Effects of Practice and Intellectual Growth on Performance on the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test (SweSAT)
Abstract
Summary: The purpose of the study is to examine effects of repeated test taking over several sessions on the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test (SweSAT). Self-selection effects on test performance due to background variables that must be taken into consideration are also investigated. All test repeaters with two and three test scores from three cohorts are included in the study. By using different regression models a distinction can be made between the effects of practice as a function of test-taking experience, and the effects of growth as a function of time. The results show self-selection effects due to age and grades, such that students with higher grades tend to be younger when taking the first test. Furthermore, this phenomenon tends to be more accentuated with repeated test takings. It is also shown that there are score gains as a function of practice at the first testing session, and that there are also effects of growth on the SweSAT performance. The magnitude of score gains associated with growth is equal over the two intervals measured, but different between the three cohorts. There are reasons to assume that effects of schooling may explain these differences. An additional explanation may be that the younger students have a greater potential for growth.
References
Andersson, K. Ed. (1999). Högskoleprovet - Konstruktion, resultat och erfarenheter ‘The Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test - Construction, results, and experiences’ (Pm 153).. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå Universitet, Department of Education.Bond, L. (1989). The effects of special preparation on measures of scholastic ability.. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp.429-444). New York: Macmillan.Cahan, S., Cohen, N. (1989). Age versus schooling effects on intelligence development.. Child Development, 60, 1239– 1249Cole, N. (1982). The implications of coaching for ability testing.. In A.K. Widgor & W.R. Garner (Eds.), Ability testing: Uses, consequences, and controversies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Donlon, T.F. Ed. (). The college board technical handbook for the scholastic aptitude test and achievement tests. . New York: College Entrance Examination Board.Gustafsson, J.-E. (in press). Schooling and intelligence: Effects of track of study on level and profile of cognitive abilities. . To be included in a volume based on paper presented at the Spearman Conference, Sidney, 2001.Gustafsson, J.-E., Benjegård, M. (1996). Högskoleprovet, social bakgrund och upprepad provtagning ‘The Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test, social background and repeated test taking’.. In Högskoleverket, Högskoleprovet. Genom elva forskares ögon ‘The SweSAT. Through the eyes of eleven researchers’ (Rapport 1996:22R, pp.42-49). Stockholm: National Agency for Higher Education.Henriksson, W. (1985). Effekter av övning och instruktion på testprestation ‘The effects of practice and coaching on test results’.. In W. Henriksson, S. Henrysson, C. Stage & I. Wedman (Eds.), Prov för urval till högskolan ‘Test for selection to university’. SOU 1985: 57.Henriksson, W., Henriksson, S. (1991). Effekter av upprepad provtagning ‘Effects of repeated test taking’ (Pm 40).. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, Department of Education.Henriksson, W. (1993). The problem of repeated test taking and the SweSAT (Em 5). . Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, Department of Education, Division of Educational Measurement.Henriksson, W. (1995). Repeated test taking and the SweSAT (Pm 13). . Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, Department of Education.Henriksson, W., Bränberg, K. (1992). Effekten av upprepat provtagande. En studie av poängförändringar från första till andra provgenomförandet ‘The effect of repeated test taking. A study of score chances from the first to the second test session’ (Pm 70).. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, Department of Education.Henriksson, W., Bränberg, K. (1994). The effects of practice on the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test (SweSAT).. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 38, 129– 148Högskoleverket (2002). The Swedish national aptitude test: A 25-Years testing program - current status and future development (Report Series 2002:22R). . Stockholm: National Agency for Higher Education.McArdle, J.J., Woodcock, R.W. (1997). Expanding test-retest designs to include development time-lag components.. Psychological Methods, 2, 403– 435Messick, S. (1980). The effectiveness of coaching for the SAT: A review and analysis of research from the fifties to the FTC (Research Report No.80-8).. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Messick, S., Jungeblut, A. (1981). Time and method in coaching for the SAT.. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 191– 216Powers, D.E., Rock, D.A. (1999). Effects of coaching on SAT I: Reasoning test scores.. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 93– 118Stage, C., Ögren, G. (2001). Högskoleprovets utveckling under åren 1977-2000. Provets sammansättning och provdeltagargruppens sammansättning och resultat ‘The development of the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test in the years 1977-2000. The characteristics of the test and the characteristics of the testees and their SweSAT scores’ (Pm 169).. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, Department of Education.
