The Role of Embodiment and Individual Empathy Levels in Gesture Comprehension
Abstract
Abstract. Research suggests that the action-observation network is involved in both emotional-embodiment (empathy) and action-embodiment (imitation) mechanisms. Here we tested whether empathy modulates action-embodiment, hypothesizing that restricting imitation abilities will impair performance in a hand gesture comprehension task. Moreover, we hypothesized that empathy levels will modulate the imitation restriction effect. One hundred twenty participants with a range of empathy scores performed gesture comprehension under restricted and unrestricted hand conditions. Empathetic participants performed better under the unrestricted compared to the restricted condition, and compared to the low empathy participants. Remarkably however, the latter showed the exactly opposite pattern and performed better under the restricted condition. This pattern was not found in a facial expression recognition task. The selective interaction of embodiment restriction and empathy suggests that empathy modulates the way people employ embodiment in gesture comprehension. We discuss the potential of embodiment-induced therapy to improve empathetic abilities in individuals with low empathy.
References
2010). Mimicry and simulation in gesture comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 433–434. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10001445
(2010). Common premotor regions for the perception and production of prosody and correlations with empathy and prosodic ability. PLoS One, 5, 1–8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008759
(2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175. doi: 10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
(2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Reviews Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
(1999). The Camaleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893
(2013). Is automatic imitation based on goal coding or movement coding? Experimental Psychology, 60, 213–225. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000190
(2015). Modulation of gestural-verbal semantic integration by tDCS. Brain Stimulation, 8, 493–498. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.12.001
(2010). The blame game: the effect of responsibility and social stigma on empathy for pain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 985–997. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21266
(1978). Facial action coding system: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
(1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608–2611.
(2006). Empathy and somatotopic auditory mirror system in humans. Current Biology, 16, 1824–1829. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.072
(2011). Taking your place or matching your face: Two paths to empathic embarrassment. Emotion, 11, 502–513. doi: 10.1037/a0022762
(2013). How the motor-cortex distinguishes among letters, unknown symbols and scribbles. A high density EEG study. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2833–2840. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.014
(2013). Emotional mimicry as social regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 142–157. doi: 10.1177/1088868312472607
(2006). Getting a grip on other minds: Mirror neurons, intention understanding, and cognitive empathy. Social Neuroscience, 1, 175–183. doi: 10.1080/17470910600985605
(2008). The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: Genetic and environmental contributions. Emotion, 8, 737–752. doi: 10.1037/a0014179
(2016). Spontaneous facial mimicry is enhanced by the goal of inferring emotional states: Evidence for moderation of “automatic” mimicry by higher cognitive processes. PLoS One, 11(4). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153128
(1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
(2014). From the heart: Hand over heart as an embodiment of honesty. Cognitive Processing, 15, 237–244. doi: 10.1007/s10339-014-0606-4
(2011). Age differences in three facets of empathy: Performance-based evidence. Psychology and Aging, 26, 60–70. doi: 10.1037/a0021138
(2014). Blocking mimicry makes true and false smiles look the same. PLoS One, 9(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090876
(2011). The neural bases for empathy. The Neuroscientist, 17, 18–24. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090876
(1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A non-obtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.768
(2013). Sensory effects of action observation: Evidence for perceptual enhancement driven by sensory rather than motor simulation. Experimental Psychology, 60, 335–346. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000203
(2013). A novel method testing the ability to imitate composite emotional expressions reveals an association with empathy. PLoS One, 8, e61941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061941
(