Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.3.174

This study examines interviewers’ sensitivity to impression management in structured interviews by determining the relative importance that interviewers attach to (verbal and nonverbal) impression management as compared to the relative importance that they attach to predetermined competencies. Two samples of interviewers (55 Master I/O psychology students and 18 professional interviewers) watched and evaluated videotaped interviewees who were instructed to put their best foot forward. Results of relative weight analyses showed that the importance of verbal and nonverbal impression management tactics was relatively small as compared to the importance attached to job-related competencies. The type of interview format had some effect on interviewers’ sensitivity to impression management tactics. In particular, in behavior description interviews the interviewers in both samples attached most relative weight to self-focused verbal tactics. Interviewer experience was not related to interviewers’ sensitivity to impression management tactics.

References

  • Barr, S.H. , Hitt, M.A. (1986). A comparison of selection decision models in manager versus student samples. Personnel Psychology, 39, 599–617. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Camerer, C.F. , Johnson, E.J. (1991). The process-performance paradox in expert judgment: How can the experts know so much and predict so badly? In K.A. Ericsson, J. Smith, (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 195–217). New York: Cambridge Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Campion, M.A. , Palmer, D.K. , Campion, J.E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655–702. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dipboye, R.L. (1992). Social interaction in the interview. In R.L. Dipboye, (Ed.), Selection interview: Process perspective (pp. 75–100). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dipboye, R.L. , Jackson, S.L. (1999). Interviewer experience and expertise effects. In R.W. Eder, M.M. Harris, (Eds.), The employment interview handbook (pp. 259–278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellis, A.P.J. , West, B.J. , Ryan, A.M. , DeShon, R.P. (2002). The use of impression management tactics in structured interviews: A function of question type. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1200–1208. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fletcher, C. (1989). Impression management in the selection interview. In R.A. Giacalone, P. Rosenfeld, (Eds.), Impression management in the organization (pp. 269–281). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fletcher, C. (1990). The relationship between candidate personality, self-presentation strategies, and interviewer assessments in selection interviews: An empirical study. Human Relations, 43, 739–749. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graves, L.M. , Karren, R.J. (1992). Interviewer decision processes and effectiveness: An experimental policy-capturing investigation. Personnel Psychology, 45, 313–340. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, C.A. , Judge, T.A. (2004). The effect of applicant influence tactics on recruiter perceptions of fit and hiring recommendations: A field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 622–632. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Howard, J.L. , Ferris, G.R. (1996). The employment interview context: Social and situational influences on interviewer decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 81, 112–136. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577–580. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, J.W. (2004). Factors affecting relative weights: The influence of sampling and measurement error. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 283–299. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, J.W. , LeBreton, J.M. (2004). History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 238–257. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kacmar, K.M. , Delery, J.E. , Ferris, G.R. (1992). Differential effectiveness of applicant impression management tactics on employment interview decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1250–1272. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klehe, U.C. , Latham, G. (2005). The predictive and incremental validity of the situational and patterned behavior description interviews for team playing behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 108–115. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kristof-Brown, A. , Barrick, M.R. , Franke, M. (2002). Applicant impression management: Dispositional influences and consequences for recruiter perceptions of fit and similarity. Journal of Management, 28, 27–46. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Latham, G.P. , Saari, L.M. , Pursell, M.A. , Campion, M.A. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422–427. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lim, G.S. , Ryan, A.M. (2002). Interviewer susceptibility to applicant impression management tactics in the employment interview: A review and research agenda. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Macan, T.H. , Dipboye, R.L. (1988). The effects of interviewers’ initial impressions on information gathering. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 364–387. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marlowe, C.M. , Schneider, S.L. , Nelson, C.E. (1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased? Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 11–21. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McFarland, L.A. , Ryan, A.M. , Kriska, S.D. (2003). Impression management use and effectiveness across assessment methods. Journal of Management, 29, 641–661. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Medin, D.L. , Goldstone, R.L. , Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254–278. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oswald, F.L. , Schmitt, N. , Kim, B.H. , Ramsay, L.J. , Gillespie, M.A. (2004). Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 187–207. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peeters, H. , Lievens, F. (2006). Verbal and nonverbal impression management tactics in behavior description and situational interviews. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 206–222. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raza, S.M. , Carpenter, B.N. (1987). A model of hiring decisions in real employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 596–603. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rotundo, M. , Sackett, P.R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sacco, S.M. , Scheu, C.R. , Ryan, A.M. , Schmitt, N. (2003). An investigation of race and sex similarity effects in interviews: A multilevel approach to relational demography. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 852–865. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schenkler, B.R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, D.J. (1981). Tactical self-presentations: Toward a broader conception. In J.T. Tedeschi, (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological research (pp. 23–40). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Silvester, J. , Anderson-Gough, F.M. , Anderson, N.R. , Mohammed, A.R. (2002). Locus of control, attributions and impression management in the selection interview. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 59–76. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stevens, C.K. , Kristof, A.L. (1995). Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 587–606. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tedeschi, J.T. , Melburg, V. (1984). Impression management and influence in the organization. In S. Bacharach, E.J. Lawler, (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 3, pp. 31–58). Greenwich, CT: JAI. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tsai, W.C. , Chen, C.C. , Chiu, S.F. (2005). Exploring boundaries of the effects of applicant impression management tactics in job interviews. Journal of Management, 31, 108–125. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wayne, S.J. , Liden, R.C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 232–260. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar