Geometric, Kinetic-Kinematic, and Intentional Constraints Influence Willingness to Pass Under a Barrier
Abstract
Completing a goal directed behavior in a safe and efficient manner requires that a perceiver-actor is sensitive to the various constraints on performing that behavior and adjust his or her movements accordingly. When attempting to pass under a barrier, people adjust their ducking behavior based on the likelihood and potential costs of a collision (van der Meer, 1997). In three experiments, we investigated whether participants are sensitive to geometric (standing height), kinetic-kinematic (anticipated movement speed), and intentional (material properties of the barrier) constraints on passing under a barrier even before attempting to perform this behavior. Although Experiment 1 failed to show that anticipated movement speed influenced perception of whether a barrier could be passed under, Experiment 2 found that this factor influences willingness to attempt the behavior. Experiments 3a and 3b found that the material properties of the barrier itself also influence willingness to attempt the behavior. Together, the results highlight the contribution of geometric, kinetic-kinematic, and intentional constraints to perception.
References
(1992). The human machine: How the body works. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
(1999). Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1076–1096.
(1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2007). Rapid recalibration based on optic flow in visually guided braking. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 61–71.
(1954). The information capacity of the human motor control system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.
(1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
(2006). Locomotion through apertures when wider space for locomotion is necessary: Adaptation to artificially altered body states. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 50–59.
(2001). The theory of event coding: A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.
(1992). Changing affordances in stair climbing: The perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 691–697.
(1998). Determinants of the center of mass trajectory in human walking and running. Journal of Experimental Biology, 201, 2935–2944.
(2008). Kinetic potential influences visual and remote haptic perception of affordances for standing on an inclined surface. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1813–1826.
(1987). Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 361–370.
(2004). A psychological approach to human voluntary movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 355–370.
(2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1996). The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: Perception of catchableness of fly balls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 879–891.
(2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 110–122.
(2003). The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science, 14, 106–112.
(2008). Perception of affordances for standing on an inclined surface depends on height of center of mass. Experimental Brain Research, 191, 25–35.
(1988). Ecological mechanics: A physical geometry for intentional constraints. Human Movement Science, 7, 155–200.
(1999). Ecological foundations of cognition II: Degrees of freedom and conserved quantities in animal-environment systems. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 111–124.
(1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4, 173–187.
(2004). Space and its perception: The first and final frontier. Ecological Psychology, 16, 25–39.
(1997). Visual guidance of passing under a barrier. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 149–157.
(2008). Perception-action as reciprocal, continuous, and prospective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 219–220.
(2007). Perception of whether an object can be carried through an aperture depends on anticipated speed. Experimental Psychology, 54, 54–61.
(2008). Perception of affordances for walking under a barrier from proximal and distal points of observation. Ecological Psychology, 20, 65–83.
(1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 683–703.
(1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 371–383.
(2004). Perceiving distance: A role of effort and intent. Perception, 33, 577–590.
(2005). Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 880–888.
