The Effect of Retest Practice on the Speed-Ability Relationship
Abstract
Effects of four retest-practice sessions separated by 2 h intervals on the relationship between general intelligence and four reaction time tasks (two memory tests: Sternberg's memory scanning, Posner's letter comparison; and two attention tests: continuous attention, attention switching) were examined in a sample of 83 male participants. Reaction times on all tasks were shortened significantly. The effects were most pronounced with respect to the Posner paradigm and smallest with respect to the Sternberg paradigm. The relationship to general intelligence changed after practice for two reaction time tasks. It increased to significance for continuous attention and decreased for the Posner paradigm. These results indicate that the relationship between psychometric intelligence and elementary cognitive tasks depends on the ability of skill acquisition. In the search for the cognitive roots of intelligence the concept of learning seems to be of importance.
References
1986). Individual differences in information processing: An investigation of intellectual abilities and task performance during practice.. Intelligence, 10, 101– 139.
(1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives.. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 3– 27.
(1988). Determinants of individual difference during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288– 318.
(1989). Within-task intercorrelation of skilled performance: Implication for predicting individual difference? (A comment on Henry & Hulin, 1987).. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 360– 364.
(2000). A reappraisal of the ability determinants of individual differences in skilled performance.. Psychologische Beiträge, 42, 147– 160.
(2002). Ability and task constraint determinants of complex task performance.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 194– 208.
(1996). A taxonomic study of perceptual speed abilities. . Paper presented at the 1996 Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL..
(1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill.. Psychological Review, 89, 369– 406.
(1993). Human cognitive abilities. . New York: Cambridge University Press..
(1995). Attention and intelligence: The validity of the Star Counting Test.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 80– 92.
(1983). Leistungsprüfsystem ‘Performance test system’.. Göttingen: Hogrefe..
(1983). Is speed of information processing related to fluid or crystallized intelligence?. Intelligence, 7, 91– 106.
(1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657– 690.
(1990). A basic information psychological parameter (BIP) for the reconstruction of concepts of intelligence.. European Journal of Personality, 4, 259– 286.
(1987). Speed of information processing and level of cognitive ability.. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 599– 607.
(1996). The attentive mind: Intelligence in relation to selective attention, sustained attention, and dual task performance.. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 27, 3– 24.
(1994). Reaction times in a sentence-picture verification test and intelligence: Individual strategies and effects of extended practice.. Intelligence, 19, 193– 218.
(1997). Intelligence and reaction times in the Hick, Sternberg, and Posner paradigms.. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 885– 894.
(1967). Chronometric analysis of classification.. Psychological Review, 74, 392– 409.
(1989). How does very prolonged practice improve decision speed?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 338– 345.
(1994). Age, information processing speed, and intelligence.. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 741– 760.
(2001). There are stable individual differences in performance variability, both from moment to moment and from day to day.. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 981– 1003.
(2001). The contributions of memory and attention processes to cognitive abilities.. The Journal of General Psychology, 128, 30– 42.
(1991). On the replicability of the relation between reaction time components and intelligence.. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 857– 864.
(1993). Verbal ability and speed of information-processing.. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 645– 652.
(1994). Structural diversity of the speed-ability relationship due to information-processing skills.. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 607– 616.
(2000). Sustained attention, intelligence, and the crucial role of perceptual processes.. Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 271– 287.
(1991). The effects of training and practice on human abilities.. In H.A.H. Rowe (Ed.), Intelligence: Reconceptualization and measurement (pp. 97-117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum..
(1997). Mental speed is not the “basic” process of intelligence.. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 69– 84.
(1994). Attention and speed of test-taking in intelligence and aging.. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 273– 284.
(1966). High-speed scanning in human memory.. Science, 153, 652– 654.
(1975). Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies.. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 1– 32.
(1961). The effect of shift of sensory modality on serial reaction time: A comparison of schizophrenics and normals.. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 224– 232.
(1966). Effects of alcohol on performance in continuous attention tasks.. Psychosomatic Medicine, 4, 596– 604.
(1941). Factorial studies of intelligence. . Psychometric Monographs, 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press..
(1984). Individual and group differences in intelligence and speed of information processing.. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 411– 423.
(1986). Reaction time correlations with intelligence test scores obtained under either timed or untimed conditions.. Intelligence, 10, 315– 330.
(1984). Effects of scopolamine and nicotine on human information processing performance.. Psychopharmacology, 82, 147– 150.
(