Skip to main content
Original Article

Broad Motives in Short Scales

A Questionnaire for the Zurich Model of Social Motivation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.25.3.141

We introduce a new questionnaire that measures interindividual differences in five motivational systems (security, arousal, power, prestige, and achievement) with six items per scale. As a theoretical base for our work we referred to the Zurich model of social motivation, which describes and models these motivational systems in a system-theoretic way. The questionnaire is formulated in German and called Motive Profile Following the Zurich Model (MPZM). Data indicate that the questionnaire shows good psychometric properties with Cronbach’s α > 0.73 and an excellent factorial structure (n = 1,243). To assess convergent and discriminant validity, the MPZM was compared with the Personality Research Form (PRF-D), the Multimotive Grid (MMG) and the NEO-FFI in a multitrait-multimethod analysis and a scale-level factor analysis (n = 190). The MPZM showed convergent validity to content-matched scales of the PRF (r = 0.55), no differentiated relationship to the MMG, and few correlations to the NEO-FFI. First indications of external validity were studied through biographical data. MPZM was able to predict them with adjusted multiple Rs of up to r = 0.40 and outperformed both the NEO-FFI and MMG in predictive power and incremental validity.

References

  • Asendorpf, J.B. (2000). Idiographische und nomothetische Ansätze in der Psychologie [Ideographic and nomothetic approaches in psychology]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 208, 72–90. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J.B. (2004). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit [The psychology of personality] (3. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bischof, N. (1975). A systems approach toward the functional connections of attachment and fear. Child Development, 46, 801–817. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bischof, N. (1993). Untersuchungen zur Systemanalyse der sozialen Motivation I: Die Regulation der sozialen Distanz – Von der Feldtheorie zur Systemtheorie [On the regulation of social distance – From field theory to systems theory]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 201, 5–43. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bischof, N. (2001). Das Rätsel Ödipus. Die biologischen Wurzeln des Urkonflikts von Intimität und Autonomie [The riddle of Oedipus: The biological roots fo the core conflict between intimacy and autonomy]. München: Piper. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Block, J. (2002). Personality as an affect-processing system: Toward an integrative theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borkenau, P. , Ostendorf, F. (1991). Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung fünf robuster Persönlichkeitsfaktoren [A questionnaire for assessing five robust personality factors]. Diagnostica, 37(1), 29–41. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss. New York: Basic Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, D.T. , Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diamond, L.M. (2004). Emerging perspectives on distinctions between romantic love and sexual desire. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 116–119. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gubler, H. , Bischof, N. (1991). A systems theory perspective. In M.E. Lamb, H. Keller, (Eds.), Infant development: Perspectives from German-speaking countries (pp. 35–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gubler, H. , Bischof, N. (1993). Untersuchungen zur Systemanalyse der sozialen Motivation II: Computerspiele als Werkzeug der motivationspsychologischen Grundlagenforschung [Computer games as a tool for basic research on motivation]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 201, 287–315. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hazan, C. , Shaver, P.R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 1–22. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor-analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, D.N. (1967). Manual for the personality research form. Goshen: Research Psychologist Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Körner, A. , Geyer, M. , Brähler, E. (2002). Das NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI): Validierung anhand einer deutschen Bevölkerungsstichprobe [German validation of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory]. Diagnostica, 48, 19–27. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Lamb, M.E. , Bornstein, M.H. , Teti, D.M. (2002). Development in infancy: An introduction (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lamb, M.E. , Keller, H. (1991). Infant development: Perspectives from German-speaking countries. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McClelland, D.C. , Koestner, R. , Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murray, H.A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Murray, H.A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pollak, S.D. (2005). Early adversity and mechanisms of plasticity: Integrating affective neuroscience with developmental approaches to psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 735–752. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmalt, H.-D. , Sokolowski, K. , Langens, T. (2000). Das Multi-Motiv-Gitter für Anschluß, Leistung und Macht (MMG): Manual [The Multi-Motive-Grid for affiliation, achievement, and power (MMG): Manual]. Frankfurt am Main: Swets & Zeitlinger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schultheiss, O.C. (2001). An information processing account of implicit motive arousal. In M.L. Maehr, P. Pintrich, (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol.12: New directions in measures and methods) (pp. 1–41). Greenwich, CT: JAI. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sokolowski, K. , Schmalt, H.-D. , Langens, T.A. , Puca, R.M. (2000). Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: The Multi-Motive Grid (MMG). Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 126–145. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stumpf, H. , Angleitner, A. , Wieck, T. , Jackson, D.N. , Beloch-Till, H. (1985). Deutsche Personality Research Form (PRF): Handanweisung [German Personality Research Form (PRF): Manual]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Winter, D.G. , John, O.P. , Stewart, A.J. , Klohnen, E.C. , Duncan, L.E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230–250. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar