Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Die Skala zur Erfassung der Neigung zu sexueller Belästigung (NSB-Skala), eine Adaptation der Likelihood to Sexually Harass Scale von Pryor (1987), wird vorgestellt. Die Skala enthält vier kritische Szenarien, in denen ein Mann die Möglichkeit hat, eine ihm untergeordnete Frau sexuell zu belästigen. Zwei vorgegebene Verhaltensalternativen je Szenario repräsentieren eine schwere bzw. mildere Form sexueller Belästigung; der Proband gibt jeweils an, mit welcher Wahrscheinlichkeit er sich so verhalten würde. Eine dritte, neutrale Verhaltensalternative zu jedem kritischen Szenario sowie fünf neutrale Füllszenarien dienen dazu, den Untersuchungszweck zu verschleiern. In acht Stichproben mit insgesamt 462 männlichen Versuchspersonen erwies sich die NSB-Skala als ökonomisches, reliables und konstruktvalides Instrument; insbesondere ließ sich aus den NSB-Werten belästigendes Verhalten in realistischen Laborsituationen vorhersagen. Anwendungsgebiete werden diskutiert.
Abstract. A German adaptation of Pryor’s (1987)Likelihood to Sexually Harass Scale, the Skala zur Erfassung der Neigung zu sexueller Belästigung (NSB Scale), is presented. This scale comprises four critical scenarios in which a man has the opportunity to sexually harass a female subordinate. For each scenario, two behavioral alternatives represent severe and moderate forms of sexual harassment, respectively, and the participant indicates his likelihood of engaging in each behavior. One neutral behavioral alternative per critical scenario and five filler scenarios serve to obscure the scale’s purpose. In eight samples totaling 462 male participants the NSB scale showed high efficiency, reliability, and construct validity; in particular, NSB scores predicted harassing behavior in realistic laboratory settings. Areas of application are discussed.
Literatur
(2005). Sexual harassment on the Internet. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 77–92.
(1995). The naive misuse of power: Nonconscious sources of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 85–96.
(1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power -> sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768–781.
(2006). Automatisierte Erfassung sexuell belästigenden Verhaltens im Labor. In , 45. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie: Humane Zukunft gestalten, Nürnberg, 17.–21. September 2006 (S. 26). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
(2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3, 119–126.
(1964). A formal choice form of F scale-free of aquiescent response set. Sociometry, 27, 54–65.
(1997). Evaluative Aspekte sozialer Identität bei Frauen und Männern: Vorstellung einer Skala des Kollektiven Selbstwerts in bezug auf das Geschlecht (KSW-G). Psychologische Beiträge, 39, 322–335.
(1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
(1997). Sexual harassment: An experimental Text of Sex-Role Spillover Theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 63–75.
(1992). Perceptions of sexual harassment in an academic context. Sex Roles, 27, 401–412.
(1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1993). Interpolating 95th percentile eigenvalues from random data: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 585–596.
(1955). The approval motive. New York: Wiley.
(1999). Studying sexual harassment in the laboratory: Are egalitarian women at greater risk? Sex Roles, 41, 681–704.
(1998). Personal and organizational predictors of workplace sexual harassment of women by men. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 7–18.
(1999). Hostilität und Benevolenz: Eine Skala zur Erfassung des ambivalenten Sexismus. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 211–228.
. Sexual harassment in the workplace in the European Union (1998). Verfügbar unter: www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/pdf/shworkpl.pdf, 24.07.2007.
(2008). Modern rape myths: The Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression scale. In , The psychology of modern prejudice (pp. 261–276). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
(1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.
(1995). Why didn’t she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women’s responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117–138.
(1997). But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioural, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In , Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5–28). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
(2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 422–440.
(1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 491–512.
(1993). Changed women and changed organizations: Consequences of and coping with sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 28–48.
(1982). Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 55–74.
(1999). Signifikanztest für zwei korrelierte Korrelationen. Verfügbar on-line: userpage.fu-berlin.de/~ahahn/sigcorr.html.
(1991). Sexuelle Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz. Nr. 260 der Serie des Bundesministeriums für Jugend, Frauen und Gesundheit, Stuttgart.
(1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.
(2005). Who says it’s sexual harassment? The effects of gender and likelihood to sexually harass on legal judgments of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 745–772.
(2002, 9). Deutsche Fassung der Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Poster präsentiert beim 43. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Berlin.
(1990). Changed lives: The psychological impact of sexual harassment. In , Ivory Power: Sexual harassment on campus (pp. 73–92). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
(1982). Sexual assault and harassment: A campus community case study. SIGNS, 8, 296–319.
(2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 853–870.
(1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138–157.
(1989). Ideology or experience? Sex Roles, 20, 135–145.
(1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172 – 175.
(2002). Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit. Diagnostica, 48, 121–129.
(2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 396–402.
(2004). Explaining sexual harassment judgments: Looking beyond gender of the rater. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 69–95.
(1998). Sexual harassment: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 111–128.
(1998). Sexual Harassment: Identifying Risk Factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 561–580.
(1998). Propensity to sexually harass: An exploration of gender differences. Sex Roles, 38, 443–460.
(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68.
(1987). Sexual harassment proclivities in men. Sex Roles, 17, 269–290.
(1995). A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 69–84.
(1993). A social psychological analysis of sexual harassment: The person/situation interaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 68–83.
(1994). Sexual cognition processes in men high in the likelihood to sexually harass. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 163–169.
(2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 914–922.
(1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493–517.
(2007). Ein Vorname sagt mehr als 1000 Worte. Zur sozialen Wahrnehmung von Vornamen. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38, 17–31.
(2003). Eine deutschsprachige Skala zur Erfassung der Neigung zu sexueller Belästigung. Posterpräsentation, 9. Tagung der Fachgruppe Sozialpsychologie, Heidelberg, 21.–24. September 2003.
(1995). Meta-analysis programs (Version 5.3). Available on-line: web.fuberlin.de/gesund/gesu_engl/meta_e.htm.
(2008). A refined computer harassment paradigm: Validation, and test of hypotheses about target characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 22–35.
(1975). A short scale of attitudes toward feminism. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 6, 51–56.
(1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität. Diagnostica, 4, 173–177.
(1995). Acknowledging sexual harassment : A test of alternative models. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 469–496.
(1996). Sexual harassment. In , Sex, power, conflict. Evolutionary and feminist perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
(1991). The evolutionary psychology of sexual harassment in organizations. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 249–290.
(1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.
(1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 33–54.
(1988). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: An update. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
(1995). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Trends, progress, continuing challenges. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
(2006). Beurteilung sexuell belästigenden Verhaltens: Die Rolle von Kontextfaktoren. Posterpräsentation, 48. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Mainz, 26.–29. März 2006.
(2008a). All is fair in love and war – for women and attractive men only? Gender bias in communications with sexual connotation. Vortrag, 50. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Marburg, 3.–5. März 2008.
(2008b). Bad but a beau? Effects of harasser attractiveness on judgments of unwanted sexual attention. Poster presented at the XXIX International Congress of Psychology, Berlin, July 20–25, 2008.
(1997). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 71–93.
