Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Long-Term Effects of the Family Check-Up in Pub...

volgende artikel Evaluation of Yoga for Preventing Adolescent Su...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

22-04-2016 | Empirical Research | Uitgave 3/2017

Does Mindset Intervention Predict Students’ Daily Experience in Classrooms? A Comparison of Seventh and Ninth Graders’ Trajectories

Tijdschrift:: Journal of Youth and Adolescence > Uitgave 3/2017

Auteurs:: Jennifer A. Schmidt, Lee Shumow, Hayal Z. Kackar-Cam

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Abstract

One’s beliefs about whether ability is fixed or malleable—also known as fixed or growth mindset—can impact academic outcomes. This quasi-experimental study investigated effects of a six-week classroom intervention targeting growth mindset on students’ daily quality of experience in science classrooms. Seventh grade (N = 370) and 9th grade (N = 356) students (50 % female, 61 % Hispanic) were randomly assigned by classroom to either a mindset intervention condition or content writing task condition. Students provided self-reports on multiple aspects of their daily classroom experience 11 times across the school year. Hierarchical linear growth models indicate that 7th and 9th grade students who were not exposed to the mindset intervention showed declines in perceived control skill, interest, and learning. In contrast, 9th graders in the mindset intervention reported increased control and interest, and maintained constant levels in skill and learning. Similar effects were not observed among 7th graders. The results are discussed in terms of implications for future research and optimal developmental periods for mindset intervention.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125. CrossRef

Barmby, P., Kind, P. M., & Jones, K. (2008). Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1075–1093. CrossRef

Bellg, A. J., Borrelli, B., Resnick, B., Hecht, J., Minicucci, D. S., Ory, M., et al. (2004). Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychology, 23(5), 443–451. CrossRefPubMed

Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Kwok, O. M. (2003). Personality over time: Methodological approaches to the study of short-term and long-term development and change. Journal of Personality, 71(6), 905–942. CrossRefPubMed

Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. CrossRefPubMed

Brainology. (2010). Introduction. Retrieved from http://www.brainology.us/websitemedia/brainology_introduction.pdf.

Chiu, C. Y., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 19–30. CrossRefPubMed

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 525–536. CrossRef

Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1980). An analysis of learned helplessness: The processing of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 940–952. CrossRefPubMed

Donohoe, C., Topping, K., & Hannah, E. (2012). The impact of an online intervention ( Brainology) on the mindset and resiliency of secondary school pupils: A preliminary mixed methods study. Educational Psychology, 32(5), 641–655. CrossRef

Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

Dweck, C. S. (2006a). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.

Dweck, C. S. (2006b). Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 47–55). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Dweck, C. S. (2007). The perils and promises of praise. Educational Leadership, 65(2), 34–39.

Dweck, C. S. (2008a). Brainology: Transforming students’ motivation to learn. Independent School, 67(2). Retrieved from http://www.nais.org/publications/ismagazinearticle.cfm?Itemnumber=150509&sn.ItemNumber=145956.

Dweck, C. S. (2008b). Mindsets and math/science achievement. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York, Institute for Advanced Study, Commission on Mathematics and Science Education.

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. CrossRef

Dweck, C. S., & Molden, D. C. (2005). Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In C. S. Dweck & A. J. Elliott (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 122–140). New York: Guilford Press.

Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In C. Ames (Ed.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 3. Goals and cognitions (pp. 139–186). New York: Academic Press.

Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & MacIver, D. (1993). Developing during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. CrossRefPubMed

Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5–12. CrossRefPubMed

Feingold, A. (2009). Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. Psychological Methods, 14, 43–53. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. CrossRef

Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 519–533. CrossRefPubMed

George, R. (2000). Measuring change in students’ attitudes toward science over time: An application of latent variable growth modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(3), 213–225. CrossRef

Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 645–662. CrossRef

Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3–13. CrossRef

Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553. CrossRefPubMed

Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossRef

Henderson, V., & Dweck, C. S. (1990). Adolescence and achievement. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: Self and identity development (pp. 308–329). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Herlihy, C. (2007). Toward ensuring a smooth transition into high school [Issue brief]. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, National High School Center. Retrieved from www.betterhighschools.org/docs/NHSC_TowardEnsuring_051607.pdf.

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. CrossRef

Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, E. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington DC: American Association of University Women.

Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895. CrossRef

Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science class. Science, 326, 1410–1412. CrossRefPubMed

Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509–527. CrossRefPubMed

Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-work and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 835–847. CrossRefPubMed

Larson, R. W., Moneta, G., Richards, M. H., & Wilson, S. (2002). Continuity, stability, and change in daily emotional experience across adolescence. Child Development, 73(4), 1151–1165. CrossRefPubMed

Mangels, J., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(2), 75–86. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 417–430. CrossRef

Marsh, H. W., & O’Mara, A. (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 542–552. CrossRefPubMed

McCambridge, J., Witton, J., & Elbourne, D. R. (2014). Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(3), 267–277. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013). Instrument development in the affective domain: School and corporate applications (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. CrossRef

McCoach, D. B., O’Connell, A. A., Reis, S. M., & Levitt, H. A. (2006). Growing readers: A hierarchical linear model of children’s reading growth during the first 2 years of school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 14–28. CrossRef

MindsetWorks. (2012). Evidence of impact: Brainology and MindsetWorks SchoolKit. Retrieved from https://www.mindsetworks.com/websitemedia/info/impactsummaryhandout.pdf.

Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Intelligence praise can undermine motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52. CrossRefPubMed

Niepel, C., Brunner, M., & Preckel, F. (2014). The longitudinal interplay of students’ academic self-concepts and achievements within and across domains: Replicating and extending the reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1170–1191. CrossRef

Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of Achievement Motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X. (2001). Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. Psychological Methods, 6, 387–401. CrossRefPubMed

Robins, R. W., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1(4), 313–336. CrossRef

Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411–427. CrossRef

Schmidt, J. A., & Shumow, L. (2013). Exploring teacher effects in outcomes of a growth mindset intervention in seventh grade science classes. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA, May.

Schmidt, J. A., Shumow, L., & Kackar-Cam, H. Z. (2015a). Exploring impacts of a growth mindset intervention on the daily classroom experiences of students in 7th and 9th grade science. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. April.

Schmidt, J. A., Shumow, L., & Kackar-Cam, H. Z. (2015b). Teacher effects in outcomes of a growth mindset intervention in seventh grade science classes. Middle Grades Research Journal, 10(2), 17–32.

Schweinle, A., Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Striking the right balance: Students’ motivation and affect in elementary mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(5), 271–294. CrossRef

Seaton, M., Parker, P., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Yeung, A. S. (2014). The reciprocal relations between self-concept, motivation and achievement: juxtaposing academic self-concept and achievement goal orientations for mathematics success. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 34(1), 49–72. CrossRef

Shumow, L., & Schmidt, J. A. (2014). Enhancing adolescents’ motivation for science: Research-based strategies for teaching male and female students. In D. Meyer & L. H. Anderman (Eds.), APA’s classroom insights from educational psychology series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Sorich, L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Mastery-oriented thinking. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The psychology of what works (pp. 232–251). New York: Oxford University Press.

Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(2), 69–74. CrossRefPubMed

Stipek, D., & Gralinski, J. H. (1996). Children’s beliefs about intelligence and school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 397–407. CrossRef

Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998). Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 730–745. CrossRef

Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573. CrossRefPubMed

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. CrossRefPubMed

Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 1–13. CrossRef

Zimmer-Gembec, M. J., & Collins, W. A. (2003). Autonomy development during adolescence. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 175–204). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Zuzanek, J. (1999). Experience sampling method: Current and potential research applications. Paper presented at the workshop on time-use measurement and research, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

Titel: Does Mindset Intervention Predict Students’ Daily Experience in Classrooms? A Comparison of Seventh and Ninth Graders’ Trajectories
Auteurs:: Jennifer A. Schmidt
Lee Shumow
Hayal Z. Kackar-Cam
Publicatiedatum: 22-04-2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0489-z
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Tijdschrift: Journal of Youth and Adolescence A Multidisciplinary Research Publication
Uitgave 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2017

Discrepancies in Autonomy and Relatedness Promoting Behaviors of Substance Using Mothers and Their Children: The Effects of a Family Systems Intervention

Fleur Gabriel: Deconstructing Youth: Youth Discourses at the Limits of Sense

London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Results from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion and Antisocial Behavior

Comparing Two Low Middle School Social and Emotional Learning Program Formats: A Multilevel Effectiveness Study

Evaluation of Yoga for Preventing Adolescent Substance Use Risk Factors in a Middle School Setting: A Preliminary Group-Randomized Controlled Trial

Engagement and Mentor Support as Drivers of Social Development in the Project K Youth Development Program