Skip to main content
Originalia

Wirksamkeit internetbasierter Programme zum Tabakrauchen

Eine systematische Literaturübersicht

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149/a000052

Zusammenfassung. Ziel dieser systematischen Literaturübersicht ist, die Wirksamkeit internetbasierter Programme zur Förderung des Rauchausstiegs, zur Verhinderung des Raucheinstiegs und zum Schutz vor Passivrauch anhand der vorliegenden empirischen Evidenz zu beurteilen. Die Literatursuche erfolgte im Juli 2010 und umfasste die Datenbanken PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO sowie das Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Randomisiert-kontrollierte Studien, die Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit einer Intervention im Vergleich zu einer Kontrollgruppe oder einer Standardintervention berichten, wurden eingeschlossen. Von 359 Publikationen, die in den Literaturdatenbanken recherchiert wurden, konnten 17 in diese Übersicht eingeschlossen werden. Diese beschrieben 16 Studien: 14 Studien überprüften Programme zur Förderung des Rauchausstiegs, 2 Studien überprüften kombinierte Programme zur Förderung des Ausstiegs und zur Verhinderung des Einstiegs bei Jugendlichen. Von den 14 Rauchausstiegs-Interventionen erwiesen sich sechs als wirksam zur Erhöhung der Rate Rauchabstinenter gegenüber einer Kontrollgruppe. Aufgrund der Heterogenität der Studien v.a. hinsichtlich der verwendeten Kontrollgruppen wurden keine gepoolten Effektgrößen über alle Studien hinweg berechnet. Eine separate Berechnung von Effektgrößen für Studien mit ähnlichen Kontrollgruppen, ergab eine tendenziell, aber nicht signifikant höhere Rate Rauchabstinenter bei Internetinterventionen im Vergleich zu Kontrollgruppen ohne Intervention (Relatives Risiko (RR) 1.42; 95%-Konfidenzintervall (KI) 0.85–2.37). Ein Vergleich der Internetinterventionen mit Kontrollgruppen, die eine Minimalintervention erhielten, ergab einen signifikanten Interventionseffekt (RR 1.31; KI 1.09–1.57). Beim Vergleich der Internetinterventionen mit persönlichen Beratungsinterventionen ergab sich kein signifikanter Interventionseffekt (RR 0.86; KI 0.72–1.04); tendenziell waren die persönlichen Beratungsinterventionen überlegen. Im Vergleich zu einer Standardintervention allein, erwies sich eine Standardintervention mit zusätzlichem Internetprogramm nicht als wirksamer (RR 1.27; KI 0.70–2.31). Interventionen, die ausschließlich aufhörbereite Raucher adressierten, erwiesen sich eher als erfolgversprechend als Interventionen, welche sich an alle Raucher einer bestimmten Population richteten. Die beiden kombinierten Programme zur Förderung des Ausstiegs und zur Verhinderung des Einstiegs bei Jugendlichen waren auf einzelnen, aber nicht allen Zielkriterien wirksam. Zur Förderung des Rauchausstiegs bei aufhörbereiten Rauchern liegen international bereits wirksame Programme vor, allerdings wurde keines dieser Programme im deutschsprachigen Raum überprüft. Die empirische Evidenz zu Internetprogrammen zur Verhinderung des Raucheinstiegs ist bislang sehr gering; Wirksamkeitsstudien zu Internetprogrammen zum Schutz vor Passivrauch liegen bislang keine vor.


Efficacy of Internet programs for tobacco smoking: A systematic review

Abstract. The aim of this study is to systematically review the published literature on the efficacy of Internet programs for smoking cessation, smoking prevention, and prevention of passive smoking. Electronic searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were conducted in July 2010. Randomized controlled trials reporting results about the efficacy of internet interventions for tobacco prevention compared to a control group or a standard intervention were included in the review. Initial searches in the literature databases identified 359 articles, of which 17 were eligible for inclusion in this review. In these articles, 16 studies were described: 14 studies addressed the efficacy of smoking cessation interventions, 2 studies reported results of combined smoking prevention and cessation programs. From the 14 smoking cessation interventions, 6 were effective to increase smoking abstinence rates in comparison to control groups. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, particularly concerning the control groups, we did not pool study results overall. However, we pooled study results and calculated effect sizes for studies with similar control conditions. Compared to control groups without intervention, there was a trend but no statistically significant effect of Internet programs to increase abstinence rates (relative risk (RR) 1.42; 95%-confidence interval (CI) 0.85–2.37). Compared with minimal interventions, online smoking cessation interventions were effective (RR1.31; CI 1.09–1.57). Internet interventions were not effective compared with personal counseling interventions (RR 0.86; CI 0.72–1.04), with a tendency of personal interventions to be more effective. In comparison with a standard intervention, the standard intervention combined with an additional internet program was not more effective (RR 1.27; CI 0.70–2.31). Internet interventions which addressed smokers motivated to quit were more often effective than Internet interventions addressing unselected populations of smokers. The combined smoking prevention and cessation programs were effective on single, but not on all outcome criteria in comparison to assessment only groups. Effective Internet programs exist, particularly for smoking cessation in smokers motivated to quit. However, none of these programs was evaluated in German speaking countries. The empirical evidence for the efficacy of Internet based smoking prevention programs is marginal and, so far, no evidence exists for programs for the prevention of passive smoking.

Literatur

  • An, L. C. , Klatt, C. , Perry, C. L. , Lein, E. B. , Hennrikus, D. J. , Pallonen, U. E. et al. (2008). The RealU online cessation intervention for college smokers: A randomized controlled trial. Preventive Medicine, 47, 194–199. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bala, M. , Strzeszynski, L. , Cahill, K. (2008). Mass media interventions for smoking cessation in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1), CD004704. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brendryen, H. , Drozd, F. , Kraft, P. (2008). A digital smoking cessation program delivered through internet and cell phone without nicotine replacement (happy ending): Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10, e51. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brendryen, H. , Kraft, P. (2008). Happy Ending: A randomized controlled trial of a digital multi-media smoking cessation intervention. Addiction, 103, 478–484. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buller, D. B. , Borland, R. , Woodall, W. G. , Hall, J. R. , Hines, J. M. , Burris-Woodall, P. et al. (2008). Randomized trials on consider this, a tailored, internet-delivered smoking prevention program for adolescents. Health Education and Behavior, 35, 260–281. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bundesamt für Statistik (2009). Tabakbedingte Todesfälle in der Schweiz: Schätzung für die Jahre 1995 bis 2007. Neuchatel: Bundesamt für Statistik. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byron, M. J. , Cobb, N. K. (2009). Concerns about a meta-analysis of computer smoking cessation programs. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169, 1814; author reply 1814–1815. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiore, M. C. (2000). A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence. A US public health service report. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 3244–3254. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grimshaw, G. M. , Stanton, A. (2006). Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4), CD003289. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Japuntich, S. J. , Zehner, M. E. , Smith, S. S. , Jorenby, D. E. , Valdez, J. A. , Fiore, M. C. et al. (2006). Smoking cessation via the internet: A randomized clinical trial of an internet intervention as adjuvant treatment in a smoking cessation intervention. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 8, 59–67. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, U. , Hanke, M. (2001). Tabakrauch-attributable Mortalität in den deutschen Bundesländern. Gesundheitswesen, 63, 363–369. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kreuter, M. W. , Bull, F. C. , Clark, E. M. , Oswald, D. L. (1999). Understanding how people process health information: A comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychology, 18, 487–494. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lancaster, T. , Stead, L. , Silagy, C. , Sowden, A. (2000). Effectiveness of interventions to help people stop smoking: Findings from the Cochrane Library. British Medical Journal, 321, 355–358. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKay, H. G. , Danaher, B. G. , Seeley, J. R. , Lichtenstein, E. , Gau, J. M. (2008). Comparing two web-based smoking cessation programs: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10, e40. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mons, U. (2010). Tabakattributable Mortalität in Deutschland und in den deutschen Bundesländern – Berechnungen mit Daten des Mikrozensus und der Todesursachenstatistik. Gesundheitswesen, DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1252039. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Myung, S. K. , McDonnell, D. D. , Kazinets, G. , Seo, H. G. & Moskowitz, J. M. (2009). Effects of web- and computer-based smoking cessation programs: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169, 929–937. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neubauer, S. , Welte, R. , Beiche, A. , Koenig, H. H. , Buesch, K. & Leidl, R. (2006). Mortality, morbidity and costs attributable to smoking in Germany: Update and a 10-year comparison. Tobacco Control, 15, 464–471. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Noar, S. M. , Benac, C. N. , Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 673–693. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norman, C. D. , Maley, O. , Li, X. Q. , Skinner, H. A. (2008). Using the internet to assist smoking prevention and cessation in schools: A randomized, controlled trial. Health Psychology, 27, 799–810. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oenema, A. , Brug, J. , Dijkstra, A. , de Weerdt, I. , de Vries, H. (2008). Efficacy and use of an internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention, targeting saturated fat intake, physical activity and smoking cessation: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 125–135. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Patten, C. A. , Croghan, I. T. , Meis, T. M. , Decker, P. A. , Pingree, S. , Colligan, R. C. et al. (2006). Randomized clinical trial of an Internet-based versus brief office intervention for adolescent smoking cessation. Patient Education and Counseling, 64, 249–258. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pike, K. J. , Rabius, V. , McAlister, A. , Geiger, A. (2007). American Cancer Society’s QuitLink: Randomized trial of internet assistance. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 9, 415–420. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pisinger, C. , Jørgensen, M. M. , Møller, N. E. , Døssing, M. , Jørgensen, T. (2010). A cluster randomized trial in general practice with referral to a group-based or an internet-based smoking cessation programme. Journal of Public Health, 32, 62–70. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prochaska, J. O. , Butterworth, S. , Redding, C. A. , Burden, V. , Perrin, N. , Leo, M. et al. (2008). Initial efficacy of MI, TTM tailoring and HRI’s with multiple behaviors for employee health promotion. Preventive Medicine, 46, 226–231. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prochaska, J. O. , Velicer, W. F. (1997). The transtheoretical model. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12, 6–7. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rabius, V. , Pike, K. J. , Wiatrek, D. & McAlister, A. L. (2008). Comparing internet assistance for smoking cessation: 13-month follow-up of a six-arm randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10, e45. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schumann, A. , John, U. , Ulbricht, S. , Ruge, J. , Bischof, G. & Meyer, C. (2007). Variability of tailoring of a smoking cessation intervention based on the transtheoretical model. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 3083–3087. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shahab, L. , McEwen, A. (2009). Online support for smoking cessation: A systematic review of the literature. Addiction, 104, 1792–1804. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2009). Statistisches Jahrbuch der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2009. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Strecher, V. J. , Shiffman, S. , West, R. (2005). Randomized controlled trial of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy. Addiction, 100, 682–688. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swan, G. E. , McClure, J. B. , Jack, L. M. , Zbikowski, S. M. , Javitz, H. S. , Catz, S. L. et al. (2010). Behavioral counseling and varenicline treatment for smoking cessation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38, 482–490. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swartz, L. H. , Noell, J. W. , Schroeder, S. W. , Ary, D. V. (2006). A randomised control study of a fully automated internet based smoking cessation programme. Tobacco Control, 15, 7–12. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Te Poel, F. , Bolman, C. , Reubsaet, A. & de Vries, H. (2009). Efficacy of a single computer-tailored e-mail for smoking cessation: Results after 6 months. Health Education Research, 24, 930–940. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walters, S. T. , Wright, J. A. , Shegog, R. (2006). A review of computer and internet-based interventions for smoking behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 264–277. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • World Health Organization (2009). Global Health Risks: Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: World Health Organization. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar