The Study of Professional Writing
A Joint Contribution from Cognitive Psychology and Genetic Criticism
Abstract
In this article, we argue that examining the writing processes of literary authors would enrich and extend empirical research on writing, which is currently grounded in cognitive psychology. In most empirical studies of writing skills, experts are defined as either advanced students or technical writers, neither of whom work within the same constraints or timeframes as literary authors. Including literary authors in psychological accounts of writing, by drawing on the observations of genetic criticism (a linguistic-literary discipline that reconstructs the genesis of an author’s manuscript by collecting and interpreting the notes, drafts, revisions, successive versions, etc.), would add to our knowledge of professional writing. Two issues could then be considered: (a) the way the creative process takes place during writing and (b) the role of memory in the management of writing processes over extended time periods.
References
(2004, September). Approche psycholinguistique de l’écriture [
Psycholinguistic approach of writing ]. Paper presented at the Genetic Criticism Summer School, IMEC, Caen, France.(2001). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
(2005). Pour des approches croisées des écrits techniques au travail [
For a multiperspective approach of technical writing in the workplace ]. In , Production, compréhension et usages des écrits techniques au travail (pp. 1–13). Toulouse, France: Octarès.(2007). Written documents in the workplace. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
(1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295.
(1998). Littératie et rédaction: Vers la définition d’une pratique professionnelle [
Literacy and composition: Toward the definition of a professional practice ]. In , L’intervention: Usages et méthodes (pp. 69–88). Sherbrooke, Canada: Éditions GGC/Université de Sherbrooke.(1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1994). Relations between writing processes and text quality: When and how? Cognition and Instruction, 12, 103–123.
(1986). The variables of composition: Process and product in a business setting. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
(1996). Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 239–297.
(1985). “Capital, Capitalissime,” un mode de composition chez Marcel Proust? [
“Capital, capitalism,” a composition mode of Marcel Proust? ]. In , Leçons d’écriture. Ce que disent les manuscrits (pp. 79–90). Paris: Minard.(1995). A cognitive theory of style. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22, 461–474.
(1993). The generation effect in reading and proof-reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 297–313.
(2000). La génétique des textes [
Textual genetics ]. Paris: Nathan.(2008). Les six grandes étapes de la recherche en génétique des textes [
The six major steps involved in research in textual genetics ]. In , L’édition du manuscrit. De l’archive de création au scriptorium électronique (pp. 25–46). Louvain la Neuve, Belgium: Bruylant Academia.(1981). Writing with power. New York: Oxford University Press.
(1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.
(2000). L’Ecriture et ses doubles. Genèse et variation textuelle [
Writing and its doubles. Genesis and textual variation ]. Paris: CNRS Editions.(1980). The dynamic of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In , Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1989). Planning in writing: The cognition of a constructive process (Tech. report no. 34). Berkeley, CA and Pittsburgh, PA: Center for the Study of Language.
(1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In , Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 139–160). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
(2002). L’analyse des fonctionnements cognitifs: Un support à l’amélioration de la conception des documents procéduraux [
Analyzing cognitive functions as a way to enhance the conception of procedural documents ]. Psychologie Française, 47(1), 41–42.(1978). Writing, dictating, and speaking letters. Science, 201, 1145–1147.
(1994). Éléments de critique génétique [
Elements of genetic criticism ]. Paris: PUF.(2002). Langage de l’ébauche: Parole intérieure extériorisée [
The language of Zola’s drafts: Externalized inner speech ]. Langages, 147, 19–38.(1991). Flaubert: “Ruminer Herodias.” Du cognitif-visuel au verbal-textuel [
Flaubert: “Ruminating on Herodias.” From cognitive-visual to verbal-textual ]. In , L’écriture et ses doubles. Genèse et variation textuelle (pp. 27–109). Paris: CNRS Editions.(1997). Échos et reflets. L’ébauche de La Bête Humaine de Zola [
Echoes and reflections. The draft of La Bête Humaine by Zola ]. Poétique, 109, 3–16.(1993). Les manuscrits des écrivains [
The manuscripts of authors ]. Paris: CNRS Editions.(2002). La littérature des écrivains. Questions de critique génétique [
The literature of authors. Questions of genetic criticism ]. Paris: Corti.(1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In , The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In , Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In , The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 29–55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2003). La question du style [
The question of style ]. In , L’analyse du discours dans les études littéraires (pp. 333–339). Toulouse, France: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.(2005). Le style en mouvement. Littérature et art [
Style in movement: Literature and art ]. Paris: Belin.(
in press ). Genèse et style [Genesis and style ]. Genesis.(2002). La production de textes techniques écrits [
The composition of written technical documents ]. In , Production du langage: Traité des sciences cognitives (pp. 229–249). Paris: Hermès-Science.(1987). Writing performance: Effects of cognitive strategies. Written Communication, 4, 269–298.
(1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 355–365.
(1990). Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 327–342.
(1999). Components of working memory in text production. In , The cognitive demands of writing (pp. 25–42). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
(1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(1987). Le jeu de l’énonciation en allemand d’après les variantes manuscrites des brouillons de H. Heine [
The interplay of enunciation in German, studied on the basis of the handwritten variants in Heine’s drafts ]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Paris IV, France.(1989). Les proto-termes dans les variantes d’écriture [
Proto-words in writing variants ]. DRLAV (Département de recherches linguistiques à Vincennes), 40, 89–113.(2002). La critique génétique et l’étude des processus d’écriture littéraire [
Genetic criticism and the study of literary writing processes ]. In , Production du langage (pp. 251–262). Paris: Hermès Lavoisier.(1996). Writing signatures. In , The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 149–161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1979). Programme et préconstruit génétiques: Le dossier de L’Assommoir [
Genetic programming and genetic preconstructs: The manuscripts of L’Assommoir ]. In , Essais de critique génétique (pp. 193–226). Paris: Flammarion.(1999). Designing medication instructions for older adults. In , Processing of medical information in aging patients (pp. 249–265). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1997). Dynamics in document design. New York: Wiley.
(1999). Representations in writing: A modularity perspective. In , Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 173–190). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
(1989). Cognitive processes in journalistic genres. Written Communication, 6, 390–407.
(2001). The life of Henry Brulard. New York, NY: NYRB Classics. (Original work published 1890).
(1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385–398.
(2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1–25.
(1996). Studying “real life” writing processes: A proposal and an example. In , The science of writing. Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 309–322). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1980). Specific thoughts on the writing process. In , Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 129–137). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1974). Heinrich Heines Arbeitsweise. Kreativität der Veränderung [
How Heinrich Heine worked or the creativity of changing ]. Hamburg, Germany: Hoffmann und Campe.(1982). Some factors determining when instructions will be read. Ergonomics, 25, 225–237.
