Utilities in the 2-4-6 Task
Abstract
The Wason 2-4-6 task was embedded in a practical reasoning scenario where number sequences had well-defined utilities in the process of achieving a goal. Reasoners’ hypothesis-testing behavior was clearly goal-driven and was significantly influenced by whether the utilities favored positive or negative sequences. In the version of the scenario where generating positive sequences had greater benefits than generating negative ones, participants performed poorly at the task as measured by their ability to guess the correct rule and by the nature and number of triples tested before making an announcement. In contrast, the scenario that assigned a greater utility to the production of negative sequences fostered significantly more diligent and creative hypothesis-testing behavior, and participants were significantly more likely to discover the rule. These results suggest that the poor performance observed in Wason’s traditional 2-4-6 task reflects a hypothesis-testing process that by default assigns greater utility to the production of sequences that conform to the initial triple, and hence receive positive feedback. However, reasoners are not averse to producing negative sequences, and understand their implication, if their utility is made relevant in the process of achieving goals.
References
(2005). Generation of hypotheses in Wason’s 2-4-6 task: An information theory approach. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 309–332.
(1993). Reasoning, decision-making, and rationality. Cognition, 49, 165–187.
(1987). Farewell to reason. London, UK: Verso.
(2006). Dual-goal facilitation in Wason’s 2-4-6 task: What mediates successful rule discovery? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 873–885.
(2009). Exploring the determinants of dual goal facilitation in a rule discovery task. Thinking & Reasoning, 15, 294–315.
(1984). A comparison of disconfirmatory, confirmatory and control strategies on Wason’s 2-4-6 task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 629–648.
(1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228.
(1980). Strategies of rule discovery in an inference task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 109–123.
(1995). Inducing a rule in Wason’s 2-4-6 Task: A test of the information-quantity and goal-complementarity hypotheses. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 895–914.
(1998). Rational hypothesis-testing strategies in a rule discovery task. In , Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1079–1083). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2008). Graphical representation fosters discovery in the 2-4-6 task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 625–640.
(2003). Creativity and inductive reasoning: The relationship between divergent thinking and performance on Wason’s 2-4-6 task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 641–655.
(1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140.
