1037/edu0000098 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yeager, D. S., Walton, G. M., Brady, S. T., Akcinar, E. N., Paunesku, D., Keane, L., … Dweck, C. S. (2016). Teaching a lay theory before college narrows achievement gaps at scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, E3341–E3348. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524360113 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar