Skip to main content
Originalia

Entwicklung, Validierung und Normierung des Rasch-basierten Depressionsscreenings

Eine Übersicht

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000116

Zusammenfassung.Theoretischer Hintergrund: Vor dem Hintergrund hoher Prävalenzraten für depressive Störungen bei somatisch Erkrankten sowie artifizieller Effekte bei wiederholten Messungen wurde das Rasch-basierte Depressionsscreening (DESC) entwickelt. Fragestellung: Der Entwicklungs-, Validierungs- und Normierungsprozess des Verfahrens wird zusammengefasst und die Nützlichkeit für die klinische Praxis diskutiert. Methoden: Ausgehend von der Aachener Depressionsitembank (Forkmann et al., 2009) wurde das DESC anhand von N = 333 psychisch/somatisch erkrankten Patienten (Alter M = 43,6 Jahre; 46,2% Frauen) mittels Strukturmodellierung und Rasch-Analyse entwickelt, an verschiedenen klinischen Stichproben überprüft und bevölkerungsrepräsentativ normiert (N = 2 .509). Ergebnisse: Eindimensionalität und Rasch-Modellkonformität der Parallelformen wurden bestätigt und Cut-Off-Werte mit guter Sensitivität und Spezifität bestimmt. Die Paralleltestreliabilität war in allen Stichproben >0.9. Schlussfolgerungen: Mit dem DESC steht ein neues Verfahren mit guten psychometrischen Eigenschaften zur Verfügung, das das Instrumentarium zur Depressionsdiagnostik sinnvoll ergänzt.


Development validation and norm values of the Rasch-based Depression Screening. An overview

Abstract.Background: In the light of high prevalence for depressive disorders in patients with somatic disorders and artificial retest-effects the Rasch-based Depressionscreening (DESC) was developed. Objective: To report the DESC’s development, validation and determination of norm values and to discuss its implications for clinical practice. Methods: Based on the Aachen Depression Item Bank the DESC was developed using data from N = 333 patients with mental/somatic disorders (age M = 43.6; 46.2% women) applying structural equation modelling and Rasch analysis. It was further evaluated using clinical samples. Results: Results confirmed unidimensionality and adherence to the Rasch model. Sensitivity and specificity was good. Parallel test reliability was >0.9 in all samples. Conclusions: The DESC is a new self-report instrument with good psychometric characteristics that amends the available tools for depression diagnostics.

Literatur

  • Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2004). Can somatic symptoms predict depression? Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 657–666. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alexopoulos, G. S. , Borson, S. , Cuthbert, B. N. , Devanand, D. P. , Mulsant, B. H. , Olin, J. T. et al. (2002). Assessment of late life depression. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 164–174. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2005). Amos (Version 6.0) [Computer software]. Chicago: Small Waters. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bagozzi, R. , Baumgartner, H. (1994). The evaluation of structural equation models and hypothesis testing. In R. Bagozzi (Ed.), Principles of Marketing Research (pp. 386–422). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baumgartner, H. , Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 139–161. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bond, T. G. , Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bonilla, J. , Bernal, G. , Santos, A. , Santos, D. (2004). A revised Spanish version of the Beck Depression Inventory: psychometric properties with a Puerto Rican sample of college students. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 119–130. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boomsma, A. (2000). Reporting analysis of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 461–483. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cameron, I. M. , Crawford, J. R. , Lawton, K. & Reid, I. C. (2008). Psychometric comparison of PHQ-9 and HADS for measuring depression severity in primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 58, 32–36. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chandra, R. K. , Epstein, V. A. , Fishman, A. J. (2009). Prevalence of depression and antidepressant use in an otolaryngology patient population. Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 141, 136–138. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Choquette, K. A. , Hesselbrock, M. N. (1987). Effects of retesting with the Beck and Zung depression scales in alcoholics. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 22, 277–283. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cole, J. C. , Smith, T. L. , Rabin, A. S. , Kaufmann, A. S. (2004). Development and Validation of a Rasch-Derived CES-D Short Form. Psychological Assessment, 16, 360–372. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Bonis, M. , Lebeaux, M. O. , de Boeck, P. , Simon, M. & Pichot, P. (1991). Measuring the severity of depression through a self-report inventory. A comparison of logistic, factorial and implicit models. Journal of Affective Disorders, 22, 55–64. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Derogatis, L. R. (1993). The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring and procedures manual (3rd ed.) Mineapolis, MN: National Computer System. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Embretson, S. E. , Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Forjaz, M. J. , Rodriguez-Blazquez, C. , Martinez-Martin, P. (2009). Rasch analysis of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 24, 526–532. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forkmann, T. , Boecker, M. , Norra, C. , Eberle, N. , Kircher, T. , Schauerte, P. et al. (2009a). Development of an item bank for the assessment of depression in persons with mental illnesses and physical diseases using Rasch analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54, 186–197. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forkmann, T. , Boecker, M. , Wirtz, M. , Eberle, N. , Westhofen, M. , Schauerte, P. et al. (2009b). Development and validation of the Rasch-based depression screening (DESC) using Rasch analysis and structural equation modelling. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40, 468–478. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forkmann, T. , Boecker, M. , Wirtz, M. , Glaesmer, H. , Brahler, E. , Norra, C. et al. (2010a). Validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening in a large scale German general population sample. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 105. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forkmann, T. , Norra, C. , Wirtz, M. , Gauggel, S. & Boecker, M. (2010b). Psychometric evaluation of the Rasch-based depression screening in patients with neurologic disorders. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 1188–1193. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gauggel, S. , Böcker, M. , Heinemann, A. W. , Lämmler, G. , Borchelt, M. , Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. (2004). Patient-Staff Agreement on Barthel Index Scores at Admission and Discharge in a Sample of Elderly Stroke Patients. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49, 21–27. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gauggel, S. , Schmidt, A. , Didié, M. (1994). Körperliche Beschwerden und deren Einfluss auf die Erfassung depressiver Störungen bei jüngeren und älteren Menschen. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie und Gerontopsychiatrie, 7, 203–210. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hair, J. F. , Anderson, R. E. , Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (2004). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hautzinger, M. , Bailer, M. (1993). Allgemeine Depressionsskala: ADS. Göttingen: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hautzinger, M. , Keller, F. , Kühner, C. (2006). Beck Depressions-Inventar Revision: Manual. Frankfurt am Main: Harcourt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Herrmann, C. , Buss, U. , Snaith, R. P. (1995). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Deutsche Version (HADS-D). Manual. Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hiller, W. , Zaudiga, M. , Mombour, W. (1999). ICD International Diagnostic Checklists for ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber Pub. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobson, N. S. , Roberts, L. J. , Berns, S. B. , McGlinchey, J. B. (1999). Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: description, application, and alternatives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 300–307. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobson, N. S. , Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kendel, F. , Wirtz, M. , Dunkel, A. , Lehmkuhl, E. , Hetzer, R. & Regitz-Zagrosek, V. (2010). Screening for depression: Rasch analysis of the dimensional structure of the PHQ-9 and the HADS-D. Journal of Affective Disorders, 122, 241–246. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.) New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kojima, M. , Furukawa, T. A. , Takahashi, H. , Kawai, M. , Nagaya, T. & Tokudome, S. (2002). Cross-cultural validation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in Japan. Psychiatry Research, 110, 291–299. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kroenke, K. , Spitzer, R. L. , Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kühner, C. (1997). Fragebogen zur Depressionsdiagnostik nach DSM-IV. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leboyer, M. , Slama, F. , Siever, L. , Bellivier, F. (2005). Suicidal disorders: a nosological entity per se? American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 133, 3–7. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Licht, R. W. , Qvitzau, S. , Allerup, P. , Bech, P. (2005). Validation of the Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale and the Hamilton Depression Scale in patients with major depression; is the total score a valid measure of illness severity? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 111, 144–149. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacMahon, K. M. , Lip, G. Y. (2002). Psychological factors in heart failure: a review of the literature. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 509–516. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: a unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schisterman, E. F. , Perkins, N. J. , Liu, A. , Bondell, H. (2005). Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden Index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples. Epidemiology, 16, 73–81. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sharpe, J. P. , Gilbert, D. G. (1998). Effects of repeated administration of the Beck Depression Inventory and other measures of negative mood states. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 457–463. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siegert, R. J. , Tennant, A. , Turner-Stokes, L. (2010). Rasch analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in a neurological rehabilitation sample. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32, 8–17. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simon, G. E. , VonKorff, M. , Piccinelli, M. , Fullerton, C. , Ormel, J. (1999). An international study of the relation between somatic symptoms and depression. The New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 1329–1335. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Storch, E. A. , Roberti, J. W. , Roth, D. A. (2004). Factor structure, concurrent validity, and internal consistency of the Beck Depression Inventory – Second Edition in a sample of college students. Depression & Anxiety, 19, 187–189. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tang, W. K. , Wong, E. , Chiu, H. F. , Lum, C. M. , Ungvari, G. S. (2005). The Geriatric Depression Scale should be shortened: results of Rasch analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 783–789. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vehren, T. , Forkmann, T. , Böcker, M. , Wirtz, M. , Gauggel, S. , & Norra, C. (2009). Ein neues Verfahren zur Depressionsdiagnostik für psychisch und körperlich erkrankte Patienten: Validierung des Rasch-basierten Depressionsscreenings (DESC). DGPPN-Kongress, Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wirtz, M. , Caspar, F. (2002). Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, B. D. , Stone, M. H. (2003). Five Steps to Science: Observing, Scoring, Measuring, Analyzing, and Applying. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 17, 912–913. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zwingmann, C. , Wirtz, M. , Muller, C. , Korber, J. , Murken, S. (2006). Positive and negative religious coping in German breast cancer patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 533–547. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar