Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Original Article

Measuring Consumers’ Information Acquisition and Decision Behavior With the Computer-Based Information-Display-Matrix

Published Online:January 11, 2011https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000018

Abstract

The former judgment that the process-tracing method information-display-matrix (IDM) lacks external validity should be questioned in the light of technical advances and changing consumer behavior. The new research environment offers possibilities for a close-to-realistic refinement and further development of the method: starting points are choice of location, increased relevance of choice, individual adjustment of task structure, simplified navigation, and realistic layout. Used in multi-measurement-approaches, the IDM can provide detailed background information about consumer information behavior prior to decisions reached in interviews or choice experiments. The contribution introduces to the method and its’ development, use, and (dis-)advantages. Results of a survey illustrate the options for analysis and indicate that consumer behavior in the IDM, compared to face-to-face-interviews, is less biased by social desirability.

References

  • Alfnes, F. , Guttormsen, A. G. , Steine, G. , Kolstad, K. (2006). Consumers’ willingness to pay for the color of salmon: A choice experiment with real economic incentives. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88, 1050–1061. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anderson, P. (2001). P1198. Software for tracing decision behavior in lending to small businesses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33, 234–242. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Andersson, P. (2004). Does experience matter in lending? A process-tracing study on experienced loan officers and novices decision behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 471–492. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bauer, H. H. , Grether, M. , Sattler, C. (2002). Internetspiele als Marketinginstrument für Low-Involvement Produkte. [Online games as a marketing instrument for low-involvement products]. Marketing ZFP, 24, 265–276. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bettman, J. R. , Kakkar, P. (1977). Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 233–241. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Biggs, S. F. , Rosman, A. J. , Sergenian, G. K. (1993). Methodological issues in judgement and decision-making research: Concurrent verbal protocol validity and simultaneous traces of process. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 187–206. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brucks, M. (1988). Search monitor: An approach for computer-controlled experiments involving consumer information search. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 117–121. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Büttner, O. B. , Rauch, M. , & Silberer, G. (2005). Consumer cognition at the point of sale: Results from a process tracing study. Contribution to Tracking Research. No. 11, Institute of Marketing and Retailing, Göttingen, Germany: University of Göttingen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Covey, J. , Lovie, A. (1998). Information selection and utilization in hypothesis testing: A comparison of process-tracing and structural analysis techniques. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 56–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Felser, G. (2007). Werbe- und Konsumentenpsychologie. [Consumer psychology and advertising]. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ford, K. J. , Schmitt, N. , Schechtman, S. L. , Hults, B. M. , Doherty, M. L. (1989). Process tracing methods: contributions, problems, and neglected research questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 75–117. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Harte, J. M. , Koele, P. (1995). A comparison of different methods for the elicitation of attribute weights: Structural modeling, process tracing, and self-reports. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 49–64. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huneke, M. E. , Cole, C. , & Levin, I. P. (2004). How varying levels of knowledge and motivation affect search and confidence during consideration and choice. Marketing Letters, 15, 67–79. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hwang, M. I. , Lin, J. W. (1999). Information dimension, information overload and decision quality. Journal of Information Science, 25, 213–218. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ibanez, M. , Czermak, S. , & Sutter, M. (2008). Searching for a better deal – on the influence of group decision making, time pressure and gender on search behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 1–10. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jacoby, J. , Chestnut, R. W. , Fisher, W. A. (1978). A behavioral process approach to information acquisition in nondurable purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 532–544. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jacoby, J. , Jaccard, J. J. , Currim, I. , Kuß, A. , Ansari, A. , Troutman, T. (1994). Tracing the impact of item-by-item information accessing on uncertainty reduction. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 291–303. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jacoby, J. , Jaccard, J. , Kuß, A. , Troutman, T. , Mazursky, D. (1987). New Directions in behaviorial process research: Implications for social psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 146–175. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jasper, J. , Shapiro, J. ( 2002). Mouse Trace: A better mousetrap for catching decision processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 364–374. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, E. J. (1996). The last whole MouseLab manual. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from www.cebiz.org/mouselab/mouselab.pdf. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, E. , Willemsen, M. C. (2004). MouselabWEB. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from www.mouselabweb.org/index.html. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kleinmuntz, D. N. , Schkade, D. A. (1993). Information displays and decision processes. Psychological Science, 4, 221–227. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kroeber-Riel, W. , Weinberg, P. (2003). Konsumentenverhalten [Consumer behavior]. Munich, Germany: Vahlen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lehmann, D. R. , Moore, W. L. (1980). Validity of information display boards: An assessment using longitudinal data. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 450–459. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Louviere, J. J. , Hensher, D. A. , Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods. Analysis and application. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lusk, J. L. , Schroeder, T. C. (2004). Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 467–482. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marten, U. (1992). Die Bedeutung von Information-Display-Matrices-Verfahren für die Konsumentenforschung [Significance of information display matrix for consumer research]. Dissertation, Bremen, Germany: University of Bremen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, J.-A. (1994). Multimedia in der Werbe- und Konsumentenforschung [Multimedia in advertising and consumer research]. In Forschungsgruppe Konsum und Verhalten (Eds.), Konsumentenforschung (pp. 305–320). Munich, Germany: Gabler. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mittal, B. (1989). Must consumer involvement always imply more information search?. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 167–172. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mühlbacher, S. , Kirchler, E. (2003). Informations-Display-Matrix: Einsatz und Analysemöglichkeiten [Information display matrix: Application and possibilities for analysis]. Der Markt: Zeitschrift für Absatzwirtschaft und Marketing, 42, 147–152. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Newell, B. R. , Weston, N. J. , Shanks, D. R. (2003). Empirical tests of a fast-and-frugal heuristic: Not everyone “takes the best”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 82–96. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366–387. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peterson, R. A. , Merino, M. C. (2003). Consumer information search behavior and the Internet. Psychology & Marketing, 20, 99–121. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ratchford, B. T. , Taludkar, D. , Lee, M.-S. (2007). The impact of the Internet on consumers’ use of information sources for automobiles: A re-inquiry. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 111–119. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roßmanith, T. (2001). Informationsverhalten und Involvement im Internet. Eine Labor- und Feldstudie zu den Determinanten der Informationsnachfrage im World Wide Web [Information acquisition behavior and involvement online. A laboratory and field experiment about the determinants of information search in the World Wide Web]. Dissertation, Karlsruhe, Germany: University of Karlsruhe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scholderer, J. , Hagemann, K. , Sorensen, T. B. , Czienskowski, U. (2007). Consumer use of information about novel foods and food technologies, NOFORISK Deliverable 34, Project Paper No. 01/07. Berlin, Germany: MAPP, Aarhus, Denmark; Max Planck Institute for Human Development. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schopphoven, I. (1996). Messung von Entscheidungsqualität. Konzeptualisierung, Operationalisierung und Validierung eines Meßinstrumentariums für Entscheidungsqualität [Measuring of decision making quality. Conceptualisation, operationalisation, and validation of a measurement]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Silberer, G. (2005). Die videogestützte Rekonstruktion kognitiver Prozesse beim Ladenbesuch [The video-based reconstruction of cognitive processes at the point of sale]. Marketing ZFP, 27, 263–280. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Trommsdorf, V. (2004). Konsumentenverhalten [Consumer behavior]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tutz, G. (2000). Die Analyse kategorialer Daten. Anwendungsorientierte Einführung in Logit-Modellierung und kategoriale Regression [Analysis of categorical data. Application-oriented introduction to logit modeling and categorical regression]. Munich, Germany: Oldenbourg. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Verplanken, B. , Weenig, M. (1993). Graphic energy labels and consumers decisions about home appliances: A process tracing approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 739–752. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weenig, M. , Maarleveld, M. (2002). The impact of time constraint on information search strategies in complex choice tasks. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 689–702. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Williamson, J. , Ranyard, R. , & Cuthbert, L. (2000). A conversation-based process tracing method for use with naturalistic decisions. An evaluation study. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 203–222. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zielke, S. (2001). Kundegerechte Sortimentsgliederung am Point of Sale. Ansätze zur Erhebung kognitiver Strukturen als Richtgrößen für Warenplatzierungen und Category Management [Consumer oriented assortment policy at the point of sale. Approaches for measuring cognitive structures as a guideline for placement and category management]. Marketing ZFP, 23, 100–116. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar