Abstract
Two studies tested the influence of accessibility experiences on belief perseverance when participants generated few or many reasons about how a reported outcome or an alternative outcome might have turned out. Those participants who had listed many reasons about the reported outcome rated this outcome after debriefing to be less likely – and hence exhibited no belief perseverance – than participants who had listed few reasons or subjects in a standard perseverance group (Experiment 1). In contrast, participants who had listed many reasons favoring an alternative outcome rated the reported outcome to be more likely and thus showed more belief perseverance than subjects who had listed only few reasons or participants in a standard perseverance condition (Experiment 2). Both effects are interpreted as evidence for the influence of accessibility experiences in the domain of belief perseverance.
References
(1982). Inoculation and counter-explanation: Debiasing techniques in the perseverance of social theories. Social Cognition, 1, 126–139.
(1983). Abstract and concrete data in the perseverance of social theories: When weak data can lead to unshakeable beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 93–108.
(2008). Belief perseverance. In , Encyclopedia of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1986). Effects of explanation and counterexplanation on the development and use of social theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 24–34.
(1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037–1049.
(2008). How many hindsight biases are there? Cognition, 106, 1408–1440.
(1987). Reduction of hindsight bias by restoration of foresight perspective: Effectiveness of foresight-encoding and hindsight-retrieval strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 50–68.
(1997). Belief persistence after evidential discrediting: The impact of generated versus provided explanations on the likelihood of discredited outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 561–578.
(1999). When recollective experiences matter: Subjective ease of retrieval and stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 760–768.
(1975). Hindsight? Foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.
(1979). Information processing and the perseverance of discredited self-perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 201–205.
(2007). Relying in accessible content versus accessibility experiences: The case of processing capacity. Social Cognition, 25, 853–881.
(2002). It’s easy to like or dislike Tony Blair: Accessibility experiences and the favorability of attitude judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 257–267.
(1984). The perseverance of beliefs: Conceptual perspectives and research developments. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 25–56.
(2008a). Hindsight bias and causal attribution: A causal model theory of creeping determinism. Social Psychology, 39, 182–188.
(2008b). Hindsight bias doesn’t always come easy: Causal models, cognitive effort, and creeping determinism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1043–1054.
(1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 880–892.
L. (1977). Social explanation and social expectation: The effects of real and hypothetical explanations upon subjective likelihood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 817–829.
(1997). Differential use of the availability heuristic in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 123–138.
(2003). Debiasing the hindsight bias: The role of accessibility experiences and (mis)attributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 287–295.
(2007). Metacognitive experiences and hindsight bias: It’s not just the thought (content) that counts! Social Cognition, 25, 185–202.
(2002). Accessibility experiences and the hindsight bias: I knew it all along versus it could never have happened. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1288–1296.
(2002). When debiasing backfires: Accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 497–502.
(1998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 87–99.
(2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332–348.
(1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.
(1996). Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1105–1113.
(1997). There are many reasons to drive a BMW: Does imaged ease of argument generation influence attitudes? Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 170–177.
(1995). The availability heuristic revisited: Experienced ease of retrieval in mundane frequency estimates. Acta Psychologica, 89, 83–90.
