Spatial Processing and Perceptual Sequence Learning in SRT Tasks
Abstract
We investigated the influence of processing relevant spatial information on learning a probabilistic sequence of irrelevant locations. Using the SRT design of Remillard (2003), we found that spatial perceptual learning occurs with paired but not with single targets. The pairs of targets consisted of the same stimuli, but in a different order, so that responses could have been based on the left-right location of an element, relative to the other element of the pair. The prerequisite of spatial pairs of targets suggests that spatial processing of relevant information plays a crucial role in perceptual location learning. In addition, spatial perceptual learning only took place when the target pair was presented together with other stimuli, but was absent when the target pair was presented in a blank field. Since in the latter case attention is automatically captured, this suggests that sequence learning requires endogenous attention.
References
(2000). Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 132, 149– 162
(1998). Feature integration and spatial attention: more evidence of a dissociation between endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1243– 1256
(1987). Is Posner’s “beam” the same as Treisman’s “glue”? On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 228– 241
(1998). Implicit learning: news from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406– 416
(1998). Implicit sequence learning: the truth is in details. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.). Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 323-364). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1998). Sequence learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(8), 275– 281
(2002). Negative priming and sequence learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 27– 48
in press Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures. Psychological Research,
(2005). The role of response selection in sequence learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(1998). One concept, multiple meanings. On how to define the concept of implicit learning. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 47-104). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1998). Implicit learning of perceptual and motor sequences: Evidence for independent learning systems. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 401-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2003). Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: evidence for the primacy of response predictions. Psychological Research, 67, 160– 173
(1992). Serial pattern learning by event observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 1029– 1039
(2003). Contextual cueing. Reciprocal influences between attention and implicit learning. In L. Jimenez (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 277-296). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
(1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 236– 259
(1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 350– 364
(1997). Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task. Psychological Research, 60, 98– 112
(1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1– 32
(2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 518– 597
(2001). Implicit learning of first-, second-, and third-order transition probabilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27, 483– 498
(2002). A review of attentional capture: On its automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control. Psicológica, 23, 283– 309
(2002). E-prime, Version 1.1.. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
(1994). Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 163– 196
(2004). Sequence learning and sequential effects. Psychological Research, 69, 124– 137
(2003). The influence of response-effect compatibility in a serial reaction time task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A, 56, 685– 704
(1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97– 136
(1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1047– 1060
(1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 962– 978
(2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 595– 613
