Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.55.3.153

Zusammenfassung. Ergebnisse früherer Untersuchungen geben Anlass zu Zweifeln an der diagnostischen Validität vieler in der Schizotypieforschung eingesetzten psychometrischen Standardverfahren. Das kürzlich vorgelegte Eppendorfer Schizophrenie-Inventar (ESI) erfasst eine Reihe von psychopathologischen Symptomen, die sich in direkten Vergleichen mit anderen klinischen Gruppen wiederholt als besonders charakteristisch für Schizophrenie erwiesen haben. In der vorliegenden Evaluationsstudie sollte die Eignung des ESI für Schizotypiestudien geprüft werden. Dazu wurden N = 57 gesunde Erwachsene mit dem ESI sowie zu Vergleichszwecken mit der Perceptual Aberration Scale, dem Continuous Performance Test und der Span of Apprehension Task untersucht. Es fanden sich hypothesengemäß signifikante Korrelationen zwischen dem ESI und allen eingesetzten Vergleichsverfahren. Diese Befunde stützen die Annahme, dass das ESI schizotypische Persönlichkeitsaspekte bei klinisch unauffälligen Probanden erfasst. Seine Verwendung in High-Risk- und Schizotypiestudien erscheint vielversprechend.


The Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory (ESI) as methodological approach in high-risk and schizotypy research

Abstract. Results of former studies raise doubts abut the diagnostic validity of many psychometric standard instruments of schizotypy research. In several clinical comparison studies, the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory (ESI) has been proved to measure psychopathological symptoms that are characteristic for schizophrenia. The suitability of the ESI for schizotypy research is unknown and was examined with a study on N = 57 healthy adults. For purposes of comparison, the Perceptual Aberration Scale, a Continuous Performance Test, and a Span of Apprehension Task were administered. As hypothesized, the ESI correlated significantly with all of the compared procedures. These results support the assumption that the ESI obtains aspects of schizotypal personality in non-clinical subjects. The application of the ESI in schizotypy and high-risk studies seems promising.

Literatur

  • Andresen, B. , Maß, R. (Hrsg.) (2001). Schizotypie. Psychometrische Entwicklungen und biopsychologische Forschungsansätze. Göttingen: Hogrefe. Google Scholar

  • Asarnow, R. F. , Granholm, E. , Sherman, T. (1991). Span of apprehension in schizophrenia. In S. R. Steinhauer, J. H. Gruzelier, J. Zubin (Eds.), Handbook of Schizophrenia: Neuropsychology, Psychophysiology and Information Processing (pp. 335–370). Amsterdam, London, New York, Tokio: Elsevier. Google Scholar

  • Asarnow, R. F. , Nuechterlein, K. H. , Marder, S. R. (1983). Span of apprehension performance, neuropsychological functioning, and indices of psychosis-proneness. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 171, 662–669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T. , Tassinary, L. G. , Berntson, G. G. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of Psychophysiology. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Chapman, L. J. , Chapman, J. P. , Raulin, M. L. (1978). Body-image aberration in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 399–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, W. J. , Faraone, S. V. (2000). Sustained attention deficits as markers of genetic susceptibility to schizophrenia. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 97, 52–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Claridge, G. (1987). ’The schizophrenias as nervous types’ revisited. British Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 735–743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cromwell, R. L. (1987). An argument concerning schizophrenia: The left hemisphere drains the swamp. In A. Glass (Eds.), Individual differences in hemispheric specialization (pp. 349–356). London: Spectrum Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cutting, J. (1994). Evidence for right hemisphere dysfunction in schizophrenia. In A. S. David, J. C. Cutting (Eds.), The Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia (pp. 231–242). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd. Google Scholar

  • Dawson, M. E. , Schell, A. M. , Böhmelt, A. H. (Eds.) (1999). Startle Modification: Implications for Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, and Clinical Science. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Estes, W. K. , Taylor, H. A. (1964). A detection method and probabilistic models for assessing information processing from brief visual displays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 52, 446–454. Google Scholar

  • Frith, C. D. (2004). Schizophrenia and theory of mind. Psychological Medicine, 34, 385–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Green, D. M. , Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar

  • Gross, G. , Huber, G. , Klosterkötter, J. , Linz, M. (1987). BSABS. Bonner Skala für die Beurteilung von Basissymptomen. Bonn Scale for the Assessment of Basic Symptoms. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar

  • Handest, P. , Parnas, J. (2005). Clinical characteristics of first-admitted patients with ICD-10 schizotypal disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 48 (Supplement), s49–s54. Google Scholar

  • Kathmann, N. , Wagner, M. , Satzger, W. , Engel, R. R. (1996). Vigilanzmessung auf Verhaltensebene: Der Continuous Performance Test – München (CPT-M). In H.-J. Möller, R. R. Engel, P. Hoff (Hrsg.), Befunderhebung in der Psychiatrie: Lebensqualität, Negativsymptomatik und andere aktuelle Entwicklungen (S. 331–338). Wien, New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lenzenweger, M. F. (1994). Psychometric high-risk paradigm, perceptual aberrations, and schizotypy: An update. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 20, 121–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ludewig, K. , Geyer, M. A. , Vollenweider, F. X. (2003) Deficits in prepulse inhibition and habituation in never-medicated, first-episode schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 121–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maß, R. (2000). Characteristic subjective experiences of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26, 921–931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maß, R. (2001). Eppendorfer Schizophrenie-Inventar (ESI). Göttingen: Hogrefe. Google Scholar

  • Maß, R. (2002). Das Vigilanzparadigma in der Schizophrenieforschung. Untersuchungen zum Continuous Performance Test (CPT). Fortschritte der Neurologie • Psychiatrie, 70, 34–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maß, R. , Girndt, K. , Matouschek, A.-K. , Peter, P. M. , Plitzko, N. , Andresen, B. , Haasen, C. , Dahme, B. (2007). Introducing the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory (ESI) as a psychometric method for schizotypy research. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 525–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maß, R. , Haasen, C. , Borgart, E.-J. (2005). Abnormal subjective experiences of schizophrenia. Evaluation of the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory (ESI). Psychiatry Research, 135, 91–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maß, R. , Schömig, T. , Novikov, J. , Wagner, M. (2001). Effects of cerebral hemispheric laterality on the span of apprehension of schizophrenic and healthy subjects. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 251, 18–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meehl, P. E. (1990). Toward an integrated theory of schizotaxia, schizotypy, and schizophrenia. Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 1–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nuechterlein, K. H. , Dawson, M. E. (1984a). A heuristic vulnerability/stress model of schizophrenic episodes. Schizophrenia Bulletin,10, 300–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nuechterlein, K. H. , Dawson, M. E. (1984b). Information processing and attentional functioning in the developmental course of schizophrenic disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 10, 160–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nuechterlein, K. H. , Dawson, M. E. , Green, M. F. (1994). Information-processing abnormalities as neuropsychological vulnerability indicators for schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 90, 71–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nuechterlein, K. H. , Dawson, M. E. , Ventura, J. , Fogelson, D. , Gitlin, M. , Mintz, J. (1991). Testing vulnerability models: Stability of potential vulnerability indicators across clinical states. In H. Häfner, W. F. Gattaz (Eds.), Search for the Causes of Schizophrenia (pp. 177–191). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar

  • Raine, A. (1991). The SPQ: A scale for the assessment of schizotypal personality based on DSM-III-R criteria. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 17, 555–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raine, A. , Reynolds, C. , Lencz, T. , Scerbo, A. , Triphon, N. , Kim, D. (1994). Cognitive-perceptual, interpersonal, and disorganized features of schizotypal personality. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 20, 191–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rossi, A. , Daneluzzo, E. (2002). Schizotypal dimensions in normals and schizophrenic patients: A comparison with other clinical samples. Schizophrenia Research, 54, 67–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosvold, H. E. , Mirsky, A. , Sarason, I. , Bransome Jr., E. D. , Beck, L. H. (1956). A continuous performance test of brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 20, 343–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scherbarth-Roschmann, P. , Hautzinger, M. (1991). Zur psychometrischen Erfassung von Schizotypie. Methodische Überprüfung und erste Validierung von zwei Skalen zur Erfassung von Risikomerkmalen. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 20, 238–250. Google Scholar

  • Süllwold, L. , Huber, G. (Hrsg.). (1986). Schizophrene Basisstörungen. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vauth, R. , Rüsch, N. , Wirtz, M. , Corrigan, P. W. (2004). Does social cognition influence the relation between neurocognitive deficits and vocational functioning in schizophrenia? Psychiatry Research, 128, 155–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vollema, M. G. , van den Bosch, R. J. (1995). The multidimensionality of schizotypy. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 21, 19–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar