Activation and Persistence of Implicit Causality Information in Spoken Language Comprehension
Abstract
A visual world eye-tracking study investigated the activation and persistence of implicit causality information in spoken language comprehension. We showed that people infer the implicit causality of verbs as soon as they encounter such verbs in discourse, as is predicted by proponents of the immediate focusing account (Greene & McKoon, 1995; Koornneef & Van Berkum, 2006; Van Berkum, Koornneef, Otten, & Nieuwland, 2007). Interestingly, we observed activation of implicit causality information even before people encountered the causal conjunction. However, while implicit causality information was persistent as the discourse unfolded, it did not have a privileged role as a focusing cue immediately at the ambiguous pronoun when people were resolving its antecedent. Instead, our study indicated that implicit causality does not affect all referents to the same extent, rather it interacts with other cues in the discourse, especially when one of the referents is already prominently in focus.
References
(1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419–439.
(2007). Children’s use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 527–565.
(2000). The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eye-tracking. Cognition, 76, B13–B26.
(1986). A verb is worth a thousand words: The causes and consequences of interpersonal events implicit in language. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 104–122.
(2000). Temporal adverbials as segmentation markers in discourse comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 74–87.
(2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.
(1998). Structural parallelism and discourse coherence: A test of centering theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 593–608.
(1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84–107.
(1990). The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 245–264.
(2006). Implicit causality, implicit consequentiality and semantic roles. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 636–648.
(2001). Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 317–367.
(1980). Comprehension of pronouns. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 247–255.
(1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348–368.
(1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In , Attention and performance XII (pp. 559–586). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(1981). Understanding anaphora: Rules used by readers in assigning pronominal referents. Discourse Processes, 4, 323–347.
(2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Hove: Psychology Press.
(2002). Are inferences from stereotyped role names to characters’ gender made elaboratively?. Memory & Cognition, 30, 439–446.
(1996). The locus of implicit causality effects in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 517–543.
(1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 517–543.
(1975). Factors influencing assignments of pronoun antecedents. Cognition, 3, 227–243.
(1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 699–717.
(1998). The representation and processing of coreference in discourse. Cognitive Science, 22, 389–424.
(2000). Language comprehension and probe-list memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 766–775.
(1995). Telling something we can’t know: Experimental approaches to verbs exhibiting implicit causality. Psychological Science, 6, 262–270.
(1978). Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment. Cognition, 6, 117–133.
(2006). How long does it take to find a cause? An online investigation of implicit causality in sentence production. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1535–1555.
(1995). An eye movement analysis of topic-shift effect during repeated reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1365–1373.
(2005). Ambiguous pronoun resolution: Contrasting the first-mention and subject preference accounts. Psychological Science, 16, 260–264.
(2008). Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 709–748.
(2001). Structural case in Finnish. Lingua, 111, 315–376.
(2008). Eye-catching anaphora. Utrecht: LOT International Dissertation Series.
(2006). On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence comprehension: Evidence from self-paced reading and eye tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 445–465.
(2000). Implicit causality and discourse focus: The interaction of text and reader characteristics in pronoun resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 545–570.
(1993). Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 372–380.
(1995). The time-course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 543–566.
(1993). Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1040–1052.
(1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 283–312.
(2007). What are implicit causality and consequentiality?. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 780–788.
(in press). Activating gender stereotypes during online spoken language processing: Evidence from visual world eye-tracking. Experimental Psychology. .
(1993). Accusative marking in Finnish. In , Case and other functional categories in Finnish syntax (pp. 89–109). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(1999). Achieving incremantal semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71, 109–147.
(1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 13, 272–281.
(1994). Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 197–229.
(1994). Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 519–548.
(2000). Interpreting pronouns and connectives: Interactions among focusing, thematic roles and coherence relations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 225–262.
(2000). A simple categorisation model of anaphor resolution. In , Proceedings of the twenty-second annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 930–935). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2000). The time course of the influence of implicit causality information: Focusing versus integration accounts. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 423–443.
(1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
(1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285–318.
(1977). The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 16, 683–692.
(2007). Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective. Brain Research, 1146, 158–171.
(1992). The use of referential expressions in structuring discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 301–333.
