Risk Perception and Acceptance— One Process or Two?
The Impact of Aspirations on Perceived Risk and Preferences
Abstract
The experiments discussed here are aimed at determining whether risk perception and risk acceptance are two distinct psychological processes. This study is motivated by the idea of a double‐criterion model of choice. In particular, in line with risk‐value (R‐V) models, in which risk is treated as a primitive, it is tested whether risk is independent of aspirations and whether preferences depend on aspirations. In two experiments, 305 university students were presented with pairs of risky projects and were asked to compare their riskiness and select one. The aspiration level, defined as the target return on the project, was set through an explicit instruction. In Experiment 1, a within‐subject design was applied, and thus aspirations were set at two different levels. In Experiment 2, with a between‐subject design, two different aspiration levels were set for each group. The results indicate that risk ordering is insensitive to changes in aspirations, but preferences are sensitive to those changes. This supports distinctness of risk perception and risk acceptance. The findings are discussed in terms of the CPT and SP/A models and the R‐V approach. It appears that double‐criterion models provide better and psychologically sounder predictions of subjects' preferences.
References
(1953/1979). The foundation of a positive theory of choice involving risk and a criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American School. In , Expected utility hypothesis and the Allais paradox. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
(1988). One‐switch utility functions and measures of risk. Management Science, 34, 1416–1424.
(1995a). A contextual uncertainty condition for behavior under risk. Management Science, 41, 1145–1150.
(1995b). Risk, return, and utility. Management Science, 41, 23–30.
(2001). Strong one‐switch utility. Management Science, 47, 601–604.
(1997). Risk as a primitive: A survey of measures of perceived risk. Spektrum, 19, 235–250.
(2005). An empirical investigation of the assumptions of risk‐value models. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 30, 133–156.
(1975). Portfolio theory and the measurement of risk. In , Human judgment and decision process. New York: Academic Press.
(1981). Evaluation of two alternative models of a theory of risk: I. Are moment of distributions useful in assessing risk? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 1110–1123.
(1984). Conjoint design analysis of the bilinear model: An application to judgments of risk. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28, 1–42.
(1990). Prospect theory and the risk‐return association. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 14, 187–203.
(1988). Attitudes toward risk and the risk‐return paradox: Prospect theory explanations. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 85–106.
(1977). Mean‐risk analysis with risk associated below‐target returns. American Economic Review, 67, 116–126.
(1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 79–109.
(1996). A standard measure of risk and risk‐ value models. Management Science, 42, 1691–1705.
(1999). Measures of perceived risk. Management Science, 45, 519–532.
(2004). Beyond a trait view of risk taking: A domain‐specific scale measuring risk perceptions, expected benefits, and perceived‐risk attitudes in German‐speaking populations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35, 153–163.
(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
(1986). Empirical investigation of some properties of the perceived riskiness of gambles. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Process, 38, 114–130.
(1999). Goal‐induced risk taking in strategy choice. Working paper. University of Chicago Graduate School of Business
(2000). Shifts of reference points for framing of strategic decisions and changing risk‐return association. Management Science, 46, 63–76.
(1984). Risk and distributional inequality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 465–485.
(1987). Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 255–295.
(1990). Re‐modeling risk aversion: A comparison of Bernoullian and rank dependent value approaches. In , Acting under uncertainty: Multidisciplinary conceptions (pp. 267–299). Boston: Kluwer
(1996). When time is of the essence: Averaging, aspiration and the short run. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Process, 65, 179–189.
(1999). The role of aspiration level in risky choice: A comparison of cumulative prospect theory and SP/A theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 43, 286–313.
(1986). An axiomatic theory of conjoint, expected risk. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30, 188–205.
(1987). Managerial perspective on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33, 1404–1418.
(1992). Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psychological Review, 99, 172–183.
(1959). Portfolio Selection. New York: Wiley.
(1997). Do risk attitudes reflect in the eye of the beholder?. In , Choice, decision, and measurement (pp. 57–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
(1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(1975). Relation of perceived risk to preferences among gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 104, 86–94.
(2005). It is whether you win or lose: The importance of the overall probabilities of winning or loosing in risky choice. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 30, 5–19.
(1980). Transaction of gambles and aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Science, 26, 1039–1060.
(1981). Further tests of aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Science, 27, 953–958.
(1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 324–345.
(1993). Risk‐value models. European Journal of Operational Research, 70, 135–149.
(1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.
(2000). Models of risk and choice: Challenge or danger? Acta Psychologica, 104, 339–369.
(1995). Perception and acceptance of technological and environmental hazards. Risk Analysis, 15, 733–743.
(2000). Developments in non‐expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 332–382.
(1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.
(1992). A theory of perceived risk and attractiveness. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 52, 492–523.
(2002). A domain‐ specific risk‐attitude scale: Measuring risk perception and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263–290.
(1990). An empirical test of the transitivity, monotonicity, accounting, and conjoint axioms for perceived risk. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 45, 253–275.
(1998). Cross‐cultural differences in risk perception but cross‐cultural similarities in risk attitudes toward risk. Management Science, 44, 1205–1217.
(1997). Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Science, 43, 122–143.
